Reduced Order Modeling

• Abadía-Heredia R et al (2022) A predictive hybrid reduced order model based on proper orthogonal decom position combined with deep learning architectures. Expert Syst Appl 187:115910

  Google Scholar 

• Ahmed HF et al (2021) Machine learning-based reduced-order modeling of hydrodynamic forces using pressure mode decomposition. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part G: J Aerosp Eng 235(16):2517–2528

  Google Scholar 

• Ahmed SE et al (2020) A long short-term memory embedding for hybrid uplifted reduced order models. Phys D: Nonlinear Phenom 409:132471

  Google Scholar 

• Ahmed SE et al (2021) On closures for reduced order models-a spectrum of first-principle to machine-learned avenues. Phys Fluids 33(9):091301

  Google Scholar 

• Akhtar I, Borggaard J, Hay A (2010) Shape sensitivity analysis in flow models using a finite-difference approach. Math Probl Eng

  Google Scholar 

• Alla A, Kutz JN (2017) Nonlinear model order reduction via dynamic mode decomposition. SIAM J Sci Comput 39(5):B778–B796

  Google Scholar 

• Amsallem D, Farhat C (2011) An online method for interpolating linear parametric reduced-order models. SIAM J Sci Comput 33(5):2169–2198

  Google Scholar 

• Amsallem D, Farhat C (2012) Stabilization of projection-based reduced-order models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 91(4):358–377

  Google Scholar 

• An SS, Kim T, James DL (2008) Optimizing cubature for efficient integration of subspace deformations. ACM Trans Graph 27(5):65:1–165:10

  Google Scholar 

• Antil H, Heinkenschloss M, Sorensen DC (2014) Application of the discrete empirical interpolation method to reduced order modeling of nonlinear and parametric systems. In: Quarteroni A, Rozza G (eds) Reduced order methods for modeling and computational reduction. MS &A—Modeling, Simulation and Applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 101–136

  Google Scholar 

• Arian E, Fahl M, Sachs EW (2000) Trust-Region Proper Orthogonal Decomposition for Flow Control. Technical report. Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, Hampton VA

  Google Scholar 

• Astrid P et al (2008) Missing point estimation in models described by proper orthogonal decomposition. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(10):2237–2251

  Google Scholar 

• Azaïez M, Chacon Rebollo T, Rubino S (2021) A cure for instabilities due to advection-dominance in POD solution to advection-diffusion-reaction equations. J Comput Phys 425:109916

  Google Scholar 

• Baiges J et al (2020) A finite element reduced-order model based on adaptive mesh refinement and artificial neural networks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 121(4):588–601

  Google Scholar 

• Baiges J et al (2021) An adaptive finite element strategy for the numerical simulation of additive manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf 37:101650

  Google Scholar 

• Baiges J, Codina R, Idelsohn S (2015) Reduced-order subscales for POD models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 291:173–196

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Baiges J, Codina R (2013a) A variational multiscale method with subscales on the element boundaries for the helmholtz equation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 93(6):664–684

  Google Scholar 

• Baiges J, Codina R, Idelsohn S (2013b) A domain decomposition strategy for reduced order models. Application to the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 267:23–42

  Google Scholar 

• Baiges J, Codina R, Idelsohn S (2013c) Explicit reduced-order models for the stabilized finite element approximation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 72(12):1219–1243

  Google Scholar 

• Baldi P, Hornik K (1989) Neural networks and principal component analysis: learning from examples without local minima. Neural Netw 2(1):53–58

  Google Scholar 

• Ballard DH (1987) Modular learning in neural networks. In: Proceedings of the sixth national conference on artificial intelligence, vol 1. AAAI’87. AAAI Press, Seattle, Washington, pp 279–284

  Google Scholar 

• Ballarin F et al (2015) Supremizer stabilization of POD-galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incom pressible Navier–Stokes equations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(5):1136–1161

  Google Scholar 

• Barrault M et al (2004) An empirical interpolation method: application to efficient reduced-basis discretization of partial differential equations. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 339(9):667–672

