Abstract
The term contextual cuing refers to improved visual search performance with repeated exposure to a configuration of objects. Participants use predictive cues—derived from learned associations between target locations and the spatial arrangement of the surrounding distractors in a configuration—to efficiently guide search behavior. Researchers have claimed that contextual cuing can occur implicitly. The present experiments examined two explicit measures—generation and recognition. In Experiment 1, we found that contextual cuing information was consciously retrievable when the number of trials used in a generation test was increased, and the results also suggested that the shorter tests that were used previously were not statistically powerful enough to detect a true awareness effect. In Experiment 2, concurrent implicit and explicit (generation and recognition) tests were employed. At a group level, learning did not precede awareness. Although contextual cuing was evident in participants who were selected post hoc as having no explicit awareness, and for specific configurations that did not support awareness, we argue that awareness may nevertheless be a necessary concomitant of contextual cuing. These results demonstrate that contextual cuing knowledge is accessible to awareness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Berry, C. J., Henson, R. N. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). On the relationship between repetition priming and recognition memory: Insights from a computational model. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 515–533.
Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (2000). On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 227–259.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360–365.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 224–234.
Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 844–847.
Dulany, D. E. (1961). Hypotheses and habits in verbal operant-conditioning. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 63, 251–263.
Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541–555.
Howard, J. H., Howard, D. V., Dennis, N. A., Yankovich, H., & Vaidya, C. J. (2004). Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. Neuropsychology, 18, 124–134.
Kinder, A., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Neuropsychological dissociations between priming and recognition: A single-system connectionist account. Psychological Review, 110, 728–744.
Lovibond, P. F., & Shanks, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 3–26.
Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 16075–16080.
Manns, J. R., & Squire, L. R. (2001). Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 11, 776–782.
Meier, B., & Perrig, W. J. (2000). Low reliability of perceptual priming: Consequences for the interpretation of functional dissociations between explicit and implicit memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 211–233.
Park, H., Quinlan, J., Thornton, E., & Reder, L. M. (2004). The effect of midazolam on visual search: Implications for understanding amnesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 17879–17883.
Perruchet, P., & Amorim, M. A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 785–800.
Perruchet, P., Bigand, E., & Benoit-Gonin, F. (1997). The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time tasks. Psychological Research, 60, 4–13.
Shanks, D. R., & Johnstone, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1435–1451.
Shanks, D. R., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Dissociation between priming and recognition in the expression of sequential knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 362–367.
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning-systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367–395.
Shanks, D. R., Wilkinson, L., & Channon, S. (2003). Relationship between priming and recognition in deterministic and probabilistic sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 248–261.
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.
Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Human learning. New York: Century.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smyth, A.C., Shanks, D.R. Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition 36, 403–415 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.403
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.2.403