Breaking the degeneracy between polarization efficiency and cosmological parameters in CMB experiments

Silvia Galli, W. L. Kimmy Wu, Karim Benabed, François Bouchet, Thomas M. Crawford, and Eric Hivon
Phys. Rev. D 104, 023518 – Published 16 July 2021

Abstract

Accurate cosmological parameter estimates using polarization data of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) put stringent requirements on map calibration, as highlighted in the recent results from the Planck satellite. In this paper, we point out that a model-dependent determination of polarization calibration can be achieved by the joint fit of the temperature-E-mode cross-power spectrum (TE) and E-mode auto-power spectrum (EE). This provides a valuable cross-check to band-averaged polarization efficiency measurements determined using other approaches. We demonstrate that, in ΛCDM, the combination of the TE and EE constrain polarization calibration with sub-percent uncertainty with Planck data and 2% uncertainty with sptpol data. We arrive at similar conclusions when extending ΛCDM to include the amplitude of lensing AL, the number of relativistic species Neff, or the sum of the neutrino masses mν. The uncertainties on cosmological parameters are minimally impacted when marginalizing over polarization calibration, except, as can be expected, for the uncertainty on the amplitude of the primordial scalar power spectrum ln(1010As), which increases by 20–50%. However, this information can be fully recovered by adding temperature auto-power spectrum (TT) information. For current and future ground-based experiments, SPT-3G and CMB-S4, we forecast the cosmological parameter uncertainties to be minimally degraded when marginalizing over polarization calibration parameters. In addition, CMB-S4 could constrain its polarization calibration at the level of 0.2% by combining TE and EE, and reach 0.06% by also including TT. We therefore conclude that relying on calibrating against Planck polarization maps, whose statistical uncertainty is limited to 0.5%, would be insufficient for upcoming experiments.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 12 February 2021
  • Accepted 15 June 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.023518

© 2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Silvia Galli1,*, W. L. Kimmy Wu2,3,†, Karim Benabed1, François Bouchet1, Thomas M. Crawford3,4, and Eric Hivon1

  • 1Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France
  • 2SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory & KIPAC, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA
  • 3Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 4Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

  • *gallis@iap.fr
  • wlwu@slac.stanford.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 2 — 15 July 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×