Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Serbian Christmas meal.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2015 at 13:34:19 (UTC)
- Reason
- Good Resolution + EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Serbian cuisine, Serbian Christmas traditions +2
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink
- Creator
- Petar Milošević
- Support as nominator – National Names 2000 (talk) 13:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Did put some work on Gastronomy, it is not presented as it should be. --PetarM (talk) 16:19, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Looks good. Could use a bit of denoising, but it's not so bad as to be required. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Also, it seems to me that there were some focus stacking errors on the wine glasses. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Crisco 1492 I can answer if you put notation on that spot, but some smudges are in real. --PetarM (talk) 18:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Added two notes. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sharp eye you have. I did check on originals. Saw those lines (left cup) in that part also in originals. But really seems like mistake. Somekind refraction-diffraction ligth play, or even lines from white linen. Maybe the Braggs law come to enforce. Here they are, unprocessed. one and the other one --PetarM (talk) 20:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- The left one seems to be in the original. The right one does appear to be a focus stack error (much sharper in your unprocessed example). Those drove me crazy when I was creating such images as File:Unidentified rose, Yogyakarta, 2014-11-12.jpg; it required a lot of toying with things in Helicon Focus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Some parts migth have minor softnes, like in flower. Its not easy task to go manually. Especially when so many edges are - flower. --PetarM (talk) 08:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Agree. Here, it's barely noticeable, so I don't mind. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Some parts migth have minor softnes, like in flower. Its not easy task to go manually. Especially when so many edges are - flower. --PetarM (talk) 08:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- The left one seems to be in the original. The right one does appear to be a focus stack error (much sharper in your unprocessed example). Those drove me crazy when I was creating such images as File:Unidentified rose, Yogyakarta, 2014-11-12.jpg; it required a lot of toying with things in Helicon Focus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sharp eye you have. I did check on originals. Saw those lines (left cup) in that part also in originals. But really seems like mistake. Somekind refraction-diffraction ligth play, or even lines from white linen. Maybe the Braggs law come to enforce. Here they are, unprocessed. one and the other one --PetarM (talk) 20:17, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- Added two notes. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Crisco 1492 I can answer if you put notation on that spot, but some smudges are in real. --PetarM (talk) 18:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Also, it seems to me that there were some focus stacking errors on the wine glasses. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I think I gave this one as make-your own Christmas-Wikilove... Remember thinking this could probably be a FP as well... Hafspajen (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Jobas (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Promoted File:Serbian Christmas meal.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