  Google Scholar 

• Benosman M, Chakrabarty A, Borggaard J (2020) Reinforcement learning-based model reduction for partial differential equations. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 21st IFAC World Congress 53(2):7704–7709

  Google Scholar 

• Bergmann M, Cordier L, Brancher J-P (2007) Drag minimization of the cylinder wake by trust-region proper orthogonal decomposition. In: Active flow control. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–324

  Google Scholar 

• Bertsimas D, Dunn J (2017) Optimal classification trees. Mach Learn 106(7):1039–1082

  Google Scholar 

• Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/petrov-galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32(1):199–259

  Google Scholar 

• Brunton SL et al (2017) Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system. Nat Commun 8(1):19

  Google Scholar 

• Brunton SL, Proctor JL, Kutz JN (2016) Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(15):3932–3937

  Google Scholar 

• Bui-Thanh T, Willcox K, Ghattas O (2008) Model reduction for large-scale systems with high-dimensional parametric input space. SIAM J Sci Comput 30(6):3270–3288

  Google Scholar 

• Buoso S et al (2022)Stabilized reduced-order models for unsteady incompressible flows in three-dimensional parametrized domains. Comput Fluids 246:105604

  Google Scholar 

• Burkardt J, Gunzburger M, Lee H-C (2006) POD and CVT-based reduced-order modeling of Navier–Stokes flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(1–3):337–355

  Google Scholar 

• Callaham JL et al (2022) An empirical mean-field model of symmetry-breaking in a turbulent wake. Sci Adv 8(19):eabm4786

  Google Scholar 

• Carlberg K, Barone M, Antil H (2017) Galerkin v. Least-Squares Petrov-Galerkin projection in nonlinear model reduction. J Comput Phys 330:693–734

  Google Scholar 

• Carlberg K, Bou-Mosleh C, Farhat C (2011) Efficient non-linear model reduction via a least-squares petrov-galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86(2):155–181

  Google Scholar 

• Champion K et al (2019) Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(45):22445–22451

  Google Scholar 

• Chatterjee A (2000) An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Curr Sci 78(7):808–817

  Google Scholar 

• Chaturantabut S, Sorensen DC (2010) Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM J Sci Comput 32(5):2737–2764

  Google Scholar 

• Chen KK, Tu JH, Rowley CW (2012) Variants of dynamic mode decomposition: boundary condition, koopman, and fourier analyses. J Nonlinear Sci 22(6):887–915

  Google Scholar 

• Chen W et al (2021) Physics-informed machine learning for reduced-order modeling of nonlinear problems. J Comput Phys 446:110666

  Google Scholar 

• Chen Z, Zhao Y, Huang R (2019) Parametric reduced-order modeling of unsteady aerodynamics for hyper sonic vehicles. Aerosp Sci Technol 87:1–14

  Google Scholar 

• Chinesta F, Ammar, A Cueto E (2010) Recent advances and new challenges in the use of the proper generalized decomposition for solving multidimensional models. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(4):327–350

  Google Scholar 

• Chinesta F, Ladeveze P, Cueto E (2011) A short review on model order reduction based on proper generalized decomposition. Arch Comput Methods Eng 18(4):395

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R (2000a) On stabilized finite element methods for linear systems of convection-diffusion-reaction equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 188(1):61–82

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R (2000b) Stabilization of incompressibility and convection through orthogonal sub-scales in finite element methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(13–14):1579–1599

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R (2002) Stabilized finite element approximation of transient incompressible flows using orthogonal subscales. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(39–40):4295–4321

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R et al (2007) Time dependent subscales in the stabilized finite element approximation of incompressible flow problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(21–24):2413–2430

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R et al (2018) Variational multiscale methods in computational fluid dynamics. Encycl Comput Mech 1–28

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R, Baiges J (2011) Finite element approximation of transmission conditions in fluids and solids introducing boundary subgrid scales. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87(1–5):386–411

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R, Principe J, Baiges J (2009) Subscales on the element boundaries in the variational two-scale finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(5–8):838–852

