Abstract
Digital elevation models play a crucial role in many earth sciences-related disciplines and are essential for spatial data infrastructure in a geospatial computational environment. A digital terrain model, a.k.a bare-earth model, excludes the bias due to the heights from urban and forests will enable the quantitative terrain characterization. Digital bare-earth models exemplify themselves as an essential input in numerous environmental analyses, especially in floodplain mapping. A forest and buildings removed Copernicus digital elevation model, referred to as FABDEM, is a first, global, open-access, machine learning-based, and 30 m spatial resolution data that simulates a bare-earth model. This article presents a novel approach to validate a digital bare-earth model by considering FABDEM as a case. Highly accurate elevations from the ground reflected photons from Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) were used as a reference to check the agreement of FABDEM’s tendency as a bare-earth model. Visual analytics done using the elevation profiles and error metrics confirms the FABDEM’s successful reduction of bias due to urban and forests to a certain extent from its source DEM. However, the error metric shows a positive offset of ~ 3 m while validating the FABDEM’s building removal algorithm, indicating a scope to decrease the building heights to achieve its anticipated objective of generating a bare-earth model in urban areas. In the case of the forest removal algorithm of FABDEM, it has successfully reduced the canopy heights to approximately 50% of its source. Still, the error metrics show a mean absolute error of ~ 14 m, ~ 10 m, and ~ 3 m in the test sites that fall in mountainous areas, rolling hills, and flat regions, respectively, that host different tree types and canopy structures. Our research has also investigated the possible sources of uncertainties and performance factors of FABDEM; these include the predictor variables, the number of regions of training sets, and errors that can accumulate from its original elevation source, i.e., Copernicus GLO-30 DEM.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The data supporting this study’s finding are freely available for non-commercial use at respective web portals of data providers, a.) Tiles of FABDEM are available at https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/25wfy0f9ukoge2gs7a5mqpq2j7, b.) ATL03 data products of ICESat-2 are available at https://openaltimetry.org/data/icesat2, c.) Copernicus GLO-30 DEM is availbale at FTP server cdsdata.copernicus.eu (registration required), d.) Global Forest Canopy Height, 2019 is available at https://glad.umd.edu/dataset/gedi, and e.) GM2008 geoid heights grids from https://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/wgs84/gravitymod/egm2008/egm08_gis.html.
References
AIRBUS (2020) Copernicus DEM: Copernicus digital elevation model product hand book Report AO/1–9422/18/I-LG, European Space Agency. https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/documents/20126/0/GEO1988-CopernicusDEM-SPE-002_ProductHandbook_I1.00.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2022
Al-Fares W (2013) Historical land use/land cover classification using remote sensing: a case study of the Euphrates river basin in Syria. Springer, Berlin
Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data (Vol. 964). USGS. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp964
Bhardwaj A (2021) Investigating the terrain complexity from ATL06 ICESat-2 data for terrain elevation and its use for assessment of openly accessible InSAR Based DEMs in Parts of Himalayas. Eng Proc 10(1):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-8-11327
Braun A (2021) Retrieval of digital elevation models from Sentinel-1 radar data–open applications, techniques, and limitations. Open Geosci 13(1):532–569. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0246
Brunt KM, Neumann TA, Smith BE (2019) Assessment of ICESat-2 ice sheet surface heights, based on comparisons over the interior of the Antarctic ice sheet. Geophys Res Lett 46(22):13072–13078. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084886
Chen W, Zheng Q, Xiang H, Chen X, Sakai T (2021) Forest canopy height estimation using Polarimetric Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolInSAR) technology based on full-polarized ALOS/PALSAR data. Remote Sens 13(2):174. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020174
Chen W, Yao T, Zhang G, Li F, Zheng G, Zhou Y, Xu F (2022) Towards ice-thickness inversion: an evaluation of global digital elevation models (DEMs) in the glacierized Tibetan Plateau. Cryosphere 16(1):197–218. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-197-2022
Choudhury DKL (1990) Trends in Calcutta architecture, 1690–1903. In: Chaudhuri S (ed) Calcutta: the living city. Oxford University Press, Calcutta, pp 156–178
Dandabathula G, Sitiraju SR, Jha CS (2021) Retrieval of building heights from ICESat-2 photon data and evaluation with field measurements. Environ Res Infrastruct Sustain 1(1):011003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/abf820
