Abstract
The magnetic fields that dominate the structure of the Sun's atmosphere are controlled by processes in the solar interior, which cannot be directly observed. Magnetic activity is found in all stars with deep convective envelopes: young and rapidly rotating stars are very active but cyclic activity only appears in slow rotators. The Sun's 11-year activity cycle corresponds to a 22-year magnetic cycle, since the sunspot fields (which are antisymmetric about the equator) reverse at each minimum. The record of magnetic activity is aperiodic and is interrupted by episodes of reduced activity, such as the Maunder Minimum in the seventeenth century, when sunspots almost completely disappeared. The proxy record from cosmogenic isotopes shows that similar grand minima recur at intervals of around 200 yr. The Sun's large-scale field is generated by dynamo action rather than by an oscillator. Systematic magnetic cycles are apparently produced by a dynamo located in a region of weak convective overshoot at the base of the convection zone, where there are strong radial gradients in the angular velocity Ω. The crucial parameter (the dynamo number) increases with increasing Ω and kinematic (linear) theory shows that dynamo action can set in at an oscillatory (Hopf) bifurcation that is probably subcritical. Although it has been demonstrated that the whole process works in a self-consistent model, most calculations have relied on mean-field dynamo theory. This approach is physically plausible but can only be justified under conditions that do not apply in the Sun. Still, mean-field dynamos do reproduce the butterfly diagram and other key features of the solar cycle. An alternative approach is to study generic behaviour in low-order models, which exhibit two forms of modulation, associated with symmetry-breaking and with reduced activity. Comparison with observed behaviour suggests that modulation of the solar cycle is indeed chaotic, i.e. deterministically rather than stochastically driven.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baliunas, S. and Jastrow, R: 1990, ‘Evidence for long-term brightness changes of solar-type stars’, Nature 348, 520–523.
Bazilevskaya, G.A., 2000: ‘Observations of Variability in Cosmic Rays’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.
Beer, J.: 2000, ‘Long Term, Indirect Indices of Solar Variability’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.
Beer, J., Tobias, S.M., and Weiss, N.O.: 1998, ‘An active Sun throughout the Maunder Minimum’, Solar Phys. 181, 237–249.
Cattaneo, F.: 1999, ‘On the Origin of Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Photosphere’, Astrophysical Journal 515, L39–L42.
Childress, S. and Gilbert, A.D.: 1995, ‘Stretch, Twist, Fold: The Fast Dynamo’, Springer, Berlin.
Gilman, P.A.: 1983, ‘Dynamically consistent nonlinear dynamos driven by convection in a rotating spherical shell. II-Dynamos with cycles and strong feedbacks’, Astrophysical Journal Supp. Ser. 53, 243–268.
Knobloch, E., Tobias, S.M. and Weiss, N.O.: 1997, ‘Modulation and symmetry changes in stellar dynamos’, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 297, 1123–1138.
Küker, M., Arlt, R., and Rüdiger, G.: 1999, ‘The Maunder minimum as due to magnetic Lambda-quenching’, Astron. Astrophys. 343, 977–982.
Miesch, M.: 1999, ‘The Coupling of Solar convection and rotation’, preprint
Moffatt, H.K., 1978: ‘Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Parker, E.N., 1979: ‘Cosmical Magnetic Fields: their origin and their activity’, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Pipin, V.V., 1999: ‘The Gleissberg cycle by a nonlinear alpha Lambda dynamo’, Astron. Astrophys. 346, 295–302.
Roberts, P.H., 1994: ‘Fundamentals of Dynamo Theory’ in Lectures on Solar and Planetary Dynamos, M.R.E. Proctor and A.D. Gilbert (eds), Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–58.
Rosner, R.: 1999, ‘Magnetic fields of stars’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A., in press.
Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M., and Ferriz-Mas, A.: 1996, ‘Intermittent solar activity by an on-off dynamo’ Astron. Astrophys. 311, L1–L4.
Schou, J. et al: 1998, ‘Helioseismic Studies of Differential Rotation in the Solar Envelope by the Solar Oscillations Investigation Using the Michelson Doppler Imager’, Astrophysical Journal 505, 390–417.
Spruit, H.C.: 2000, ‘Theory of Solar Irradiance Variations’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.
Tayler, R.J.: 1997, ‘The Sun as a star’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Thomas, J.H. and Weiss, N.O.: 1992, The theory of sunspots, in Sunspots: Theory and observations; Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on the Theory of Sunspots, J.H. Thomas and N.O. Weiss (eds), Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 3–59.
Tobias, S.M.: 1996, ‘Grand minima in nonlinear dynamos’, Astron. Astrophys. 307, L21–L24.
Tobias, S.M.: 1997, ‘The solar cycle: parity interactions and amplitude modulation’, Astron. Astrophys. 322, 1007–1017.
Tobias, S.M. and Weiss, N.O.: 1999, ‘Resonant Interactions between solar activity and climate’, J. Climate, submitted.
Tobias, S.M. and Weiss, N.O.: 2000, ‘Resonance in a coupled solar-climate model’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume.
Tobias, S.M., Weiss, N.O., and Kirk, V.: 1995, ‘Chaotically modulated stellar dynamos’, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 273, 1150–1166.
Weiss, N.O.: 1994, ‘Solar and stellar dynamos’, in Lectures on Solar and Planetary Dynamos, M.R.E. Proctor and A.D. Gilbert (eds), Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, N., Tobias, S. Physical Causes of Solar Activity. Space Science Reviews 94, 99–112 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026790416627
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026790416627