Principals’ Instructional Leadership Within a Teacher Performance Appraisal System: Enhancing Students’ Academic Success

• Andrews, R. L., Soder, R., & Jacoby, D. (1986). Principal roles, other in-school variables, and academic achievement by ethnicity and SES. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

• Arredondo, D. E., & Rucinski, T. T. (2000). Teacher perceptions of the effects of changes in teacher evaluation policy. Paper presented at the meeting of the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April.

• Bamburg, J. D., & Andrews, R. L. (1991). School goals, principals, and achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 175–191.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bigham, G., & Reavis, C. (2001). Preferred leadership frames of principals in implementing a state-wide teacher appraisal system. Contemporary Education, 72(2), 52–57.

  Google Scholar 

• Boyd, V. (1992). School context: Bridge or barrier for change?. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

  Google Scholar 

• Brewer, D. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12, 281–292.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cardno, C. (1995). Diversity, dilemmas and defensiveness: Leadership challenges in staff appraisal contexts. School Organization, 15(2), 117–131.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cavazos, J. M. (1999). The instructional leadership of high school principals in successful Hispanic majority high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.

• Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Principal’s leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multilevels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 299–317.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cruz, P. (1995). The leadership actions of principals in schools that have experienced academic success with Hispanic students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas at Austin.

• Danielson, C., & Mcgreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum development.

  Google Scholar 

• Davis, D. R., Ellett, C. D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 287–301.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Emley, K., & Ebmeier, H. (1997). The effect of employment interview format on principals’ evaluation of teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 39–56.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Felton, G. (1986). The role of the principal in effective schools (Report No. 3114-8-10). Washington, D. C.: National Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 274 083).

• Glickman, C. D. (1987). Instructional improvement and the K-8 principal. NAESP Streamlined Seminar 5(4).

• Glickman, C. D. (2002). Leadership for learning: How to help teachers succeed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

  Google Scholar 

• Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (1998). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldring, E., & Pasternak, R. (1994). Principals’ coordinating strategies and school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 239–253.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gordon, S. P. (2004). Professional development for school improvement: Empowering learning communities. New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.

• Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 527–549.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hardy, L. D. (1997). Teacher evaluations: Perspectives of teachers and administrators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University.

• Harris, B. M. (1986). Developmental teacher evaluation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Harris, B. M. (1998). Paradigms and parameters of supervision in education. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 1–34). New York: Simon & Schuster.

  Google Scholar 

• Heck, R., Larsen, T., & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Principal leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94–125.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heneman, H., III & Milanowski, A. T. (2003). Continuing assessment of teachers reaction to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(2), 173–195.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hord, S. M. (1992). Facilitative leadership: The imperative for change. Austin: Texas Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

  Google Scholar 

• Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (2003). Instructional leadership: A learning-centered guide. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  Google Scholar 

• Iwanicki, E. F. (1998). Evaluation in supervision. In G. R. Firth & E. F. Pajak (Eds.), Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 138–175). New York: Simon & Schuster.

  Google Scholar 

• Loucks, S. B. (2000). High school principals’ perception of the usefulness of teacher evaluation for school improvement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Pacific.

• Marshall, K. (2005). It’s time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 727–735.

  Google Scholar 

• Medley, D. M., & Coker, H. (1987). How valid are principals’ judgments of teacher effectiveness? Phi Delta Kappan, 69(2), 138–140.

  Google Scholar 

• Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman, H., III (2001). Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 193–212.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murphy, J. (1988). Methodological, measurement, and conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(2), 117–139.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2001). US Congress, Public Law 107–110, Cong. Rec. 1-670.

• Ovando, M. N. (2001). Teachers’ perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 213–231.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ovando, M. N., & Cavazos, M. (2004). Principals’ instructional leadership in successful Hispanic majority high schools. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 2(3), 7–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Ovando, M. N., & McCleary, L. E. (1991). The supervision of teaching within a formal appraisal system. School Organization, 11(2), 145–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Ovando, M. N., & Troxell, D. (1997). Superintendents’ multicultural competencies. Journal of School Leadership, 7, 409–431.

  Google Scholar 

• Painter, S. R. (2001). Barriers to evaluation: Beliefs of elementary and middle school principals. Planning and Changing, 32(1&2), 58–70.

  Google Scholar 

• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: SAGE.

  Google Scholar 

• Peterson, K. D. (2006). Using multiple data sources in teacher evaluation systems. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice, 2nd ed (pp. 212–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  Google Scholar 

• Peterson, K. D., Wahlquist, C., Bone, K., Thompson, J., & Chatterton, K. (2001). Using more data sources to evaluate teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 40–43.

  Google Scholar 

• Rieck, W. A. (1989). This veteran principal tells what you need to know about teacher evaluation. The American School Board Journal, 176(7), 33–34.

  Google Scholar 

• Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (2002). Supervision: A redefinition (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Sheppard, B. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 325–344.

  Google Scholar 

• Shinkfield, A. J. (1994). Principal and peer evaluation of teachers for professional development. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 251–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, W., & Ellett, C. D. (2002). A mixed methods study of small jazz combo as a metaphor for leadership density in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

• Sowell, M. S. (1993). Teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of the effectiveness of teacher evaluation in improving teaching performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, South Carolina State University.

• Stronge, J. H. (1997). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  Google Scholar 

• Stronge, J. H. (2006). Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  Google Scholar 

• Texas Education Agency (2001). Manual for the professional development and appraisal system. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.

  Google Scholar 

• Texas Education Agency (2003). Manual for the professional development and appraisal system. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.

  Google Scholar 

• Torff, B. (2005). Getting it wrong on threats to teacher quality. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(40), 302–305.

  Google Scholar 

• Tucker, P. D., & DeSander, M. K. (2006). Legal considerations in designing teacher evaluation systems. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice, 2nd ed (pp. 69–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  Google Scholar 

• US Department of Education (2004). Innovative pathways to school leadership. Washington, DC: US Department of Education: Office of Innovation and Improvement.

  Google Scholar 

• Valenzuela, A. (2005). Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails latino youth. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. California: SAGE.

  Google Scholar 

• Youngs, P., & King, M. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zepeda, S. J. (2006). Classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice, 2nd ed pp. 101–124. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

  Google Scholar 

Download references