Abstract
This paper describes the statistical similarities among mediation, confounding, and suppression. Each is quantified by measuring the change in the relationship between an independent and a dependent variable after adding a third variable to the analysis. Mediation and confounding are identical statistically and can be distinguished only on conceptual grounds. Methods to determine the confidence intervals for confounding and suppression effects are proposed based on methods developed for mediated effects. Although the statistical estimation of effects and standard errors is the same, there are important conceptual differences among the three types of effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Alwin, D. F., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40, 37–47.
Aroian, L. A. (1944). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265–271.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Bobko, P., & Rieck, A. (1980). Large sample estimators for standard errors of functions of correlation coefficients. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 385–398.
Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980). Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I–The Analysis of Case-Control Studies.Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC Scientific Publications No. 32).
Cliff, N., & Earleywine, M. (1994). All predictors are ''mediators'' unless the other predictor is a ''suppressor.'' Unpublished manuscript.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational Psychological Measurement, 34, 35–46.
Davis, M. D. (1985). The logic of causal order. In J. L. Sullivan and R. G. Niemi (Eds.), Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Freedman, L. S., Graubard, B. I. & Schatzkin, A. (1992). Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Statistics in Medicine, 11, 167–178.
Goldberg, L., Elliot, D., Clarke, G. N., MacKinnon, D. P., Moe, E., Zoref, L., Green, C., Wolf, S. L., Greffrath, E., Miller, D. J., & Lapin, A. (1996). Effects of a multidimensional anabolic steroid prevention intervention: The adolescents training and learning to avoid steroids (ATLAS) program. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1555–1562.
Goodman, L. A. (1960). On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708–713.
Hamilton, D. (1987). Sometimes R2 > r 2y1 + r 2y2 . American Statistician, 41, 129–132.
Hansen, W. B. (1992). School-based substance abuse prevention: A review of the state-of-the-art in curriculum, 1980–1990.Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 7, 403–430.
Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Holland, P. W. (1988). Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models Sociological Methodology, 18, 449–484.
Horst, P. (1941). The role of predictor variables which are independent of the criterion. Social Science Research Council Bulletin, 48, 431–436.
James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307–321.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981a). Process Analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602–619.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981b). Estimating the effects of social interventions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Krantz, D. H. (1999). The null hypothesis testing controversy in psychology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 1372–1381.
Last, J. M. (1988).Adictionary of epidemiology. NewYork: Oxford Unversity Press.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Interpretation of statistical relations as a research operation. In P. F. Lazardsfeld, & M. Rosenberg (Eds.), The language of social research:Areader in the methodology of social research (pp. 115–125). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Lord, F. M., & Novick, R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L.R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199.
MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17(2), 144–158.
MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(1), 41–62.
Mayer, L. (1996 Spring). Confounding, mediation, and intermediate outcomes in prevention research. Paper presented at the 1996 Prevention Science and Methodology Meeting, Tempe, AZ.
McFatter, R. M. (1979). The use of structural equation models in interpreting regression equations including suppressor and enhancer variables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 123–135.
McGuigan, K., & Langholtz, B. (1988). A note on testing mediation paths using ordinary least squares regression. Unpublished note.
Meinert, C. L. (1986). Clinical trials: Design, conduct, and analysis.New York: Oxford University Press.
Olkin, I. & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155–164.
Robins, J. M. (1989). The control of confounding by intermediate variables. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 679–701.
Robins, J. M. & Greenland, S. (1992). Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology, 3, 143–155.
Rubin, D. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.
Selvin, S. (1991). Statistical analysis of epidemiologic data. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sharpe, N. R., & Roberts, R. A. (1997). The relationship among sums of squares, correlation coefficients, and suppression. The American Statistician, 51, 46–48.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology, (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology, (pp. 159–186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Sobel, M. E. (1990). Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 55(3), 495–515.
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993). Causality, prediction and search. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Stelzl, I. (1986). Changing a causal hypothesis without changing the fit. Some rules for generating equivalent path models.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 309–331.
Susser, M. (1973). Causal thinking in the health sciences: Concepts and strategies of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications.Psychological Bulletin, 109, 524–536.
Velicer, W. F. (1978). Suppressor variables and the semipartial correlation coefficient. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 953–958.
Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L. & Lockwood, C.M. Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect. Prev Sci 1, 173–181 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371