  Google Scholar 

• Codina R, Reyes R, Baiges J (2021) A posteriori error estimates in a finite element vms-based reduced order model for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Mech Res Commun. Special Issue Honoring G.I. Taylor Medalist Prof. Arif Masud 112:103599

  Google Scholar 

• Dal Santo N et al (2019) An algebraic least squares reduced basis method for the solution of nonaffinely parametrized stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:186–208

  Google Scholar 

• Daniel T et al (2020) Model order reduction assisted by deep neural networks (ROM-net). Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 7(1):16

  Google Scholar 

• Dar Z, Baiges J, Codina R (2023) Artificial neural network based correction models for reduced order models in computational fluid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 415:116232

  Google Scholar 

• Deng N et al (2020) Low-order model for successive bifurcations of the fluidic pinball. J Fluid Mech 884:A37

  Google Scholar 

• Dupuis R, Jouhaud J-C, Sagaut P (2018) Surrogate modeling of aerodynamic simulations for multiple operating conditions using machine learning. AIAA J 56(9):3622–3635

  Google Scholar 

• Eckart C, Young G (1936) The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika 1(3):211–218

  Google Scholar 

• Eivazi H et al (2022) Towards extraction of orthogonal and parsimonious non-linear modes from turbulent flows. Expert Syst Appl 202:117038

  Google Scholar 

• Everson R, Sirovich L (1664) Karhunen-Loeve procedure for Gappy data. JOSA A 12(8):1657–1664

  Google Scholar 

• Fabra A, Baiges J, Codina R (2022) Finite element approximation of wave problems with correcting terms based on training artificial neural networks with fine solutions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 399:115280

  Google Scholar 

• Farhat C, Chapman T, Avery P (2015) Structure-preserving, stability, and accuracy properties of the energy conserving sampling and weighting method for the hyper reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(5):1077–1110

  Google Scholar 

• Fresca S, Dede’ L, Manzoni A (2021) A comprehensive deep learning-based approach to reduced order modeling of nonlinear time-dependent parametrized PDEs. J Sci Comput 87(2):61

  Google Scholar 

• Fresca S, Manzoni A (2022) POD-DL-ROM: enhancing deep learning-based reduced order models for non linear parametrized PDEs by proper orthogonal decomposition. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 388:114181

  Google Scholar 

• Galletti B et al (2004) Low-order modelling of laminar flow regimes past a confined square cylinder. J Fluid Mech 503:161–170

  Google Scholar 

• García-Archilla B, Novo J, Rubino S (2022) Error analysis of proper orthogonal decomposition data assimilation schemes with grad-div stabilization for the Navier–Stokes equations. J Comput Appl Math 411:114246

  Google Scholar 

• Giere S et al (2015) SUPG reduced order models for convection-dominated convection-diffusion-reaction equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 289:454–474

  Google Scholar 

• Giere S, John V (2017) Towards physically admissible reduced-order solutions for convection-diffusion problems. Appl Math Lett 73:78–83

  Google Scholar 

• Glaz B, Liu L, Friedmann PP (2010) Reduced-order nonlinear unsteady aerodynamic modeling using a surrogate-based recurrence framework. AIAA J 48(10):2418–2429

  Google Scholar 

• Gonzalez FJ, Balajewicz M (2018) Deep convolutional recurrent autoencoders for learning low-dimensional feature dynamics of fluid systems. arXiv:1808.01346 [physics]

• Graham WR, Peraire J, Tang KY (1999) Optimal control of vortex shedding using low-order models. Part I-open-loop model development. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(7):945–972

  Google Scholar 

• Graves A, Schmidhuber J (2005) Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures. Neural Netw. IJCNN 2005 18(5):602–610

  Google Scholar 

• Guan Y, Brunton SL, Novosselov I (2021) Sparse nonlinear models of chaotic electroconvection. R Soc Open Sci 8(8):202367

  Google Scholar 

• Guo M, Hesthaven JS (2019) Data-driven reduced order modeling for time-dependent problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:75–99

