Skip to main content

Small-Scale Fisheries Take Centre-Stage in Europe (Once Again)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Small-Scale Fisheries in Europe: Status, Resilience and Governance

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 23))

Abstract

Small-scale fisheries in Europe have historically rarely received the attention they deserve. Fishery scholars and policy makers worldwide have until recently paid scant attention to the diversity of the fisheries sector, or to the existence of small-scale fleets and their fishing communities. For far too long, small-scale fishing activity has been obscured by a focus on medium or large-scale fleets, idealised as being more modern, technologically advanced and more profitable. However, resource crises in some fisheries and increasing concerns about unsustainable practices and subsidies have put small-scale fisheries in Europe, and beyond, centre stage once again. This chapter introduces 25 country studies about small-scale fisheries in Europe, written by authors from different academic fields as well as by practitioners. Here, we provide insights into the backgrounds of small-scale fisheries in Europe, linking them to prevailing policy approaches, such as the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). We argue that small-scale fisheries in Europe are diverse, complex and dynamic, and show various levels of resilience. The evidence collected in this book will help people to understand the range of challenges small-scale fisheries face and how these might be overcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Its most recent update (REGULATION (EU) No 1380/2013) took effect on 1st January 2014, with the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 2014-2020 (EMFF, REGULATION (EU) No 508/2014) integrating the various regulations for funding.

  2. 2.

    Searches performed in Web of Science, August 22 2019, 09:30:00 CET. It is relevant to note that small-scale fisheries have alternatively been named inshore fisheries (Symes and Phillipson 2001) or artisanal fisheries (García-Flórez et al. 2014). We have combined these terms in the TOPIC search (to find hits in titles, abstracts, authors’ keywords, and more) using the following syntaxis (all databases, all years): (“small-scale fish∗”) OR (“artisanal fish∗”) OR (“inshore fish∗”) OR (“small-scale coastal fish∗”) OR (“coastal fish∗”) OR (“local fish∗”). More sophisticated searches are possible in this and other databases (Google Scholar with a similar search strategy provides 18,100 hits), but the tendency looks to be very similar.

  3. 3.

    As stated in Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of the European Fisheries Fund: “1. For the purpose of this Article, ‘small-scale coastal fishing’ means fishing carried out by fishing vessels of an overall length of less than 12 metres and not using towed gear as listed in Table 3 in Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 26/2004 of 30 December 2003 regarding the fishing vessels register of the Community”, https://goo.gl/FuX2iQ. In Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the same definition and table are cited.

  4. 4.

    See: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:005:0025:0035:EN:PDF

  5. 5.

    Some of these caveats about the EU definition of small-scale fisheries may be solved in the near future, as the discussions in the European Parliament of the draft report of the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 2021–2027 includes shell-fishers on foot in the definition.

  6. 6.

    https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/sites/fisheries/files/docs/publications/2016-small-scale-coastal-fleet_en.pdf. Accessed August 22th 2019.

  7. 7.

    REGULATION (EU) No 1380/2013, Article 17. “Criteria for the allocation of fishing opportunities by Member States . When allocating the fishing opportunities available to them, as referred to in Article 16, Member States shall use transparent and objective criteria including those of an environmental, social and economic nature. The criteria to be used may include, inter alia, the impact of fishing on the environment, the history of compliance , the contribution to the local economy and historic catch levels. Within the fishing opportunities allocated to them, Member States shall endeavour to provide incentives to fishing vessels deploying selective fishing gear or using fishing techniques with reduced environmental impact, such as reduced energy consumption or habitat damage.”

  8. 8.

    For instance, recital num. 19 of the CFP states that: “(…) Member States should endeavour to give preferential access for small-scale, artisanal or coastal fishermen” (Regulation (EU) num. 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11th December, 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, initial considerations). Objectives 5f and 5i (Article 2) also aim to preserve and encourage coastal fisheries, bearing in mind socio-economic aspects.

  9. 9.