DeWitt JD, Warner TA, Chirico PG, Bergstresser SE (2017) Creating high-resolution bare-earth digital elevation models (DEMs) from stereo imagery in an area of densely vegetated deciduous forest using combinations of procedures designed for lidar point cloud filtering. Gisci Remote Sens 54(4):552–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2017.1295514
Duan Y, Ma L, Abuduwaili J, Liu W, Saparov G, Smanov Z (2022) Driving factor identification for the spatial distribution of soil salinity in the irrigation area of the Syr Darya river, Kazakhstan. Agronomy 12(8):1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081912
Emporis (2022) Gurgaon high rises. https://www.emporis.com/city/102893/gurgaon-india. Accessed 20 September 2022
Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander , Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: KDD-96 proceedings. AAAI pp 226–231
Faherty D, Schumann GJP, Moller DK (2020) Bare earth DEM generation for large floodplains using image classification in high-resolution single-pass InSAR. Front Earth Sci 8:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00027
Fisher PF, Tate NJ (2006) Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Prog Phys Geogr 30(4):467–489. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133306pp492ra
Gautam MK, Tripathi AK, Manhas RK (2011) Assessment of critical loads in tropical sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. F.) forests of Doon valley Himalayas, India. Water Air Soil Pollut 218(1):235–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0638-z
Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations. Bioscience 52(2):143–150. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2
Goud GPS, Bhardwaj A (2021) Estimation of building heights and DEM accuracy assessment using ICESat-2 data products. Eng Proc 10(1):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-8-11442
Government of India (2011) Census of India 2011—primary census abstract data tables (India and states/UTs–Town/village/ward level). Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/census-tables. Accessed on 20 September 2022
Grohmann CH (2018) Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30. Remote Sens Environ 212:121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043
Gupta RP (2018) Digital elevation model. In: Remote Sensing Geology. Springer, Heidelber, pp 101–106
Gurugram (2022) Gurugram. https://gurugram.gov.in/about-district/demography/. Accessed on 20 September 2022
Guth PL, Geoffroy TM (2021) LiDAR point cloud and ICESat-2 evaluation of 1 second global digital elevation models: copernicus wins. Trans GIS 25(5):2245–2261. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12825
Guth PL et al (2021) Digital elevation models: terminology and definitions. Remote Sens 13(18):3581. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183581
Hawker L, Uhe P, Paulo L, Sosa J, Savage J, Sampson C, Neal J (2022) A 30 m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed. Environ Res Lett 17(2):024016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f
Hawker L, Neal J (2021) Forest and buildings removed Copernicus DEM (FABDEM). https://doi.org/10.5523/bris.25wfy0f9ukoge2gs7a5mqpq2j7. Accessed on 20 September 2022
Herzfeld UC, McDonald BW, Wallin BF, Neumann TA, Markus T, Brenner A, Field C (2013) Algorithm for detection of ground and canopy cover in micropulse photon-counting lidar altimeter data in preparation for the ICESat-2 mission. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52(4):2109–2125. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2258350
Hirt C (2014) Digital terrain models. In: Grafarend EW (ed) Encyclopedia of Geodesy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02370-0_31-1
Höhle J, Höhle M (2009) Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64(4):398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.02.003
Huang J, Xing Y, You H, Qin L, Tian J, Ma J (2019) Particle swarm optimization-based noise filtering algorithm for photon cloud data in forest area. Remote Sens 11(8):980. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080980
Jagali RP, Kadam MRL (2016) Traffic queuing analysis on chord road, Vijayanagar, Bengaluru using PTV Vissim software. Glob Res Dev J Eng 1:14–19
Jedwab R, Loungani P, Yezer A (2021) Comparing cities in developed and developing countries: population, land area, building height and crowding. Reg Sci Urban Econ 86:103609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103609
Jucker T, Caspersen J, Chave J, Antin C, Barbier N, Bongers F, Dalponte M, van Ewijk KY, Forrester DI, Haeni M, Higgins SI (2017) Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes. Glob Change Biol 23(1):177–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13388
Khalsa SJS, Borsa A, Nandigam V, Phan M, Lin K, Crosby C, Fricker H, Baru C, Lopez L (2020) OpenAltimetry-rapid analysis and visualization of Spaceborne altimeter data. Earth Sci Inform 15:1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00520-2
Kramm T, Hoffmeister D (2021) Comprehensive vertical accuracy analysis of freely available DEMs for different landscape types of the Rur catchment, Germany. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1984588
