Abstract
The number of spots on the surface of the Sun is one of the best tracers of solar variability we have. The sunspot number is not only known to change in phase with the 11-year solar cycles, but also to show variability on longer time scales. It is, however, not only the sunspot number that changes in connection with solar variability. The location of the spots on the solar surface is also known to change in phase with the 11-year solar cycle. This has traditionally been visualised in the so-called butterfly diagram, but this is only well constrained from the beginning of the 19th century. This is unfortunate, as knowledge about the butterfly diagram could aid our understanding of the variability and the Sun–Earth connection.
As part of a larger review of the work done on sunspots by the Danish astronomer Christian Horrebow, we here present a reanalysis of Christian Horrebow’s notebooks covering the years 1761 and 1764 – 1777. These notebooks have been analysed in at least three earlier studies by Thiele (Astron. Nachr. 50, 257, 1859), d’Arrest (published in Wolf, Astron. Mitt. Eidgenöss. Sternwarte Zür. 4, 77, 1873) and Hoyt and Schatten (Solar Phys. 160, 387, 1995). In this article, we construct a complete record of sunspot positions covering the years 1761 and 1764 – 1777. The resulting butterfly diagram shows the characteristic structure known from observations in the 19th and 20th century. We do see some indications of equatorial sunspots in the observations we have from Cycle 1. However, in Cycle 2, which has much better coverage, we do not see such indications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arlt, R.: 2008, Digitization of sunspot drawings by Staudacher in 1749 – 1796. Solar Phys. 247, 399. DOI . ADS .
Arlt, R.: 2009, The butterfly diagram in the eighteenth century. Solar Phys. 255, 143. DOI . ADS .
Arlt, R., Senthamizh Pavai, V., Schmiel, C., Spada, F.: 2016, Sunspot positions, areas, and group tilt angles for 1611 – 1631 from observations by Christoph Scheiner. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A104. DOI . ADS .
Clette, F., Lefèvre, L.: 2016, The new sunspot number: assembling all corrections. Solar Phys. 291, 2629. DOI . ADS .
Dikpati, M., Charbonneau, P.: 1999, A Babcock–Leighton flux transport dynamo with solar-like differential rotation. Astrophys. J. 518, 508. DOI . ADS .
Hathaway, D.H.: 2015, The solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 12, 4. DOI . ADS .
Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1995, A new interpretation of Christian Horrebow’s sunspot observations from 1761 to 1777. Solar Phys. 160, 387. DOI . ADS .
Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1998a, Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Solar Phys. 179, 189. DOI . ADS .
Hoyt, D.V., Schatten, K.H.: 1998b, Group sunspot numbers: a new solar activity reconstruction. Solar Phys. 181, 491. DOI . ADS .
Jørgensen, C.S., Karoff, C., Senthamizh Pavai, V., Rainer, A.: 2019, Christian Horrebow’s sunspot observations – I. Life and published writings. Solar Phys. DOI .
Karoff, C., Inceoglu, F., Knudsen, M.F., Olsen, J., Fogtmann-Schulz, A.: 2015, The lost sunspot cycle: new support from 10Be measurements. Astron. Astrophys. 575, A77. DOI . ADS .
Neuhäuser, R., Neuhäuser, D.L.: 2016, Sunspot numbers based on historic records in the 1610s: early telescopic observations by Simon Marius and others. Astron. Nachr. 337, 581. DOI . ADS .
Neuhäuser, R., Arlt, R., Richter, S.: 2018, Reconstructed sunspot positions in the Maunder minimum based on the correspondence of Gottfried Kirch. Astron. Nachr. 339, 219. DOI . ADS .
Pedersen, K.M., Schneider, A.: 2018, Dansk Biografisk Leksikon.
Senthamizh Pavai, V., Arlt, R., Dasi-Espuig, M., Krivova, N.A., Solanki, S.K.: 2015a, Sunspot areas and tilt angles for solar cycles 7 – 10. Astron. Astrophys. 584, A73. DOI . ADS .
Senthamizh Pavai, V., Arlt, R., Diercke, A., Denker, C., Vaquero, J.M.: 2016b, Sunspot group tilt angle measurements from historical observations. Adv. Space Res. 58, 1468. DOI . ADS .
Svalgaard, L., Schatten, K.H.: 2016, Reconstruction of the sunspot group number: the backbone method. Solar Phys. 291, 2653. DOI . ADS .
Thiele, T.N.: 1859, De Macularum Solis antiquioribus quibusdam obstervationibus Hafniae institutis, scripsit Th. N. Thiele, astr. stud. Astron. Nachr. 50, 257. DOI . ADS .
Usoskin, I.G., Mursula, K., Arlt, R., Kovaltsov, G.A.: 2009, A solar cycle lost in 1793 – 1800: early sunspot observations resolve the old mystery. Astrophys. J. Lett. 700, L154. DOI . ADS .
Wolf, R.: 1873, Astronomische Mittheilungen XXIII. Astron. Mitt. Eidgenöss. Sternwarte Zür. 4, 77. ADS .
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the referee for thoughtful comments, which significantly improved the paper. The project has been supported by the Villum Foundation. Funding for the Stellar Astrophysics Centre is provided by the Danish National Research Foundation (grant agreement no. DNRF106). We are very thankful to librarian Susanne Elisabeth Nørskov, who has been very helpful throughout the projects, digging out the notebooks and other historical texts. We are also thankful to Kristian Hvidtfelt Nielsen for help with interpreting the historical texts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below are the links to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karoff, C., Jørgensen, C.S., Senthamizh Pavai, V. et al. Christian Horrebow’s Sunspot Observations – II. Construction of a Record of Sunspot Positions. Sol Phys 294, 78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1466-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1466-y