Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revise Creation Process to conduct research and studies #587

Closed
rachaelbradley opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Revise Creation Process to conduct research and studies #587

rachaelbradley opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
only response needed issues that should be easy to close, acknowledgement only

Comments

@rachaelbradley
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is the 2nd part of Issue 227

And under Creation Process:

Pro-actively conduct research and studies with a cross section of all users to validate the usefulness and effect of guidelines, methods, and practices. Recruiting a diverse range of people to include not only those the guideline is intended to help, but also a group recruited from all users to fully understand the helpful impact and utility of the method or guideline. This recognizes the importance of user contributions toward advancing these standards, as well as improving the protection and inclusivity of accessibility tooling and procedures.

@Myndex
Copy link
Member

Myndex commented Jul 9, 2022

Hi Rachael,

Just to mention, related to this subject is the potential need for setting up some form of an institutional review board to provide at least basic oversight of studies. While I don't think that the kinds of studies envisioned here would require registration at clinicalTrials.gov, many journals do require that human studies, even observational (non-intervention), must register at clinicalTrials.gov before enrolling participants, in order to published the results. And clinicalTrials.gov implies that such studies need approval from the institutional review board.

Here's a checklist form, regarding if one must register.

Human Subjects Review

Definition: Studies must have approval (or be exempt, as appropriate) from a Human Subjects Protection Review Board prior to the enrollment of the first participant to be eligible for registration. A study may be submitted for registration prior to approval by the review board so long as the study is not yet recruiting participants.

At a minimum, appropriate informed consent needs to be part of the process. For simple observational studies that are non-interventional, the needed ICF is probably simple, such as the one I wrote for PercepTex.

APPENDIX:

clinicalTrials.gov

The US NIH clearing house for registering clinical studies and trials.

GLOSSARY

Clinical study

A research study involving human volunteers (also called participants) that is intended to add to medical knowledge. There are two types of clinical studies: interventional studies (also called clinical trials) and observational studies.

Human subjects protection review board

A group of people who review, approve, and monitor the clinical study's protocol. Their role is to protect the rights and welfare of people participating in a study (referred to as human research subjects), such as reviewing the informed consent form. The group typically includes people with varying backgrounds, including a community member, to make sure that research activities conducted by an organization are completely and adequately reviewed.
Also called an institutional review board, or IRB, or an ethics committee.

Observational study

A type of clinical study in which participants are identified as belonging to study groups and are assessed for biomedical or health outcomes. Participants are not assigned to a specific intervention/treatment. A patient registry is a type of observational study.

Observational study model

The general design of the strategy for identifying and following up with participants during an observational study. Types of observational study models include cohort, case-control, case-only, case-cross-over, ecologic or community studies, family-based, and other.

@alastc
Copy link
Contributor

alastc commented Jan 30, 2024

Approved response:


Our general process is to start from the available research and lived experiences of people with disabilities to form guidelines. There are occasions where additional research is needed, but this is not the default process, and would not be added as a requirement or statement of standard practice.

@alastc alastc added the only response needed issues that should be easy to close, acknowledgement only label Feb 6, 2024
@alastc alastc closed this as completed Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
only response needed issues that should be easy to close, acknowledgement only
3 participants