Kumar S, Sara R, Singh J, Agrawal S, Kushwaha SP (2018) Spaceborne PolInSAR and ground-based TLS data modeling for characterization of forest structural and biophysical parameters. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 11:241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2018.07.010
Kumar KPN (2012) Gurgaon: How not to build a city. Forbes India. https://www.forbesindia.com/article/real-issue/gurgaon-how-not-to-build-a-city/33444/1. Accessed on 20 September 2022
Lao J, Wang C, Zhu X, Xi X, Nie S, Wang J, Cheng F, Zhou G (2021) Retrieving building height in urban areas using ICESat-2 photon-counting LiDAR data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 104:102596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102596
Lata K, Bharti H, Randhawa SS (2021) Temporal changes in tree species composition in Dalhosie forest division, Chamba circle, Himachal Pradesh, India. Himachal Pradesh State Centre on Climate Change, Shimla. http://www.hpccc.gov.in/documents/Status%20Report%20on%20Dalhousie%20Forest%20Division.pdf. Accessed on 20 September 2022
Li B, Xie H, Liu S, Tong X, Tang H, Wang X (2021a) A method of extracting high-accuracy elevation control points from ICESat-2 altimetry data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 87:821–830. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.21-00009R2
Li R, Li H, Hao T, Qiao G, Cui H, He Y, Hai G, Xie H, Cheng Y, Li B (2021b) Assessment of ICESat-2 ice surface elevations over the Chinese Antarctic Research Expedition (CHINARE) route, East Antarctica, based on coordinated multi-sensor observations. Cryosphere 15:3083–3099. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3083-2021
Li H, Zhao J, Yan B, Yue L, Wang L (2022) Global DEMs vary from one to another: an evaluation of newly released Copernicus, NASA and AW3D30 DEM on selected terrains of China using ICESat-2 altimetry data. Int J Digit Earth 15:1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2022.2094002
Liu Z, Zhu J, Fu H, Zhou C, Zuo T (2020) Evaluation of the vertical accuracy of open global dems over steep terrain regions using icesat data: a case study over Hunan province. China Sens 20:4865. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174865
Liu Y, Bates PD, Neal JC, Yamazaki D (2021) Bare-earth DEM generation in urban areas for flood inundation simulation using global digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 57:e2020WR028516. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028516
Marešová J, Gdulová K, Pracná P, Moravec D, Gábor L, Prošek J, Barták V, Moudrý V (2021) Applicability of data acquisition characteristics to the identification of local artefacts in global digital elevation models: Comparison of the Copernicus and TanDEM-X DEMs. Remote Sens 13:3931. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193931
Markus T, Neumann T, Martino A, Abdalati W, Brunt K, Csatho B, Farrell S, Fricker H, Gardner A, Harding D, Jasinski M (2017) The ice, cloud, and land elevation satellite-2 (ICESat-2): science requirements, concept, and implementation. Remote Sens Env 190:260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029
Martino AJ, Neumann TA, Kurtz NT, McLennan D (2019) ICESat-2 mission overview and early performance. In: Sensors, systems, and next-generation satellites XXIII, 11151. SPIE, pp 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2534938
Maune DF, Maitra JB, McKay EJ (2001) Accuracy standards. In: Maune DF (ed) Digital elevation models and applications: the DEM users manual. ASPRS, Bathesda, pp 61–82
Mesa-Mingorance JL, Ariza-López FJ (2020) Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models (DEMs): a critical review of practices of the past three decades. Remote Sens 12:2630. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162630
Meyer H, Reudenbach C, Wöllauer S, Nauss T (2019) Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications—moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction. Ecol Model 411:108815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108815
Nair PT (1990) The growth and development of old Calcutta Calcutta. In: Chaudhuri S (ed) Calcutta: the living city. Oxford University Press, Calcutta, pp 13–17
Neuenschwander AL, Magruder LA (2019) Canopy and terrain height retrievals with ICESat-2: a first look. Remote Sens 11:1721. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11141721
Neuenschwander A, Pitts K (2019) The ATL08 land and vegetation product for the ICESat-2 Mission. Remote Sens Environ 221:247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.005
Neuenschwander A, Guenther E, White JC, Duncanson L, Montesano P (2020) Validation of ICESat-2 terrain and canopy heights in boreal forests. Remote Sens Environ 251:112110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112110
Neumann TA, Martino AJ, Markus T, Bae S, Bock MR, Brenner AC, Brunt KM, Cavanaugh J, Fernandes ST, Hancock DW, Harbeck K (2019) The ice, cloud, and land elevation Satellite–2 mission: a global geolocated photon product derived from the advanced topographic laser altimeter system. Remote Sens Environ 233:111325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111325
