Presents
Associate Partner
Granthm
Education Partner
XAT
Samsung
Thursday, Jul 25, 2024
Advertisement

‘Cannot lampoon’: Supreme Court issues rules on portraying disabled persons in films

The SC said persons with disabilities “should neither be lampooned based on myths (such as, ‘blind people bump into objects in their path’) nor presented as ‘super cripples’ on the other extreme”.

‘Cannot lampoon’: SC issues rules on portraying disabled persons in filmsSC said “training and sensitization programmes should be implemented for those involved in creating visual media content”.

Creative freedom of a filmmaker under Article 19(1)(a) “cannot include the freedom to lampoon, stereotype, misrepresent or disparage those already marginalised”, the Supreme Court said Monday while laying down a “framework of portrayal of persons with disabilities in visual media that aligns with the anti-discrimination and dignity-affirming objectives of the Constitution as well as the Rights for Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016”.

The ruling came on a plea, which stated that the Hindi film Aankh Micholi misrepresented disabled persons and violated their constitutionally protected rights and the provisions of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the RPwD Act. The plea also challenged the January 15, 2024 Delhi HC order dismissing the petition, which highlighted instances in the trailer and the film misrepresenting certain medical conditions and the use of derogatory terms for characters, who are PwDs.

A bench of CJI D Y Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala said that “… if the overall message of the work infringes the rights of persons with disabilities, it is not protected speech, obviating the need for any balancing… if stereotypical/disparaging portrayal is justified by the overall message of the film, the filmmaker’s right to retain such portrayal will have to be balanced against the fundamental and statutory rights of those portrayed.”

Advertisement

The apex court said that words cultivate institutional discrimination and “terms such as “cripple” and “spastic” have come to acquire devalued meanings in societal perceptions about persons with disabilities.

Laying down the framework, the SC said, “Language that disparages persons with disabilities, marginalises them further and supplements the disabling barriers in their social participation, without the redeeming quality of the overall message of such portrayal must be approached with caution. Such representation is problematic not because it offends subjective feelings but because it impairs the objective societal treatment of the affected groups by society. We believe that representation of persons with disabilities must regard the objective social context of their representation and not marginalise persons with disability”.

Festive offer

It said that “language that individualises the impairment and overlooks the disabling social barriers (e.g. terms such as “afflicted”, “suffering”, and “victim”) should be avoided or adequately flagged as contrary to the social model”.

“Creators must check for accurate representation of a medical condition as much as possible. Misleading portrayal of what a condition such as night blindness entails may perpetuate misinformation about the condition, and entrench stereotypes about persons with such impairments, aggravating the disability,” the bench said.

Advertisement

“Visual media should strive to depict the diverse realities of persons with disabilities, showcasing not only their challenges but also their successes, talents, and contributions to society,” it said.

The SC said persons with disabilities “should neither be lampooned based on myths (such as, ‘blind people bump into objects in their path’) nor presented as ‘super cripples’ on the other extreme”. It said “training and sensitization programmes should be implemented for those involved in creating visual media content”.

Live Updates | Click here for Union Budget 2024 announcements by FM Nirmala Sitharaman | New Income Tax changes announced - check here

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

First uploaded on: 09-07-2024 at 04:35 IST
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close