Abstract
The Integrated self-categorization model of autism (ISCA) argues that a self-categorization dysfunction could be the link between some of the disparate features of ASD. To the extent that this is true, any social psychological phenomena arising from self-categorization should be impaired in autistic people. Based on this premise, we investigated whether ingroup favouritism within the minimal group paradigm is reduced to the extent that individuals possess autistic traits. Results indicated that participants with a high proportion of autistic traits showed less ingroup favouritism, and that this was due to a decreased tendency for self-categorization. By providing evidence of the disruption of self-categorization in ASD, these findings lend support to ISCA and raise important issues for existing accounts of the disorder.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10803-019-04149-z/MediaObjects/10803_2019_4149_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10803-019-04149-z/MediaObjects/10803_2019_4149_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10803-019-04149-z/MediaObjects/10803_2019_4149_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10803-019-04149-z/MediaObjects/10803_2019_4149_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10803-019-04149-z/MediaObjects/10803_2019_4149_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10803-019-04149-z/MediaObjects/10803_2019_4149_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
MIP occurs when a participant allocates the highest number of points to the ingroup member. MD occurs when the participant allocates points in such a way as to maximise the difference in points in favour of the ingroup. MJP occurs when a participant allocates the highest total number of points across both recipients. F occurs when ingroup and outgroup recipients are allocated an equal number of points. Where MIP and MD are pitted against each other, MIP is indicative of absolute ingroup favouritism and MD of relative ingroup favouritism.
References
Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1975). Categorization, belief similarity, and intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.971.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5TM (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.
Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340.
Ashwin, C., Hietanen, J. K., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Atypical integration of social cues for orienting to gaze direction in adults with autism. Molecular Autism, 6(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-6-5.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: a revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system. In B. J. Ellis & D. F. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 468–492). New York: Guilford Publications Inc.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “Theory of Mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471.
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420030103.
Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (7th ed., pp. 209–232). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.
Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543.
Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080312.
Brunsdon, V. E. A., & Happé, F. (2014). Exploring the “fractionation” of autism at the cognitve level. Autism, 18, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313499456.
Cooper, D. K., Smith, L., & Russell, A. (2017). Social identity, self-esteem, and mental health in autism. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2297.
Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. A., Haslam, C., & Jetten, J. (2014). Depression and social identity: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 215–238.
Doise, W., Csepeli, G., Dann, H. D., Gouge, C., Larsen, K., & Ostell, A. (1972). An experimental investigation into the formation of intergroup representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420020208.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “Theory of Mind”. Cognition, 50, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90024-8.
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.708.
Georgiades, S., Szatmari, P., Boyle, M., Hanna, S., Duku, E., Zwaigenbaum, L., et al. (2013). Investigating phenotypic heterogeneity in children with austism spectrum disorder: A factor mixture modeling approach. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02588.x.
Ghaziuddin, M., Ghaziuddin, N., & Greden, J. (2002). Depression in persons with autism: Implications for research and clinical care. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016330802348.
Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(76)80006-6.
Happé, F. (1994). Wechsler IQ profile and Theory of Mind in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01287.x.
Happé, F. (1997). Central coherence and Theory of Mind in autism: Reading homographs in context. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1997.tb00721.x.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0.
Happé, F., & Ronald, A. (2008). The “fractionable autism triad”: A review of evidence from behavioural, genetic, cognitive and neural research. Neuropsychology Review, 18, 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-008-9076-8.
Happé, F., Ronald, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature, 9, 1218–1220. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1770.
Haslam, S. A. (1997). Stereotyping and social influence: Foundations of stereotype consensus. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 119–143). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G., & Chang, M. X. (2016). Groups4Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health. Journal of Affective Disorders, 194, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010.
Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., Dingle, G., & Haslam, S. A. (2018). The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Abingdon: Routledge.
Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & Haslam, C. (2009). Social identity, health and well-being: An emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology, 58, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025007004.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01054.x.
Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping II: The relationship between frame of reference, self-categorization and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220305.
Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, G., & Hayes, B. K. (1992). Context dependent variation in social stereotyping I: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220104.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hobson, R. P., Ouston, J., & Lee, A. (1988). What’s in a face? The case of autism. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02745.x.
Hoekstra, R. A., Vinkhuyzen, A. A. E., Wheelwright, S., Bartels, M., Boomsma, D. I., Baron-Cohen, S., … van der Sluis, S. (2011). The construction and validation of an abridged version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ-Short). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1073-0.
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x.
Jarrold, C., Butler, D. W., Cottington, E. M., & Jimenez, F. (2000). Linking Theory of Mind and central coherence bias in autism and in the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1037//O012-1649.36.1.126.
Jetten, J., Haslam, C., & Haslam, S. A. (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. New York: Psychology Press.
Johnson, S. A., Filliter, J. H., & Murphy, R. R. (2009). Discrepancies between self- and parent-perceptions of autistic traits and empathy in high-functioning children and adolescents on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 39, 1706–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0809-1.
Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger Syndrome faster than normal on the embedded figures test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01539.x.
Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). A test of central coherence theory: Can adults with high-functioning autism or Asperger Syndrome integrate objects in context? Visual Cognition, 8, 67–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280042000036.
Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., … Pascalis, O. (2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8(6), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.0434a.x.
Kim, J. A., Szatmari, P., Bryson, S. E., Streiner, D. L., & Wilson, F. J. (2000). The prevalence of anxiety and mood problems among children with autism and Asperger Syndrome. Autism, 4, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361300004002002.
Langdell, T. (1978). Recognition of faces: An approach to the study of autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 19, 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1978.tb00468.x.
Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144.
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.
McGarty, C. (1999). Categorization in social psychology. London: Sage.
McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1994). The effects of salient group memberships on persuasion. Small Group Research, 25, 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496494252007.
Montalan, B., Lelard, T., Godefroy, O., & Mouras, H. (2012). Behavioral investigation of the influence of social categorization on empathy for pain: A minimal group paradigm study. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00389.
Morgan, B., Maybery, M., & Durkin, K. (2003). Weak Central Coherence, poor joint attention, and low verbal ability: Independent deficits in early autism. Developmental Psychology, 39, 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.646.
Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: An update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 27–43.
Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220202.
Murray, A. L., Booth, T., Mckenzie, K., Kuenssberg, R., & O’Donnell, M. (2014). Are autistic traits measured equivalently in individuals with and without an autism spectrum disorder? An invariance analysis of the Autism Spectrum Quotient Short Form. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1851-6.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420100307.
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00930.x.
Petersen, L. E., & Blank, H. (2003). Ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm shown by three-person groups with high or low state self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.137.
Platow, M. J., Grace, D. M., & Smithson, M. J. (2012). Examining the preconditions for psychological group membership. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611407081.
Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2012). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12006.
Quattrone, G. A., & Jones, E. E. (1980). The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.141.
Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2016). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for female. Perception, 31, 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3331.
Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press.
Russell-Smith, S. N., Maybery, M. T., Bayliss, D. M., & Sng, A. A. H. (2012). Support for a link between the local processing bias and social deficits in autism: An investigation of Embedded Figures Test performance in non-clinical individuals. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2420–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1506-z.
Schuwerk, T., Vuori, M., & Sodian, B. (2015). Implicit and explicit Theory of Mind reasoning in autism spectrum disorders: The impact of experience. Autism, 19(4), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314526004.
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1983). An inslet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1983.tb00137.x.
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1993). Why do autistic individuals show superior performance on the Block Design Task? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb02095.x.
Sherif, M. (1956). Experiments in group conflict. Scientific American, 5, 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1156-54.
Shteynberg, G. (2010). A silent emergence of culture: The social tuning effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 683–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019573.
Skorich, D. P., Gash, T. B., Stalker, K. L., Zheng, L., & Haslam, S. A. (2017). Exploring the cognitive foundations of the shared attention mechanism: Evidence for a relationship between self-categorization and shared attention across the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 1341–1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3049-9.
Skorich, D. P., & Mavor, K. I. (2013). Cognitive load privileges memory-based over data-driven processing, not group-level over person-level processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 469–488.
Skorich, D. P., May, A. R., Talipski, L. A., Hall, M. H., Dolstra, A. J., Gash, T. B., et al. (2016). Is social categorization the missing link between weak central coherence and mental state inference abilities in autism? Preliminary evidence from a general population sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 862–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2623-2.
Spears, R., & Otten, S. (2017). Discrimination: Revisiting Tajfel’s minimal group studies. In S. A. Haslam & J. R. Smith (Eds.), Social psychology: Revisiting the classic studies (pp. 164–181). London: Sage.
Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: The sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, and morals. New York, NY: Ginn & Co.
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010202.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. C. (1983). Some comments on… “the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm”. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420130403.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77–122.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002.
van Steensel, F. J. A., Bögels, S. M., & Perrin, S. (2011). Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents with Autistic Spectrum Disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-011-0097-0.
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of Theory-of-Mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304.
White, S. W., Oswald, D., Ollendick, T., & Scahill, L. (2009). Anxiety in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.003.
Woodbury-Smith, M. R., Robinson, J., Wheelwright, S., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). Screening adults for Asperger Syndrome using the AQ: A preliminary study of its dagnostic validity in clinical practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 331–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-3300-7.
Yafai, A. F., Verrier, D., & Reidy, L. (2014). Social conformity and autism spectrum disorder: A child-friendly take on a classic study. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 18, 1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313508023.
Funding
This research was supported by the Australian Research Council (Grant No. FLFL110100199) and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (Social Interactions Identity and Well-Being Program).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DPS and SAH conceived of the idea of the study reported in the paper, with significant input from KB in the study design phase of the project. KB analysed the data with help from DPS. KB wrote the first draft of the paper with significant input from SAH. DPS was responsible for the final draft of the paper, with input from KB and SAH.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study reported in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bertschy, K., Skorich, D.P. & Haslam, S.A. Self-categorization and Autism: Exploring the Relationship Between Autistic Traits and Ingroup Favouritism in the Minimal Group Paradigm. J Autism Dev Disord 50, 3296–3311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04149-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04149-z