Abstract
A pilot-scale (1,000 L) continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell was constructed and tested for current generation and COD removal with winery wastewater. The reactor contained 144 electrode pairs in 24 modules. Enrichment of an exoelectrogenic biofilm required ~60 days, which is longer than typically needed for laboratory reactors. Current generation was enhanced by ensuring adequate organic volatile fatty acid content (VFA/SCOD ≥ 0.5) and by raising the wastewater temperature (31 ± 1°C). Once enriched, SCOD removal (62 ± 20%) was consistent at a hydraulic retention time of 1 day (applied voltage of 0.9 V). Current generation reached a maximum of 7.4 A/m3 by the planned end of the test (after 100 days). Gas production reached a maximum of 0.19 ± 0.04 L/L/day, although most of the product gas was converted to methane (86 ± 6%). In order to increase hydrogen recovery in future tests, better methods will be needed to isolate hydrogen gas produced at the cathode. These results show that inoculation and enrichment procedures are critical to the initial success of larger-scale systems. Acetate amendments, warmer temperatures, and pH control during startup were found to be critical for proper enrichment of exoelectrogenic biofilms and improved reactor performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Call D, Logan BE (2008) Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) lacking a membrane. Environ Sci Technol 42(9):3401–3406
Call D, Merrill MD, Logan BE (2009a) High surface area stainless steel brushes as cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs). Environ Sci Technol 43(6):2179–2183
Call DF, Wagner RC, Logan BE (2009b) Hydrogen production by Geobacter species and a mixed consortium in a microbial electrolysis cell. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(24):7579–7587
Chae KJ, Choi MJ, Kim KY, Ajayi FF, Chang IS, Kim IS (2009) Selective inhibition of methanogens for the improvement of biohydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:13379–13386
Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE (2006a) Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environ Sci Technol 40:2426–2432
Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE (2006b) Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 40:364–369
Cheng S, Xing D, Call DF, Logan BE (2009) Direct biological conversion of electrons into methane by electromethanogenesis. Environ Sci Technol 43(10):3953–3958
Cheng S, Xing D, Logan BE (2010) Electricity generation of single-chamber microbial fuel cells at low temperature. Biosen Bioelectron 26:1913–1917
Clauwaert P, Verstraete W (2009) Methanogenesis in membraneless microbial electrolysis cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82(5):829–836
Cusick RD, Kiely PD, Logan BE (2010) A monetary comparison of energy recovered from microbial fuel cells and microbial electrolysis cells fed winery or domestic wastewaters. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(17):8855–8861
Ditzig J, Liu H, Logan BE (2007) Production of hydrogen from domestic wastewater using a bioelectrochemically assisted microbial reactor (BEAMR). Int J Hydrogen Energy 32(13):2296–2304
EPA, CHP (2007) Opportunities for and benefits of combined heat and power at wastewater treatment facilities. EPA-430-R-07-003, 6
Gil G-C, Chang I-S, Kim BH, Kim M, Jang J-K, Park HS, Kim HJ (2003) Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron 18(4):327–334
Kalyuzhnyi SV, Gladchenko MA, Sklyar VI, Kurakova OV, Shcherbakov SS (2000) The UASB treatment of winery wastewater under submesophilic and psychrophilic conditions. Environ Technol 21:919–925
Kiely PD, Cusick R, Call DF, Selembo PA, Regan JM, Logan BE (2011) Anode microbial communities produced by changing from microbial fuel cell to microbial electrolysis cell operation using two different wastewaters. Bioresour Technol 102(1):388–394
Liu H, Cheng S, Logan BE (2005a) Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate in a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 39(2):658–662
Liu H, Grot S, Logan BE (2005b) Electrochemically assisted microbial production of hydrogen from acetate. Environ Sci Technol 39(11):4317–4320
Liu Y, Harnisch F, Fricke K, Sietmann R, Schröder U (2008) Improvement of the anodic bioelectrocatalytic activity of mixed culture biofilms by a simple consecutive electrochemical selection procedure. Biosens Bioelectron 24(4):1006–1011
Logan BE, Cheng S, Watson V, Estadt G (2007) Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 41(9):3341–3346
Logan BE, Call D, Cheng S, Hamelers HVM, Sleutels THJA, Jeremiasse AW, Rozendal RA (2008) Microbial electrolysis cells for high yield hydrogen gas production from organic matter. Environ Sci Technol 42(23):8630–8640
Moletta R (2005) Winery and distillery wastewater treatment by anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 51(1):137–144
NIST (2008) NIST Chemistry WebBook. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/. Accessed 10 May 2010
Parkin GF, Owen WF (1986) Fundamentals of anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludges. J Environ Eng ASCE 112 (EE5):867–920
Prathap P, César IT, Hyung-Sool L, Rosa K-B, Bruce ER (2009) Syntrophic interactions among anode respiring bacteria (ARB) and non-ARB in a biofilm anode: electron balances. Biotechnol Bioeng 103(3):513–523
Rabaey K, Lissens G, Siciliano SD, Verstraete W (2003) A microbial fuel cell capable of converting glucose to electricity at high rate and efficiency. Biotechnol Lett 25(18):1531–1535
Rader GK (2010) Effect of long-term operation on MFC performance and the performance of a scale-up continuous flow MEC with an examinaion of methods to decrease CH4 production. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Rader GK, Logan BE (2010) Multi-electrode continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell for biogas production from acetate. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:8848–8854
Rozendal RA, Hamelers HVM, Euverink GJW, Metz SJ, Buisman CJN (2006) Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31(12):1632–1640
Selembo PA, Perez JM, Lloyd WA, Logan BE (2009) High hydrogen production from glycerol or glucose by electrohydrogenesis using microbial electrolysis cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34(13):5373–5381
Wagner RC, Regan JM, Oh S-E, Zuo Y, Logan BE (2009) Hydrogen and methane production from swine wastewater using microbial electrolysis cells. Water Res 43(4):1480–1488
Wang X, Cheng S, Feng Y, Merrill MD, Saito T, Logan BE (2009) The use of carbon mesh anodes and the effect of different pretreatment methods on power production in microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6870–6874
Zhang Y (2010) The use and optimization of stainless steel mesh cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Zhang X, Cheng S, Wang X, Huang X, Logan BE (2009) Separator characteristics for increasing performance of microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 43(21):8456–8461
Acknowledgments
We thank Andy Hoxsey, Sheldon Parker, Lynn Wantanabe, Stephanie Litty, and the maintenance crew of the Napa Wine Company for their tremendous support throughout this project. The authors also thank Nielson Construction for their expertise, patience, and flexibility during reactor construction and operation. This research was supported in part by Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and the Paul L. Bush award administered by the Water Environment Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Figures S1–S2
(DOC 46 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cusick, R.D., Bryan, B., Parker, D.S. et al. Performance of a pilot-scale continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell fed winery wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89, 2053–2063 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3130-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3130-9