Abstract
George Kelly’s professional focus was on supporting people who were struggling with the stresses of their lives. Finding that the Freudian ideas he had been offered as tools in his own professional training offered little in working towards change with many of his clients, Kelly developed his own approach based upon a constructivist perspective of learning (which he called constructive alternativism) centred on the core metaphor of person-as-scientist. People, like good scientists, should always be open to exploring new data and considering alternative explanations and conceptions, rather than becoming fixed in established ways of thinking. Kelly’s work developed into a recognised approach in psychology, and became very influential in at least one school of thought in science education. Kelly did not only offer a theory that could support clinical practice for therapists, but also offered a methodology for exploring a learner’s developing thinking. In his own educational work, he found that his approach offered insights into teachers’ classroom difficulties. This chapter considers the core ideas of Kelly’s theory in comparison with other constructivist perspectives employed in science education. The chapter also discusses how Kelly’s personal construct theory can inform classroom teaching and reflects on an approach that explicitly expects people to behave scientifically as a perspective on science teaching and learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adbo, K., & Taber, K. S. (2014). Developing an understanding of chemistry: A case study of one Swedish student’s rich conceptualisation for making sense of upper secondary school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1107–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.844869.
Brock, R. (2015). Intuition and insight: Two concepts that illuminate the tacit in science education. Studies in Science Education, 51(2), 127–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2015.1049843.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage Books.
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105–225.
Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist?. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
Fransella, F., & Bannister, D. (1977). A manual for repertory grid technique. London: Academic Press.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 61–98.
Glasersfeld, E. V. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23–38). Hilsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Huxley, T. H. (1870). Biogenesis and abiogenesis. In Collected essays (Vol. VIII, Critiques and Addresses, pp. 229–271).
Kelly, G. (1958/1969a). Clinical psychology and personality: The selected papers of George Kelly. In B. Maher (Ed.), Clinical psychology and personality: The selected papers of George Kelly (pp. 46–65). New York: Wiley.
Kelly, G. (1958/1969b). Man’s construction of his alternatives. In B. Maher (Ed.), Clinical psychology and personality: The selected papers of George Kelly (pp. 66–93). New York: Wiley.
Kelly, G. (1961/1969). A mathematical approach to psychology. In B. Maher (Ed.), Clinical psychology and personality: The selected papers of George Kelly (pp. 94–113). New York: Wiley.
Kelly, G. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Kelly, G. (1964/1969). The strategy of psychological research. In B. Maher (Ed.), Clinical psychology and personality: The selected papers of George Kelly (pp. 114–132). New York: Wiley.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Piaget, J. (1959/2002). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Piaget, J. (1970/1972). The principles of genetic epistemology (W. Mays, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pope, M. L. (1982). Personal construction of formal knowledge. Interchange, 13(4), 3–14.
Pope, M., & Watts, M. (1988). Constructivist goggles: Implications for process in teaching and learning physics. European Journal of Physics, 9, 101–109.
Popper, K. R. (1989). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (5th ed.). London: Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (1994). The myth of the framework. In M. A. Notturno (Ed.), The Myth of the framework: In defence of science and rationality (pp. 33–64). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Russell, T., & Osborne, J. (1993). Constructivist research, curriculum development and practice in primary classrooms: Reflections on five years of activity in the science processes and concept exploration (SPACE) project. In Paper Presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions in the Learning of Science and Mathematics. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Shapin, S. (1992). Why the public ought to understand science-in-the-making. Public Understanding of Science, 1(1), 27–30.
Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1–19.
Taber, K. S. (1994). Can Kelly’s triads be used to elicit aspects of chemistry students’ conceptual frameworks? In Paper Presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Oxford. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001482.htm.
Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2011). The natures of scientific thinking: Creativity as the handmaiden to logic in the development of public and personal knowledge. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in the nature of science research—Concepts and methodologies (pp. 51–74). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2013a). A common core to chemical conceptions: learners’ conceptions of chemical stability, change and bonding. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 391–418). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2013b). Classroom-based research and evidence-based practice: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Taber, K. S. (2013c). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2014a). The significance of implicit knowledge in teaching and learning chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00124A.
Taber, K. S. (2014b). Student thinking and learning in science: Perspectives on the nature and development of learners’ ideas. New York: Routledge.
Taber, K. S. (2015). The role of conceptual integration in understanding and learning chemistry. In Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 375–394): Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Taber, K. S. (2016). ‘Chemical reactions are like hell because…’: Asking gifted science learners to be creative in a curriculum context that encourages convergent thinking. In M. K. Demetrikopoulos & J. L. Pecore (Eds.), Interplay of creativity and giftedness in science (pp. 321–349). Rotterdam: Sense.
Taber, K. S. (2019). The nature of the chemical concept: Constructing chemical knowledge in teaching and learning. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Taber, K. S., & Student, T. A. (2003). How was it for you?: The dialogue between researcher and colearner. Westminster Studies in Education, 26(1), 33–44.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1986). Thought and language. London: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Ziman, J. (1978/1991). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Further Reading
Further Reading
Bannister, D., & Fransella, F. (1986). Inquiring man: The psychology of personal constructs (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Kelly, G. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taber, K.S. (2020). Constructive Alternativism: George Kelly’s Personal Construct Theory. In: Akpan, B., Kennedy, T.J. (eds) Science Education in Theory and Practice. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43619-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43620-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)