    See for instance, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A390%3AFIN

References

  • Ansola Fernández A (1998) Pesca de bajura y capitalismo: un proceso complejo y unas relaciones peculiares. Sociol Trab 35:57–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbex JC (2016) Los bacalaos y el Tratado de Utrecht: un conflicto entre potencias con el peor desenlace. Itsas memoria 8:771–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck M (2011) The megaengineering of ocean fisheries: a century of expansion and rapidly closing frontiers. In: Brunn SD (ed) Engineering Earth: the impacts of megaengineering projects. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9920-4_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck M, Jentoft S, Pascual-Fernández JJ et al (2015) Interactive coastal governance: the role of pre-modern fisher organizations in improving governability. Ocean Coast Manag 117:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell E (2014) Opportunities and contradictions in maritime heritage and small-scale fishing-a case study of Catalonia. Coll Antropol 38:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter G, Kleinjans R (2017) Who gets to fish? the allocation of fishing opportunities in EU member states. New Economics Foundation, London. https://bit.ly/2ltVWwo. Accessed 2 Sept 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho N, Edwards-Jones G, Isidro E (2011) Defining scale in fisheries: small versus large-scale fishing operations in the Azores. Fish Res 109:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2011.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S (2007) Step zero for fisheries co-management: what precedes implementation. Mar Policy 31:657–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee R, Pauly D (2008) Small is beautiful? a database approach for global assessment of small-scale fisheries: preliminary results and hypotheses. In: American Fisheries Society (ed) Reconciling fisheries with conservation: proceedings of the fourth world fisheries Congress. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 575–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee R, Liguori L, Palomares MLD et al (2006) Bottom-up, global estimates of small-scale marine fisheries catches. Fish Cent Res Rep 14(8):1–94. https://bit.ly/2KMF4x1. Accessed 28 Apr 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee R, Pascual-Fernández JJ, Szeliánszky E et al (2013) Marine protected areas: re-thinking their inception. Mar Policy 39:234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copes P (1981) The impact of Unclos-III on management of the world’s fisheries. Mar Policy 5:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis RI (2009) Umami and the foods of classical antiquity. Am J Clin Nutr 90:712S–718S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.27462C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies P, Williams C, Carpenter G et al (2018) Does size matter? assessing the use of vessel length to manage fisheries in England. Mar Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.013

  • De la Cruz Modino R (2012) Turismo, pesca y gestión de recursos. Aportaciones desde La Restinga y L’Estartit. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandson JM, Rick TC (2010) Archaeology meets marine ecology: the antiquity of maritime cultures and human impacts on marine fisheries and ecosystems. Annu Rev Mar Sci 2:231–251. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2012) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2727e.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2019

  • FAO (2015) Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4356e.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/i5555e/I5555E.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) the state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018 – Meeting the sustainable development goals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/i9540en/I9540EN.pdf Accessed 27 Apr 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson AC, McCay BJ (1998) Crossing the threshold of ecosystem resilience: the commercial extinction of northern cod. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 311–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Florido del Corral D (2005) Evolución histórica y cultural de las almadrabas en el litoral atlántico meridional (siglos XVI–XX). Museu de la Pesca, Girona

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangoudes K (2013) Women in fisheries: a european perspective. European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Fisheries (IP/B/PECH/IC/2013-048, PE 513.965), Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangoudes K, Bellanger M (2017) Fishers’ opinions on marketization of property rights and the quota system in France. Mar Policy 80:107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangoudes K, Marugán-Pintos B, Pascual-Fernández JJ (2013) Gender in Galician shell-fisheries: transforming for governability. In: Bavinck M, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S, Kooiman J (eds) Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: theory and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 241–261

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • García Vargas E, Florido del Corral D (2010) The Origin and Development of Tuna Fishing Nets (Almadrabas). In: Bekker-Nielsen T, Bernal Casasola D (eds) Ancient nets and fishing gear: proceedings of the International Workshop on Nets and Fishing Gear in Classical Antiquity: a first approach: Cádiz, November 15–17, 2007. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz – Aarhus University Press, Cadiz – Aarhus, pp 205–228

