Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Primefac

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for Bot Approvals Group membership. Please do not modify it.

BAG Nomination: Primefac

• Primefac (talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log · edit summaries)

I've been asked a few times in the last couple of months to run for BAG, and it's an area of Wikipedia I feel I can be useful, so... here I am. I have 25 successful bot tasks with User:PrimeBOT, so I'm quite familiar with the BRFA process as well as the technical/regex-ical side of running bots. My other relevant activities on-wiki involve closing TFDs, RFCs, and other discussions, the first of which lately seems to be the subject material of a lot of bot requests (i.e. updating/fixing/changing templates).

In other words, I feel like I have the experience and temperament needed to be a productive member of the team. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• With wide support and having run for the standard duration, this nomination is closed as successful. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Discussion

• Support As pesterer. Very knowledgeable, experienced, and active. SQL^{Query me!} 00:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support knowledgable and skilled Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Sounds competent enough for the job. ^Semi_Hypercube ✎ 01:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Primefac continually demonstrates excellent judgement and dedication and I think he'd be a wonderful addition. ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 01:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per above -FASTILY 01:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Good botop and very considered editor. There are examples on Primefac's talkpage right now that show how thoughtful and helpful Primefac can be as a bot operator. Will be a good addition. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, mostly per WP:DUH. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, per Headbomb and SQL's rationales. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - super helpful and super knowledgeable. Killiondude (talk) 05:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Good addition to the team. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support as customer of Primefac's bots. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support big fan of the work, will make a great addition. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:27, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Has the skills. ∯WBG^converse 07:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support of course. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, I had assumed Primefac was already part of it. Home Lander (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support excellent candidate Mz7 (talk) 22:53, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Dolotta (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.