Talk:Cineon

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

This article is confusing. The tile is Cineon, though it speaks as if it is about the Cineon File Format and at the same time gives a little information about the Cineon Digital Film System. There are several parts to the Cineon Digital Film System. It might be better explained if this article was split into 5 separate articles, or some how divided into sections. The Cineon Digital Film System contained 3 products and a file format, they were all separate entities. The Cineon File Format is one entity that is still used today. So, in conclusion I would suggest splitting this article into 5 separate articles. Main Article "Cineon Digital Film System" with supporting articles. There is a lot of information on each subject that isn't detailed in the current "Cineon" article. Cineon Digital Film Scanner - Cineon Digital Film Recorder - Cineon Visual Effects Software- Cineon File Format

The only downfall with having 5 separate articles is that the Cineon Digital Film System article might be a bit small. --MyMagicdoor — Preceding MyMagicdoor comment added by MyMagicdoor (talk • contribs) 16:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No reason to slit up a small article like this. Please find a way to do it in separate sections. --Kvng (talk) 13:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the completely unsourced calibration section per WP:NOTHOWTO. – ukexpat (talk) 19:23, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since www.cineon.com has been down for more than 2 years (as of April 2020), is it ok to put an archive link on the infobox for the main url and standard ? Cgo (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]