Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README to better reflect purpose of this repo #5

Open
matthewmturner opened this issue Mar 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Update README to better reflect purpose of this repo #5

matthewmturner opened this issue Mar 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@matthewmturner
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
(This section helps Arrow developers understand the context and why for this feature, in addition to the what)

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@matthewmturner matthewmturner added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 17, 2022
@Dandandan
Copy link
Contributor

The benefit of keeping the current structure is that

  • We can keep it up to data with upstream datafusion
  • We run the entire datafusion test suite
  • We can eventually merge this back into datafusion

The current tokomak README.md is located here:
https://github.com/datafusion-contrib/datafusion-tokomak/tree/main/tokomak

@matthewmturner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Makes sense, thanks!

@Dandandan
Copy link
Contributor

I wanted to suggest to keep the issue open. Maybe there is a smart way of dealing with this, such as making the default branch not the development branch or doing something smart with the README location.
Suggestions welcome :).

@matthewmturner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok got it - ill think on it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
2 participants