Prognostic implication of lung ultrasound in heart failure: pooled analysis of international cohorts

Rastogi, T. et al. (2024) Prognostic implication of lung ultrasound in heart failure: pooled analysis of international cohorts. European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging, (doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae099) (PMID:38606932) (Early Online Publication)

[img] Text
323933.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 12 April 2025.

2MB

Abstract

Aims: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is often used to assess congestion in heart failure (HF). In this study, we assessed the prognostic role of LUS in patients with HF at admission and hospital discharge, and in an outpatient setting, and explored whether clinical factors [age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and atrial fibrillation] impact the prognostic value of LUS findings. Further, we assessed the incremental prognostic value of LUS on top of the following two clinical risk scores: (i) the atrial fibrillation, haemoglobin, elderly, abnormal renal parameters, diabetes mellitus (AHEAD) and (ii) the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) clinical risk scores. Methods and results: We pooled data on patients hospitalized for HF or followed up in outpatient clinics from international cohorts. We enrolled 1947 patients at admission (n = 578), discharge (n = 389), and in outpatient clinics (n = 980). The total LUS B-line count was calculated for the eight-zone scanning protocol. The primary outcome was a composite of rehospitalization for HF and all-cause death. Compared with those in the lower tertiles of B lines, patients in the highest tertiles were older, more likely to have signs of HF and had higher N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. A higher number of B lines was associated with increased risk of primary outcome at discharge [Tertile 3 vs. Tertile 1: adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 5.74 (3.26–10.12), P < 0.0001] and in outpatients [Tertile 3 vs. Tertile 1: adjusted HR: 2.66 (1.08–6.54), P = 0.033]. Age and LVEF did not influence the prognostic capacity of LUS in different clinical settings. Adding B-line count to the MAGGIC and AHEAD scores improved net reclassification significantly in all three clinical settings. Conclusion: A higher number of B lines in patients with HF was associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, regardless of the clinical setting.

Item Type:Articles
Keywords:Cardiovascular diseases, heart failure, Lung ultrasound, Cardiac oedema, B-lines, prognosis.
Status:Early Online Publication
Refereed:Yes
Glasgow Author(s) Enlighten ID:Pellicori, Dr Pierpaolo
Authors: Rastogi, T., Gargani, L., Pellicori, P., Lamiral, Z., Ambrosio, G., Bayés-Genis, A., Domingo, M., Lupon, J., Simonovic, D., Riccardo Pugliese, N., Ruocco, G., Duarte, K., Coiro, S., Palazzuoli, A., and Girerd, N.
College/School:College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences > School of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health
Journal Name:European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher:Oxford University Press
ISSN:2047-2404
ISSN (Online):2047-2412
Published Online:12 April 2024
Copyright Holders:Copyright © The Author(s) 2024
First Published:First published in European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging 2024
Publisher Policy:Reproduced in accordance with the publisher copyright policy

University Staff: Request a correction | Enlighten Editors: Update this record