A continuación, te explicamos cómo puedes ofrecer comentarios impactantes sobre el rendimiento del diseño.

To make impactfull feedback, must have complete knowledge in all side, hand on skill/ competency, years proven experiences and the last ones most important, honest coming from the deepest heart.

At the beginning of each design is a problem that needs solving. It is important to Identify and understand the problem that the design is trying to solve and by whom this problem is relevant before embarking on feedback.

In my experience, a "Project Charter" having the context, demand information and business case information is an ideal document to familiarize with objectives, constraints and the rationale behind design decisions. Another thing that can help in impactful feedback is having construction and operations/customers personnel part of the design review. While construction personnel deal with implications of design, operations/customers ultimately use the design.

In my profession feedback comes visually. So as visual notes around the 'Co-visual in progress'. Easy and fun! Simple and practical.

En contexto es fundamental la concepción y evaluación de las solicitaciones, que se presentan para la concepción modular y complementar con las estimaciones en el proceso de ingeniería y los sistemas colaborativos, de manera especifica se pueden presentar para su evaluación y aprobación. SMP.

Feedback and comments should be SMART. S in SMART stands for being specific. That is one of the pillars of efficiency including in feedbacks as part of the design process.

Specificity always gives clarity on what to do. It always give clear understanding of improvement...so improvements done in less time

¡¡¡...Evaluación de las matrices de estimación de riesgos, como etapa preliminar, para tener un diagnostico del estado situacional, como componente en su concepción inicial...!!!

Before you start your project designing and development, ensure that you have specified the objective you aim to achieve via the project. Hence, during project performance evaluation, do well to revisit those pre establish objectives, and evaluate the project on the basics of achieved objectives. All shortcomings of the project should be specifically documented.

The deeper you trace, the more specific your solution. Proper troubleshooting should not be replaced with assumptions based on past occurrences. Past experience should be utilized in arriving at the solution but should not replace knowing the root cause of the present problem.

Precisamente en ese orden de ideas se podría desarrollar los aspectos de resiliencia una vez conceptuado el diseño y los probables efectos, post construcción y/o propósitos de su materialización y su sostenibilidad en el tiempo

To every project there are always 2 sides: Merits & Demerits. It is crucial for one to be able to balance all stakes keeping in mind that measurables vs time determine the outcomes of any project. Analytical prowess is vital in pointing out where the project is headed based on selected variables-budget,time,resources,manpower,machinery.

positive feedback with constructive criticism maintains morale and encourages improvement. Recognizing successful elements and identifying flaws helps establish design standards and motivates teams to think wider and create their best practices.

When you provide solutions as feedback on a design, it can significantly impact its performance by addressing specific issues and enhancing its functionality. By offering actionable suggestions based on technical analysis, you can pinpoint areas for improvement, optimize user interactions, and ultimately elevate the design's effectiveness. This targeted approach helps refine the design process and ensures that the final product meets its objectives more effectively.

Emphasize on problem doesn't work, but Providing actionable suggestions help the design teams understand and implement improvements.

With proper understanding about the problem in hand we can give feedbacks based on our level of knowledge and experience. But it should be constructive. The team should be involved in the discussions and should be encouraged for their work. This could also toss new ideas and perspectives which was not perceived before.

Design review process is most efficient when it is a 2 way dialogue. First to understand the designer's point of view which may assist in design process. Second, to confirm that the feed back was understood correctly by the designer. This is one of the pillars of positive communication technique.

Top-down critics don't work. Fostering a two-way conversation, allowing the designer to explain their choices and ask questions.

To complete the design process most productively, a follow up session is required for both parties to be satisfied with the design outcomes, or provide an action plan to complete the design to comply with the project specifications.

To deliver impactful feedback to one’s resources, it is important to bear in mind the growth and development, both personally and professionally of that resource. As leader, I focus on, observing a resource’s behaviour and set clear expectations, providing examples, and encourage self-reflection. The feedback should be specific, prompt, and meaningful, and have a significant impact on the resource's behaviour, performance, or perspective. Highlight clearly what tasks was done well or needs improvement and focus on specific behaviours or actions. Aim on observable facts, not personal biases. Constructiveness should be aimed at improving performance, not criticising. Also, provide concrete suggestions for improvement, respectfully.

Design performance to be assessed with respect to realistic specification/s with cost competitiveness/ optimisation. So it is important to have a valid specification with demonstration procedures…

Always ensure you use first principles as a foundation for any comment, follow up, or solution. Without data and numbers, it is just opinion. Once you quantify something, it is objective.

Price vs Quality : One thing that must be confirmed from the user is their priority. Some user wanted to have high quality and performance, but have limited budget.

Additional points for impactful design feedback: 💡 Align with goals: Ensure your feedback aligns with the project's goals and target audience. Does the design effectively meet the user's needs and achieve the desired outcome ? 💡 Context matters: Provide context for your feedback. Explain how the design fits into the larger project or product ecosystem.