Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
64,416
32,243


Samsung today announced the launch of its latest portable SSD, the T5 EVO with up to 8TB of storage space available. 8TB is the largest capacity size offered by portable SSDs on the market.

samsung-t5-ssd.jpg

The T5 Evo supports USB 3.2 Gen 1 speeds for transferring data at up to 460MB/s. That's much faster than standard hard drives, but slower than NVME SSDs like Samsung's T7 and T9 series.

Samsung designed the T5 with a rectangular body that has a clip able to be attached to luggage and backpacks, and it features drop protection up to six feet thanks to a rubberized surface. Samsung has also included Dynamic Thermal Guard technology to protect against overheating.

The SSD measures in at 3.74 inches in length and 1.57 inches in width, and it weighs 3.6 ounces, so it is portable and ideal for travel.

The 8TB version of the T5 EVO SSD is priced at $650, and it can be purchased from the Samsung website. Samsung is also offering 2TB and 4TB versions, priced at $190 and $350, respectively.

Note: MacRumors is an affiliate partner with Samsung. When you click a link and make a purchase, we may receive a small payment, which helps us keep the site running.

Article Link: Samsung Announces 8TB T5 EVO Portable SSD
 
Last edited:

HobeSoundDarryl

macrumors G5
Links don't appear to be right (ifixit right to repair article???) but it's dazzling that 8TB can be jammed into a 1.57 x 3.74 x .67 inches EXTERNAL case. Wow!

As a point of reference, the original iPod with its whopping 5GB of storage measured 4.02 x 2.43 x 0.78 inches. I had one of those and couldn't believe so much music could be stored in so little space.
 
Last edited:

HobeSoundDarryl

macrumors G5
$650 for 8TB of storage from Samsung. If this was Apple, it'd be well over $2,400

View attachment 2312367

Now, we all know that Apple's 8TB is far superior to anyone else's 8TB.

Fans will argue 8TB > 8TB with vigor.

In Apple Exec spin: "Apple's 8TB is like 32TB of this Samsung storage... so buyers are actually saving $200 by paying $2400." ;)
 
Last edited:

The_Gream

macrumors regular
Jul 16, 2020
226
546
$650 for 8TB of storage from Samsung. If this was Apple, it'd be well over $2,400

View attachment 2312367
These are definitely not the types of SSDs you can compare to what you find in an Apple device/computer. 460MB/s is slow (USB 2/lightning cable slow). The quality and read/write on Apple’s 2.4k (edit - for typo error) up/over charged SSD is ~5-10x the rate, if not more.
 
Last edited:

Wildkraut

Suspended
Nov 8, 2015
3,583
7,674
Germany
These are definitely not the types of SSDs you can compare to what you find in an Apple device/computer. 460MB/s is slow (USB 2/lightning cable slow). The quality and read/write on Apple’s 2.4k up charger SSD is ~5-10x the rate
That 8TB ssd you get for $800-$1000 incl. enclosure, probably even less if you raid them together.

Still a lot cheaper than the $2400 Apple Tax, which is an upgrade price on top of the sdd you’re leaving with Apple to be sold.
 
Last edited:

loekf

macrumors 6502a
Mar 23, 2015
829
572
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
These are definitely not the types of SSDs you can compare to what you find in an Apple device/computer. 460MB/s is slow (USB 2/lightning cable slow). The quality and read/write on Apple’s 2.4k up charger SSD is ~5-10x the rate

Depends on whether they mean 480 MB/s or 480 Mbps. 480 Mbps is the maximum USB 2.0 speed. 480 MB/s or ~5 Gbps was the original USB 3.0 speed.
 

mectojic

macrumors 65816
Dec 27, 2020
1,237
2,381
Sydney, Australia
Do these external SSDs use multiple NANDs, like Apple's internal SSDs? If so, is a 8TB model like 16x512gb nands? I don't know how these work tbh.
 

Any name

Cancelled
Aug 9, 2023
121
149
Now, we all know that Apple's 8TB is far superior to anyone else's 8TB. Fans will argue 8TB > 8TB with vigor.

Or in Apple Exec spin: "Apple's 8TB is like 32TB of this Samsung storage... so buyers are actually saving $200 by paying $2400." ;)
Apple’s is superior because it uses compression
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Shirasaki

ChrisA

macrumors G5
Jan 5, 2006
12,747
1,911
Redondo Beach, California
Depends on whether they mean 480 MB/s or 480 Mbps. 480 Mbps is the maximum USB 2.0 speed. 480 MB/s or ~5 Gbps was the original USB 3.0 speed.
The Samsung website says this

Key Features
Sequential Read Speed. Up to 460 MB/s
Sequential Write Speed. Up to 460 MB/s

The same Samsung site also sells the "T9" for a similar price but with a maximum size of "only" 4GB and claims

sustained read and write speeds of up to 2,000MB/s
 

bradman83

macrumors 65816
Oct 29, 2020
1,096
2,724
Buffalo, NY
Do these external SSDs use multiple NANDs, like Apple's internal SSDs? If so, is a 8TB model like 16x512gb nands? I don't know how these work tbh.
Yes external SSDs use multiple NAND chips. What varies is how the chips talk to the USB interface. This drive most likely uses a SATA-3 to USB bridge chip which explains the fairly slow speeds relative to enclosures that use NMVe to USB bridge chips.
 

Shirasaki

macrumors P6
May 16, 2015
15,910
11,279
$650 for 8TB of storage from Samsung. If this was Apple, it'd be well over $2,400

View attachment 2312367
Not to mention Apple DOES NOT manufacture those NAND chips themselves. And their chips probably also from Samsung.
Now, we all know that Apple's 8TB is far superior to anyone else's 8TB.

Fans will argue 8TB > 8TB with vigor.

In Apple Exec spin: "Apple's 8TB is like 32TB of this Samsung storage... so buyers are actually saving $200 by paying $2400." ;)
Lmao.
I can almost see Apple sticking with 8TB as top of the line storage for a decade while everyone else moves on to 256 TB internal storage as their high end options.
Apple’s is superior because it uses compression
What compression? Physically cram more electrons into a single cell to save more data or just use software trickery to save space? Secret HLD chips nobody else have? 6 voltage states in a single cell while also maintaining 10000+ P/E cycles? If that is the case, then ok, they can charge a lot.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: thingstoponder
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.