Neumann T, Brenner A, Hancock D, Robbins J, Saba J, Harbeck K, Gibbons AJNA (2018) Ice, cloud, and land elevation satellite–2 (ICESat-2) project: Algorithm theoretical basis document (ATBD) for global geolocated photons (ATL03). NASA. https://icesat-2.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/ATL03_05June2018.pdf Accessed on 20 September 2022
Parasharami V (2011) Assessment of diversity and in vitro responses in Pinus roxburghii from Indian provenances. University of Pune, Dissertataion
Parveen T, Ilyas O (2021) The inter-linking of rivers and biodiversity conservation: a study of Panna Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Curr Sci 121:1572–1583
Phillips JD (1999) Earth surface systems. Blackwell, Oxford
Potapov P, Li X, Hernandez-Serna A, Tyukavina A, Hansen MC, Kommareddy A, Pickens A, Turubanova S, Tang H, Silva CE, Armston J (2021) Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens Environ 253:112165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165
Runacres AAJ (2020) Engaging conservation: village-forest relations around Panna Tiger reserve in central India. Dissertation, University College London
Sawaguchi I, Nishida K, Shishiuchi M, Tatsukawa S (2003) Positioning precision and sampling number of DGPS under forest canopies. J Res 8:0133–0137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s103100300017
Stefanidis S, Alexandridis V, Spalevic V, Mincato RM (2022) Wildfire effects on soil erosion dynamics: the case of 2021 megafires in Greece. J Agric for 68:49–63. https://doi.org/10.17707/AgricultForest.68.2.04
Uuemaa E, Ahi S, Montibeller B, Muru M, Kmoch A (2020) Vertical accuracy of freely available global digital elevation models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEM-X, SRTM, and NASADEM). Remote Sens 12(21):3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213482
Wechsler SP (2003) Perceptions of digital elevation model uncertainty by DEM users. J Urban Reg Inf Syst Assoc 15(2):57–64
Wessel B, Huber M, Wohlfart C, Marschalk U, Kosmann D, Roth A (2018) Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X digital elevation model with GPS data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 139:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.02.017
Xie C, Chen P, Pan D, Zhong C, Zhang Z (2021) Improved filtering of ICESat-2 lidar data for nearshore bathymetry estimation using sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sens 13:4303. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214303
Yamazaki D, Ikeshima D, Tawatari R, Yamaguchi T, O’Loughlin F, Neal JC, Sampson CC, Kanae S, Bates PD (2017) A high-accuracy map of global terrain elevations. Geophys Res Lett 44:5844–5853. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072874
Yang J, Xu C, Ni X, Zhang X (2022) Study on urban rainfall–runoff model under the background of inter-basin water transfer. Water 14:2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172660
Yu X, Hyyppä J, Karjalainen M, Nurminen K, Karila K, Vastaranta M, Kankare V, Kaartinen H, Holopainen M, Honkavaara E, Kukko A (2015) Comparison of laser and stereo optical, SAR and InSAR point clouds from air-and space-borne sources in the retrieval of forest inventory attributes. Remote Sens 7:15933–15954. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215809
Zhang Z, Liu X, Ma Y, Xu N, Zhang W, Li S (2021) Signal photon extraction method for weak beam data of ICESat-2 using information provided by strong beam data in mountainous areas. Remote Sens 13:863. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13050863
Zhao Y, Wu B, Shu S, Yang L, Wu J, Yu B (2021) Evaluation of ICESat-2 ATL03/08 surface heights in urban environments using airborne LiDAR point cloud data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 19:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3127540
Zhu X, Nie S, Wang C, Xi X (2020) The performance of ICESat-2’s strong and weak beams in estimating ground elevation and forest height. IGARSS 2020–2020:6073–6076. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS39084.2020.9323094
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the science team of FABDEM for providing access to the data. Similarly, the authors sincerely thank the science teams of Copernicus GLO-30 DEM, ICESat-2, and Global Forest Canopy Height for providing access to their respective original data sources used in this study. This work was conducted with the infrastructure provided by National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), for which the authors were indebted to the Director, NRSC, Hyderabad. We acknowledge the continued support and scientific insights given by Dr. Rakesh Paliwal, Mr. Rakesh Fararoda, Mr. Manish K Verma, and other staff members of Regional Remote Sensing Centre—West, NRSC/ISRO, Jodhpur.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dandabathula, G., Hari, R., Ghosh, K. et al. Accuracy assessment of digital bare-earth model using ICESat-2 photons: analysis of the FABDEM. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 9, 2677–2694 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01648-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01648-4