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Flórez L, Morales J, Gaspar MB et al (2014) A novel and simple approach to define artisanal fisheries in Europe. Mar Policy 44:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordoa A, Dedeu AL, Boada J (2019) Recreational fishing in Spain: first national estimates of fisher population size, fishing activity and fisher social profile. Fish Res 211:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goti-Aralucea L (2019) Assessing the social and economic impact of small scale fisheries management measures in a marine protected area with limited data. Mar Policy 101:246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm P (2012) World War II and the “Great Acceleration” of North Atlantic Fisheries. Global Environ 5:66–91. https://doi.org/10.3197/ge.2012.051005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta e Costa B, Batista MI, Gonçalves L et al (2013) Fishers’ behaviour in response to the implementation of a marine protected area. PLOS One 8:e65057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyder K, Weltersbach MS, Armstrong M et al (2018) Recreational sea fishing in Europe in a global context—Participation rates, fishing effort, expenditure, and implications for monitoring and assessment. Fish Fish 19:225–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH et al (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, Wadel C (1984a) I samme båt: sysselsettingssystemer i fiskerinæringen. Universitetsforlaget, Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, Wadel C (1984b) Sysselsettingssystem som analytisk begrep. In: I samme båt: sysselsettingssystemer i fiskerinæringen. Universitetsforlaget, Stavanger, pp 180–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R, Franz N et al (eds) (2017) The small-scale fisheries guidelines: global implementation. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lear WH (1998) History of fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic: the 500-year perspective. J Northwest Atl Fish Sci 23:41–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke S, Jentoft S (2014) Exploring the phronetic dimension of stakeholders’ knowledge in EU fisheries governance. Mar Policy 47:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lögfren O (1984) The making of a fisherman: the social context of socialization in a Swedish fishing community. In: Gunda BE (ed) The fishing culture of the world. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp 281–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze HK, Coll M, Dunne JA (2011) Historical changes in marine resources, food-web structure and ecosystem functioning in the Adriatic Sea, Mediterranean. Ecosystems 14:198–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9404-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallol S, Goñi R (2019) Unintended changes of artisanal fisheries métiers upon implementation of an MPA. Mar Policy 101:237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynou F, Morales-Nin B, Cabanellas-Reboredo M et al (2013) Small-scale fishery in the Balearic Islands (W Mediterranean): a socio-economic approach. Fish Res 139:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGoodwin JR (1990) Crisis in the world’s fisheries: people, problems, and policies. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Merino G, Morales-Nin B, Maynou F et al (2008) Assessment and bioeconomic analysis of the Majorca (NW Mediterranean) trammel net fishery. Aquat Living Resour 21:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2008027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller ML, Maanen JV (1982) Getting into fishing: observations on the social identities of New England fishermen. Urban Life 11:27–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemec TF (1972) I fish with my brother: the structure and behavior of an agnatic-based fishing crews in a Newfoundland Irish outport. In: Andersen R, Wadel C (eds) North Atlantic fishermen: anthropological essays on modern fishing. I.S.E.R. Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, pp 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ounanian K, Hegland TJ (2012) The Regional Advisory Councils’ current capacities and unforeseen benefits. Mar Stud 11:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2212-9790-11-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual Fernández J (1991) Entre el mar y la tierra. Los pescadores artesanales canarios. Ministerio de Cultura – Interinsular Canaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Fernandez JJ, De la Cruz MR (2011) Conflicting gears, contested territories: MPAs as a solution? In: Chuenpagdee R (ed) World small-scale fisheries contemporary visions. Eburon, Delft, pp 205–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Fernández JJ, De la Cruz Modino R, Chuenpagdee R et al (2018) Synergy as strategy: learning from La Restinga, Canary Islands. Mar Stud 17:85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0091-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Fernández JJ, Pita C, Josupeit H et al (2019) Markets, distribution, and value chains in small-scale fisheries: a special focus on Europe. In: Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S (eds) Transdisciplinarity for small-scale fisheries governance. Analysis and practice. Springer, Cham, pp 141–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D (1997) Small-scale fisheries in the tropics: marginality, marginalization, and some implications for fisheries management. In: Pikitch EK, Huppert DD, Sissenwine MP (eds) Global trends: fisheries management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 40–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D (2006) Major trends in small-scale marine fisheries, with emphasis on developing countries, and some implications for the social sciences. MAST 4:7–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Christensen V, Guénette S et al (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penas Lado E (2016) The Common Fisheries Policy: the quest for sustainability. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips CR (2001) The life blood of the Navy’: recruiting sailors in eighteenth-century Spain. Mariner’s Mirror 87:420–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2001.10656814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher TJ, Lam ME (2015) Fish commoditization and the historical origins of catching fish for profit. Mar Stud 14:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-014-0014-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford Z, Hyder K, Zarauz L et al (2018) The impact of marine recreational fishing on key fish stocks in European waters. Plos One 13:16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C (2007) The unnatural history of the sea. Island Pres – Shearwater Books, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddle K, Satria A (2010) Managing coastal and inland waters: pre-existing aquatic management systems in Southeast Asia. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Said A, Tzanopoulos J, MacMillan D (2016) Bluefin tuna fishery policy in Malta: the plight of artisanal fishermen caught in the capitalist net. Mar Policy 73:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala E, Mayorga J, Costello C et al (2018) The economics of fishing the high seas. Sci Adv 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat2504

  • Salas S, Barragán-Paladines MJ, Chuenpagdee R (eds) (2018) Viability and sustainability of small-scale fisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santana Talavera A (1997) Antropología y turismo: ¿Nuevas hordas, viejas culturas? Ariel, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos AN (2015) Fisheries as a way of life: gendered livelihoods, identities and perspectives of artisanal fisheries in eastern Brazil. Mar Policy 62:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuhbauer A, Chuenpagdee R, Cheung WWL et al (2017) How subsidies affect the economic viability of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 82:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner MS (2012) Norwegian euroscepticism: values, identity or interest. J Common Mark Stud 50:422–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02245.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sønvisen SA, Johnsen JP, Vik J (2011) The norwegian coastal employment system: what it was and what it is. MAST 10:31–56

    Google Scholar 

  • STECF (Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries) (2018) The 2018 annual economic report on the EU fishing fleet (STECF 18-07). Publications Office of the European Union. https://bit.ly/2lPXmkV. Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/56158. Accessed 11 Nov 2018

  • Stoffle BW, Stoffle RW (2007) At the sea’s edge: Elders and children in the littorals of Barbados and the Bahamas. Hum Ecol 35:547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symes DG, Phillipson J (eds) (2001) Inshore fisheries management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson D, FAO (1988) The world’s two marine fishing industries – how they compare. NAGA Q 11:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson P, Wailey T, Lummis T (1983) Living the fishing. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Londres

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyedmers PH, Watson R, Pauly D (2005) Fueling global fishing fleets. AMBIO 34(8):635–638. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.8.635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasante S (2010) Global assessment of the European Union fishing fleet: an update. Mar Policy 34:663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank “Too Big To Ignore: Global Partnership for Small-Scale Fisheries Research” funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (grant number 895-2011-1011) and the project “Governance challenges for sustainable small-scale fisheries: creating synergies with marine conservation and tourism” (GOBAMP II, CSO2013-45773-R, financed by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain). Authors would also like to thank the COST Action CA15217 - Ocean Governance for Sustainability - challenges, options and the role of science, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). J. Pascual would also like to acknowledge Macarofood project (Valorización de productos marinos de la Macaronesia: turismo, gastronomía y capacitación profesional, Interreg-MAC/2.3d/015), with the support of European Regional Development Fund. C. Pita would also like to acknowledge FCT/MCTES national funds for its financial support to CESAM (UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José J. Pascual-Fernández .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pascual-Fernández, J.J., Pita, C., Bavinck, M. (2020). Small-Scale Fisheries Take Centre-Stage in Europe (Once Again). In: Pascual-Fernández, J., Pita, C., Bavinck, M. (eds) Small-Scale Fisheries in Europe: Status, Resilience and Governance. MARE Publication Series, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37371-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics