Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Stereotypes of single and married women and men in Turkish culture

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While it is natural for stereotypes of social groups to change over time and across various social contexts, there has been a lack of research investigating how marriage impacts specifically gender-based stereotypes. In Turkish culture, social status, roles, and stereotypes are highly dependent on marital status, and more so for women, who are labeled as “girls” until marriage. The present research seeks to examine how people picture men and women before and after marriage through free response. Specifically, undergraduates (N = 206) wrote down adjectives for single men, married men, single women, and married women. Adjectives were categorized using thematic analysis into stereotypes of appearance, personality traits, gender roles, and power. Single men were predominantly described with negative personality traits (e.g., womanizer, irresponsible, self-indulgent, and immature) whereas stereotypes of married men aligned more with traditional gender roles (e.g., father, breadwinner, and householder). However, participants stereotyped single and married men within similar power domains (dominant, masculine, and independent). On the other hand, single women were mainly stereotyped by their personality traits (e.g., fragile/pure) while married women were mainly described with their gender roles (e.g., self-sacrificing, mothering/nurturing) and positive personality traits (e.g., warm, mature). Additionally, participants described both single and married women as dominated, dependent, and resistant to power. Results are discussed considering sexism theory, system justification theory, and honor. Findings can be applied to understandings of how marriage may shape gender stereotypes in highly gendered, honor cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktan, T., & Bilim, G. (2016). Contents of stereotypes toward woman subgroups: An investigation in the framework of stereotype content model. Nesne, 4(8), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-04-08-01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive—Social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5(2), 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287932.

  • Balkır, A. (1989). Women’s perception of themselves. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Ankara University, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Turkey.

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolak-Boratav, H., Okman-Fişek, G., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2017). Erkekliğin Türkiye halleri [manhood in Turkey]. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 665–692. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.5.3.665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1999). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Society, 13(4), 679–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çelik, K., & Lüküslü, D. (2012). Spotlighting a silent category of young females: The life experiences of “house girls” in Turkey. Youth & Society, 44(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10391636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceylan, S. (2016). Social psychological predictors of violence against women in honor cultures. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Turkey.

  • Cohen, D., & Vandello, J. A. (2001). Honor and “faking” honorability. In R. Nesse (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 163–185). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copur, Z., & Koropeckyj-Cox, T. (2010). University students’ perception of childless couples and parents in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 1481–1506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10361577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Uskul, A. K., Gercek-Swing, B., Alozkan, C., & Ataca, B. (2013). Confrontation versus withdrawal: Cultural differences in responses to threats to honor. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212461962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. Denmark & M. Paludi (Eds.), Handbook on the psychology of women (pp. 107–139). Westpot: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94(3), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedeoğlu, S. (2000). Family and women’s labor in terms of gender in Turkey. Toplum ve Bilim, 86, 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dökmen, Z. Y. (1997). Relationship between working, gender, and gender roles with houseworks and depression. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 12(39), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dökmen, Z. Y. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Turkish form of femininity and masculinity scales of BEM gender role inventory. Kriz Dergisi, 7(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1501/0000901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dökmen, Z. (2003). Mental health, locus of control, and gender roles in three groups of women differing in employment status. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 18(51), 125–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167289154008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. M., & Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 11(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455870112001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. M., Skidmore, J. R., & Ward, C. H. (1988). Masculine gender-role stress: Predictor of anger, anxiety, and health-risk behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, B. L., & Eisler, R. M. (1992). Development of the feminine gender role stress scale: A cognitive-behavioral measure of stress, appraisal, and coping for women. Behavior Modification, 16(3), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455920163008.

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109.

  • Glick, P., Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., Akbaş, G., Metin Orta, I., & Ceylan, S. (2016). Why do women endorse honor beliefs? Ambivalent sexism and religiosity as predictors. Sex Roles, 75, 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0550-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.58.2.197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husnu, S. (2016). The role of ambivalent sexism and religiosity in predicting attitudes toward childlessness in Muslim undergraduate students. Sex Roles, 75, 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0639-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • İlkkaracan, İ. (1998). Women in cities and work life. In A. B. Hacımirzaoğlu (Ed.), Women and men in 75 years (pp. 285–302). İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1978). Dimensions of psycho-social change in women: A comparison between genders and generations. (Unpublished associate professorship thesis). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University, Turkey.

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1995). Patterns of patriarchy: Notes for an analysis of male dominance in Turkish society. In S. Tekeli (Ed.), Women in modern Turkish society (pp. 306–318). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A., & Jost, J. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kocacık, F., & Gökkaya, V. B. (2005). The problems of working women in Turkey. C.Ü. İktisadi İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkan, B., & Gündoğdu, A. E. (2011). Turkish proverbs and idioms in gender context. Turkish Studies, 6(3), 1133–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B., & Banchefsky, S. (2018). Leveraging the social role of dad to change gender stereotypes of men. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218768794.

  • Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L., & Phelan, J. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & McGhee, D. E. (2001). Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1164–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı, N., & Curun, F. (2001). Attitudes toward stereotypes about romantic relationship. Tecrübi Psikoloji Çalışmaları, 22, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., & Akbaş, G. (2013). “Honor” and “violence against women in the name of honor” in honor cultures. Turkish Psychological Articles, 16(32), 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakallı-Uğurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sancar, S. (2009). Erkeklik imkansız iktidar: Ailede, piyasada ve sokakta erkekler [manhood as impossible power: Men in the family, market, and the street]. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sancar, S. (2012). Türk modernleşmesinin cinsiyeti: Erkekler devlet, kadınlar aile kurar [gender of Turkish modernization: Men establish state, women start family]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, V. (2003). Theorizing gender in political psychology. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jewis (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 601–634). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sever, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2001). Culture of honor, culture of change: A feminist analysis of honor killings in Turkey. Violence Against Women, 7, 964–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmrich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texsas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangor, C., & Schaller, M. (1996). Stereotypes as individual and collective representations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 3–37). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunar, D. (1982). Female stereotypes in the United States and Turkey: An application of functional theory to perception in power relationships. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13(4), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002182013004004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunar, D. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family. In E. Özdalga & R. Liljestrom (Eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective (pp. 217–237). Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkoğlu, B. (2013). Fay hattında erkeklikler: Çalışma ve işsizlik ekseninde erkekliğe bakış [Manhood on the fault line: Examining manhood under the frame of working and unemployment]. Mülkiye Dergisi, 37(4), 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 14, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M., & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. (1996). Cohort and prejudice: Whites' attitudes toward blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and Asians. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.1086/297750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department (Psikoloji Bölümü), Middle East Technical University (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi), 06531, Ankara, Turkey

    Nuray Sakallı Uğurlu, Beril Türkoğlu & Abdulkadir Kuzlak

  2. Lawrence University, Appleton, WI, USA

    Anmol Gupta

Authors
  1. Nuray Sakallı Uğurlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beril Türkoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdulkadir Kuzlak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anmol Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuray Sakallı Uğurlu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakallı Uğurlu, N., Türkoğlu, B., Kuzlak, A. et al. Stereotypes of single and married women and men in Turkish culture. Curr Psychol 40, 213–225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9920-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9920-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation