Abstract
Abusive supervision has been shown to have significant negative consequences for employees’ well-being, attitudes, and behavior. However, despite the devastating impact, it might well be that employees do not always react negatively toward a leader’s abusive behavior. In the present study, we show that employees’ organizational identification and abusive supervision interact for employees’ perceived cohesion with their work group and their tendency to gossip about their leader. Employees confronted with a highly abusive supervisor had a stronger perceived cohesion and engaged in less gossiping behavior when they identified more strongly with their organization. Our findings illustrate that organizational identification functions as a buffer for those confronted with an abusive supervisor.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.
References
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
Aquino, K., & Douglas, S. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 195–208.
Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2001). How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 52–59.
Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230.
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191–201.
Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
Baker, J. S., & Jones, M. A. (1996). The poison grapevine: How destructive are gossip and rumor in the workplace? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 75–86.
Bamberger, P. A., & Bacharach, S. B. (2006) Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59, 723–752.
Bass, B. M. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. New York: Harper.
Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 642–649.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2003). The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of science (2nd ed., pp. 247–281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: Getting even and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1998). Two faces of the powerless: Coping with tyranny in organizations. In R. M. Kramer & M. A. Neale (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. 203–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Biron, M. (2010). Negative reciprocity and the association between perceived organizational ethical values and organizational deviance. Human Relations, 63, 875–897.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69, 479–504.
Camps, J., Decoster, S., & Stouten, J. (2012). My share is fair, so I don’t care the moderating role of distributive justice in the perception of leaders’ self-serving behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11, 49–59.
Chin, W. W., Salisbury, W. M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Stollak, M. J. (1999). Perceived cohesion in small groups: Adapting and testing the perceived cohesion scale in a small-group setting. Small Group Research, 30, 751–766.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.
De Cremer, D. (2003). How self-conception may lead to inequality: Effect of hierarchical roles on the equality rule in organizational resource-sharing tasks. Group and Organization Management, 28, 282–302.
DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2000). How top PR professionals handle hearsay: Corporate rumors, their effects, and strategies to manage them. Public Relations Review, 26, 173–190.
DiFonzo, N., Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994). Reining in rumors. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 47–62.
Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.
Dukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507–533.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8,100–110.
Dupre, K. E., Inness, M., Connelly, C. E., Barling, J., & Hoption, C. (2006). Workplace aggression in teenage parttime employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 987–997.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
Elias, N., & Scotson, J. (1994). The established and the outsiders: A sociological inquiry into community problems (Rev. ed.). London: Sage.
Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323.
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., & Keltner, D. (2012). The Virtues of Gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1015–1030.
Frost, P. J. (2004). Handling toxic emotions: New challenges for leaders and their organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 111–127.
Gilbert, J. A., & Tang, T. L. (1998). An examination of organizational trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27, 321–338.
Grosser, T. J., Lopez-Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. (2010). A social network analysis of gossip in organizational life. Group and Organization Management, 35, 177–212.
Hall, D. T., Schneider, B., & Nygren, H. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176–190.
Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 252–263.
Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 264–280.
Henle, C. A., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 219–230.
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership—Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493–504.
Hornstein, H. A. (1996). Brutal bosses and their prey. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
Inness, M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2005). Understanding supervisor-targeted aggression: A within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 731–739.
Lewin, K. (1951). In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
Lipponen, J., Wisse, B., & Perälä, J. (2011). Perceived justice and group identification: The moderating role of previous identification. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 10, 13–23.
Lord, V. B. (1998). Characteristics of violence in state government. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 489–504.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.
Mayer, D. M., Thau, S., Workman, K. M., Van Dijke, M., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 24–40.
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159–1168.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321–1339.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.
Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Derech-Zehavi, A. (1993). The development of the tendency to gossip questionnaire: Construct and concurrent validation for a sample of Israeli college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 973–981.
Noon, M., & Delbridge, R. (1993). News from behind my hand: Gossip in organizations. Organization Studies, 14, 23–36.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. M., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Price, S. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1981). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.
Robinson, S. L., & Greenberg, J. (1998). Employees behaving badly: Dimensions, determinants, and dilemmas in the study of workplace deviance. In C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 1–30). New York: Wiley.
Rosnow, R. L. (1977). Gossip and marketplace psychology. Journal of Communication, 27, 158–163.
Samuelson, C. D., & Messick, D. M. (1995). When do people want to change the rules for allocating shared resources? In D. A. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 143–162). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Schat, A., Frone, M., & Kelloway, E. (2006). Prevalence of workplace aggression in the U.S. workforce: Findings from a national research. In E. Kelloway, J. Barling, & J. Hurrell (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence (pp. 47–89). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Shader K., Broome, M. E., West, M. E., & Nash, M. (2001). Factors influencing satisfaction and anticipated turnover for nurses in an academic medical center. Journal of Nursing Administration, 31, 210–216.
Soeters, J., & Van Iterson, A. (2002). Blame and praise gossip in organizations: Established, outsiders, and the civilizing process. In A. van Iterson, W. Mastenbroek, T. Newton & D. Smith (Eds.), The civilized organization: Norbert Elias and the future of organization studies (pp. 25–40). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stellmacher, J., Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., & Lemmer, G. (2003). Gruppenidentifikation und gruppenleistung [Group identification and group performance]. Paper presented at Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, TeaP, Kiel, Germany.
Stellmachter, J., Van Dick, R., & Wagner, U. (2002). The importance of group identification in task performances in a real-world context. Poster session presented at the 13th General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, San Sebastian, Spain.
Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 26–43.
Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). I’m doing the best I can (for myself): Leadership and variance of harvesting in resource dilemmas. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 205–211.
Stouten, J., & Tripp, T. M. (2009). Claiming more than equality: Should leaders ask for forgiveness? The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 287–298.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 56–65). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.
Tepper, B. J., Carr, J. C., Breaux, D. M., Geider, S., Hu, C. Y., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 156–167.
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural justice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101–123.
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). Moderators of the relationships between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 455–465.
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 974–983.
Thau, S., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1009–1031.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 518–538). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Carsten, M. K. (2007) Being ethical when the boss is not. Organizational Dynamics, 36, 187–201.
Van Dick, R., Ullrich, J. & Tissington, P. A. (2006). Working under a black cloud: How to sustain organizational identification after a merger. British Journal of Management, 17, 69–79.
Van Dick, R., & Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 129–149.
Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dick, R. & Tavares, S. (2007). Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 457–477.
Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.
Wang, W., Mao, J., Wu, W. & Liu, J. (2012). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: The mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50, 43–60.
Wech, B. A., Mossholder, K. W.,Steel, R. P., & Bennett, N. (1998). Does work group cohesiveness affect individuals’ performance and organizational commitment? A cross-level examination. Small Group Research, 29, 472–494.
Wu, C., Neubert, M. J., & Yi, X. (2007). Transformational leadership, cohesion perceptions, and employee cynicism about organizational change: The mediating role of justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 327–351.
Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 531–543.
Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1068–1076.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Decoster, S., Camps, J., Stouten, J. et al. Standing by Your Organization: The Impact of Organizational Identification and Abusive Supervision on Followers’ Perceived Cohesion and Tendency to Gossip. J Bus Ethics 118, 623–634 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1612-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1612-z