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Guo M, Hesthaven JS (2018) Reduced order modeling for nonlinear structural analysis using gaussian process regression. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 341:807–826

  Google Scholar 

• Hesthaven JS, Rozza G, Stamm B (2016) Certified reduced basis methods for parametrized partial differential equations. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics. Springer International Publishing, Cham

  Google Scholar 

• Hesthaven JS, Ubbiali S (2018) Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear problems using neural networks. J Comput Phys 363:55–78

  Google Scholar 

• Higgins I et al (2022) Beta-VAE: learning basic visual concepts with a constrained variational framework. In: International conference on learning representations

  Google Scholar 

• Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

  Google Scholar 

• Hughes TJR et al (1998) The variational multiscale method-a paradigm for computational mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engineering Adv Stab Methods Comput Mech 166(1):3–24

  Google Scholar 

• Hunter A et al (2019) Reduced-order modeling through machine learning and graph-theoretic approaches for brittle fracture applications. Comput Mater Sci 157:87–98

  Google Scholar 

• Hurst HE (1951) Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 116(1):770–799

  Google Scholar 

• John Leask L (1967) The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Struct Inhomogeneous Turbul Flows 166–178

  Google Scholar 

• John V, Moreau B, Novo J (2022) Error analysis of a SUPG-stabilized POD-ROM method for convection diffusion-reaction equations. Comput Math Appl 122:48–60

  Google Scholar 

• Juang J-N (1994) Applied system identification. Prentice Hall

  Google Scholar 

• Kaheman K, Brunton SL, Kutz JN (2022) Automatic differentiation to simultaneously identify nonlinear dynamics and extract noise probability distributions from data. Mach Learn: Sci Technol 3(1):015031

  Google Scholar 

• Kaiser E et al (2014) Cluster-based reduced-order modelling of a mixing layer. J Fluid Mech 754:365–414

  Google Scholar 

• Kalashnikova I, Barone M (2011) Stable and efficient galerkin reduced order models for non-linear fluid flow. In: 6th AIAA theoretical fluid mechanics conference, p 3110

  Google Scholar 

• Kapteyn MG, Knezevic DJ, Willcox K (2020) Toward predictive digital twins via component-based reduced-order models and interpretable machine learning. In: AIAA scitech 2020 forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  Google Scholar 

• Kast M, Guo M, Hesthaven JS (2020) A non-intrusive multifidelity method for the reduced order modeling of nonlinear problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 364:112947

  Google Scholar 

• Kingma DP, Welling M (2013) Auto-encoding variational bayes. In: International conference on learning representations

  Google Scholar 

• Lee K, Carlberg KT (2020a) Deep conservation: a latent-dynamics model for exact satisfaction of physical conservation laws. arXiv:1909.09754 [physics]

• Lee K, Carlberg KT (2020b) Model reduction of dynamical systems on nonlinear manifolds using deep convolutional autoencoders. J Comput Phys 404:108973

  Google Scholar 

• LeGresley P, Alonso J (2000) Airfoil design optimization using reduced order models based on proper orthogonal decomposition. In: Fluids 2000 conference and exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

  Google Scholar 

• Li J, Du X, Martins JRRA (2022) Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 134:100849

  Google Scholar 

• Ljung L (1998) System identification: theory for the user, 2nd edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ

  Google Scholar 

• Loiseau J-C (2020) Data-driven modeling of the chaotic thermal convection in an annular thermosyphon. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 34:339–365

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Loiseau J-C, Brunton SL (2018) Constrained sparse Galerkin regression. J Fluid Mech 838:42–67

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Lucia DJ, Beran PS (2003) Projection methods for reduced order models of compressible flows. J Comput Phys 188(1):252–280

  Google Scholar 

• Lusch B, Kutz JN, Brunton SL (2018). Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamics. Nat Commun 9(1):4950

  Google Scholar 

• Maulik R et al (2021) Latent-space time evolution of non-intrusive reduced-order models using gaussian process emulation. Phys D: Nonlinear Phenom 416:132797

  Google Scholar 

• Ma C, Wang J (2019) Model reduction with memory and the machine learning of dynamical systems. Commun Comput Phys 25(4)

  Google Scholar 

• Milano M, Koumoutsakos P (2002) Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow. J Comput Phys 182(1):1–26

  Google Scholar 

• Mohan AT, Gaitonde DV (2018) A deep learning based approach to reduced order modeling for turbulent flow control using LSTM neural networks. arXiv:1804.09269 [physics]

• Mohan AT et al (2020) Embedding hard physical constraints in neural network coarse-graining of 3D turbulence. arXiv:2002.00021 [physics]

• Mohebujjaman M, Rebholz L, Iliescu T (2019) Physically constrained data-driven correction for reduced order modeling of fluid flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 89(3):103–122

  Google Scholar 

• Mori H (1965) Transport, collective motion, and brownian motion*). Prog Theor Phys 33(3):423–455

  Google Scholar 

• Mou C et al (2021) Data-driven variational multiscale reduced order models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 373:113470

  Google Scholar 

• Murata T, Fukami K, Fukagata K (2020) Nonlinear mode decomposition with convolutional neural networks for fluid dynamics. J Fluid Mech 882:A13

  Google Scholar 

• Noack BR et al (2003) A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J Fluid Mech 497:335–363

  Google Scholar 

• Noack BR et al (2016) Recursive dynamic mode decomposition of transient and post-transient wake flows. J Fluid Mech 809:843–872

  Google Scholar 

• Noack BR et al (eds) (2011) Reduced-order modelling for flow control, vol 528. Springer, CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences. Vienna

  Google Scholar 

• Otto SE, Rowley CW (2019) Linearly recurrent autoencoder networks for learning dynamics. SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 18(1):558–593

  Google Scholar 

• Pacciarini P, Rozza G (2014) Stabilized reduced basis method for parametrized advection-diffusion PDEs. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 274:1–18

  Google Scholar 

• Pawar S et al (2019) A deep learning enabler for nonintrusive reduced order modeling of fluid flows. Phys Fluids 31(8):085101

  Google Scholar 

• Pawar S et al (2021) Model fusion with physics-guided machine learning: projection-based reduced-order modeling. Phys Fluids 33(6):067123

  Google Scholar 

• Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE (2019) Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning frame work for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys 378:686–707

  Google Scholar 

• Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2005) Gaussian processes for machine learning

  Google Scholar 

• Reyes R et al (2018) Reduced order models for thermally coupled low mach flows. Adv Model Simul Eng Sci 5(1):1–20

  Google Scholar 

• Reyes R, Codina R (2020) Projection-based reduced order models for flow problems: a variational multiscale approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 363:112844

  Google Scholar 

• Rozza G, Huynh DBP, Manzoni A (2013) Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for stokes flows in parametrized geometries: roles of the inf-sup stability constants. Rozza

  Google Scholar 

• Rozza G, Lassila T, Manzoni A (2011) Reduced basis approximation for shape optimization in thermal flows with a parametrized polynomial geometric map. In: Spectral and high order methods for partial differential equations. Springer, Berlin, pp 307–315

  Google Scholar 

• Sahba S et al (2022) Dynamic mode decomposition for aero-optic wavefront characterization. Opt Eng 61(1):013105

  Google Scholar 

• San O, Iliescu T (2015) A stabilized proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model for large scale quasigeostrophic ocean circulation. Adv Comput Math 41(5):1289–1319

  Google Scholar 

• San O, Maulik R (2018a) Extreme learning machine for reduced order modeling of turbulent geophysical flows. Phys Rev E 97(4):42322

  Google Scholar 

• San O, Maulik R (2018b) Neural network closures for nonlinear model order reduction. Adv Comput Math 44(6):1717–1750

  Google Scholar 

• San O, Pawar S, Rasheed A (2022) Variational multiscale reinforcement learning for discovering reduced order closure models of nonlinear spatiotemporal transport systems. arXiv:2207.12854 [physics]

• Schmid PJ (2010) Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. J Fluid Mech 656:5–28

