Abstract
As emerging economies experience unprecedented market and institutional changes, where should firms focus their attention to address new marketing challenges: network-based resources (e.g., managerial ties) or market-based capabilities? Building on institutional theory, this study examines the evolving roles of managerial ties and firm capabilities, as well as their interplay, in China. A longitudinal survey of 166 Chinese firms reveals that over time, the positive role of ties with the government (i.e., political ties) declines, whereas the positive effect of ties with the business partners (i.e., business ties) persists; marketing capability has a persistent effect, and technology capability exerts a stronger impact on performance. Moreover, as market development progresses, marketing capability positively interacts with business ties, whereas technology capability positively interacts with political ties, in fostering performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The marketization index, by the National Economic Research Institute (NERI) of the China Reform Foundation (http://www.neri.org.cn/), assesses the relative level of market development in China on the basis of 24 indicators pertaining to the development of the factor market, private sector, market intermediaries, and legal system. The final score is normalized to a value between 0 and 10; larger values indicate better development (Fan and Wang 2004).
Because both managerial ties and firm capabilities are shaped by corporate strategic choices during the institutional transition (Child 1997; Peng 2003), indicators of these constructs reflect corporate behaviors determined by the proactive strategic choices, which means the direction of causality is from the latent constructs to the indicators. In the measurement configuration, removing one item from these latent constructs would not change the nature of the strategic choices. Therefore, consistent with previous studies (e.g., Peng and Luo 2000; Song et al. 2005), we treated them as reflective rather than formative scales.
Test results for 2003/2008: political vs. business ties: Δχ2 (1) = 34.39, p < .01/Δχ2 (1) = 104.90, p < .01; marketing vs. technology capability: Δχ2 (1) = 344.80, p < .01/Δχ2 (1) = 224.89, p < .01; political ties vs. marketing capability: Δχ2 (1) = 372.19, p < .01/Δχ2 (1) = 231.74, p < .01; political ties vs. technology capability: Δχ2 (1) = 326.49, p < .01/Δχ2 (1) = 228.68, p < .01; business ties vs. marketing capability: Δχ2 (1) = 88.08, p < .01/Δχ2 (1) = 118.98, p < .01; business ties vs. technology capability: Δχ2 (1) = 73.46, p < .01/Δχ2 (1) = 89.58, p < .01.
References
Adler, P. S., & Kown, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
Ambler, T., Styles, C., & Wang, X. (1999). The effect of channel relationships and guanxi on the performance of inter-province export ventures in the People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(1), 75–88.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review of recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(May), 411–423.
Armstrong, S. J., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(Aug), 396–402.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
Capaldo, A. (2007). Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strategic Management Journal, 28(June), 585–608.
Chen, Y., & Puttitanun, T. (2005). Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(2), 474–493.
Child, J. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations, and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1), 43–76.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 37–52.
Drucker, P. F. (1974). Management: Task, responsibilities, practices. Harper & Row.
Fan, G., & Wang, X. (2004). NERI index of marketization of China’s provinces. Beijing: Economics Science Press.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Market Research, 18, 39–50.
Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 77–79.
Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654–681.
Gu, F. F., Hung, K., & Tse, D. K. (2008). When does guanxi matter? Issues of capitalization and its dark sides. Journal of Marketing, 72(July), 12–28.
Gulati, R. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(August), 775–782.
Hamilton, B. H., & Nickerson, J. A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51–78.
Heide, J., & Wathne, K. H. (2006). Friends, businesspeople, and relationship roles: A conceptual framework and a research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 70(July), 90–103.
Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362–75.
Hermelo, F. D., & Vassolo, R. (2010). Institutional development and hypercompetition in emerging economies. Strategy Management Journal, 31(13), 1457–1473.
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling. Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53–70.
Johnson, J., & Tellis, G. J. (2008). Drivers of success for market entry into China and India. Journal of Marketing, 72(May), 1–13.
Katsikeas, C. S., Skarmeas, D., & Bello, D. C. (2009). Developing successful trust-based international exchange relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 132–155.
Keister, L. A. (2001). Exchange structures in transition: Lending and trade relations in Chinese business groups. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 336–360.
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–48.
Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371–1411.
Krasnikov, A., & Jayachandran, S. (2008). The relative impact of marketing, research-and-development, and operations capabilities on firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 1–11.
Li, J. J., Poppo, L., & Zhou, K. Z. (2008). Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 383–400.
Li, J. J., Zhou, K. Z., & Shao, A. T. (2009). Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: An interactive perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2), 339–352.
Luo, Y. (2003). Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1315–1327.
Malhotra, N. K. (1999) Marketing research: An applied orientation, 3/E, Pearson Higher Education.
McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (1999). Interfirm relationships and informal credit in Vietnam. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1285–1320.
Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909–920.
Moorman, C., & Slotegraaf, R. J. (1999). The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 239–257.
North, D. (1990). Institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
North, D. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mullen, M. R. (1995). Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 573–596.
Murray, J. Y., Gao, G. Y., & Kotabe, M. (2011). Market orientation and performance of export ventures: the process through marketing capabilities and competitive advantages. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 252–269.
Murrell, P. (2005). Institutions and firms in transition economies. In: Menard, C., Shirley, M. (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 667–699). Springer.
Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.
Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro–macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(June), 486–501.
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. R. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.
Prabhu, J. C., Chandy, R. K., & Ellis, M. E. (2005). The impact of acquisitions on innovation: Poison pill, placebo, or tonic? Journal of Marketing, 69(January), 114–130.
Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(April), 1–18.
Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2003). Interfirm cooperation and customer orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(November), 421–436.
Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, W. C. (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 73–85.
Shaner, J., & Maznevski, M. (2011). The relationship between networks, institutional development, and performance in foreign investments. Strategic Management Journal, 32(5), 556–568.
Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(January), 1–15.
Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(July), 166–182.
Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 259–276.
Steensma, H. K., Tihanyi, L., Lyles, M. A., & Dhanaraj, C. (2005). The evolving value of foreign partnerships in transitioning economies. Academy of Management Journal, 48(April), 213–235.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(March), 35–67.
Voss, G. B., & Voss, Z. G. (2000). Strategic orientation and firm performance in an artistic environment. Journal of Marketing, 64(January), 67–83.
Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.
Yang, Z., Su, C., & Fam, K. (2012). Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: Governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency? Journal of Marketing, 76(May), 41–55.
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102.
Zhou, K. Z., & Poppo, L. (2010). Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China: The contingent role of legal enforceability. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(5), 861–881.
Zhou, K. Z., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561.
Zhou, K. Z., Yim, B., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(April), 42–60.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers and Editor Tomas Hult for their useful comments. This study was supported by the General Research Fund from the Research Grants Council, Hong Kong SAR Government (Project no. HKU 759011B) and the Strategic Research Grant from City University of Hong Kong (Project No. 7002903).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendixes
Appendixes
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, K.Z., Li, J.J., Sheng, S. et al. The evolving role of managerial ties and firm capabilities in an emerging economy: evidence from China. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 42, 581–595 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0371-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0371-z