  Google Scholar 

• Schmid PJ, Violato D, Scarano F (2012) Decomposition of time-resolved tomographic PIV. Exp Fluids 52(6):1567–1579

  Google Scholar 

• Shah NV et al (2022) Finite element based model order reduction for parametrized one-way coupled steady state linear thermo-mechanical problems. Finite Elem Anal Des 212:103837

  Google Scholar 

• Srinivasan PA et al (2019) Predictions of turbulent shear flows using deep neural networks. Phys Rev Fluids 4(5):054603

  Google Scholar 

• Suykens JAK et al (2002) Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific

  Google Scholar 

• Takeishi N, Kawahara Y, Yairi T (2017) Learning koopman invariant subspaces for dynamic mode decom position. Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems. NIPS’17. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, pp 1130–1140

  Google Scholar 

• Tello A, Codina R (2021) Field-to-field coupled fluid structure interaction: a reduced order model study. Int J Numer Methods Eng 122(1):53–81

  Google Scholar 

• Tello A, Codina R, Baiges J (2020) Fluid structure interaction by means of variational multiscale reduced order models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 121(12):2601–2625

  Google Scholar 

• Tissot G et al (2014) Model reduction using dynamic mode decomposition. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. Flow Separation Control 342(6):410–416

  Google Scholar 

• Tu JH et al (2014) On dynamic mode decomposition: theory and applications. J Comput Dyn 1(2)(Mon Dec 01 01:00:00 CET 2014):391–421

  Google Scholar 

• Vlachas PR et al (2018) Data-driven forecasting of high-dimensional chaotic systems with long short-term memory networks. Proc R Soc A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 474(2213):20170844

  Google Scholar 

• Wan ZY, Sapsis TP (2017) Reduced-space gaussian process regression for data-driven probabilistic forecast of chaotic dynamical systems. Phys D: Nonlinear Phenom 345:40–55

  Google Scholar 

• Wang Z et al (2012) Proper orthogonal decomposition closure models for turbulent flows: a numerical comparison. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 237:10–26

  Google Scholar 

• Wang Q, Hesthaven JS, Ray D (2019) Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of unsteady flows using artificial neural networks with application to a combustion problem. J Comput Phys 384:289–307

  Google Scholar 

• Wang Q, Ripamonti N, Hesthaven JS (2020) Recurrent neural network closure of parametric POD-Galerkin reduced-order models based on the mori-zwanzig formalism. J Comput Phys 410:109402

  Google Scholar 

• Wehmeyer C, Noe F (2018) Time-lagged autoencoders: deep learning of slow collective variables for molecular kinetics. J Chem Phys 148(24):241703

  Google Scholar 

• Williams MO, Kevrekidis IG, Rowley CW (2015) A data-driven approximation of the koopman operator: extending dynamic mode decomposition. J Nonlinear Sci 25(6):1307–1346

  Google Scholar 

• Xie X, Webster C, Iliescu T (2020) Closure learning for nonlinear model reduction using deep residual neural network. Fluids 5(1):39

  Google Scholar 

• Xu S et al (2013) Multi-output least-squares support vector regression machines. Pattern Recognit Lett 34(9):1078–1084

  Google Scholar 

• Yousif MZ, Lim H-C (2022) Reduced-order modeling for turbulent wake of a finite wall-mounted square cylinder based on artificial neural network. Phys Fluids 34(1):015116

  Google Scholar 

• Yvonnet J, He Q-C (2007) The reduced model multiscale method (R3M) for the non-linear homogenization of hyperelastic media at finite strains. J Comput Phys 223(1):341–368

  Google Scholar 

• Zhao H (2021) A reduced order model based on machine learning for numerical analysis: an application to geomechanics. Eng Appl Artif Intell 100:104194

  Google Scholar 

• Zhu Q, Guo Y, Lin W (2021)Neural delay differential equations. In: The international conference on learning representations, p 20

  Google Scholar 

• Zwanzig R (1960)Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility. J Chem Phys 33(5):1338–1341

  Google Scholar 

Download references