Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recurrent glioblastoma: who receives tumor specific treatment and how often?

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recurrence of glioblastoma (rGBM) is inevitable and often short-term. Therefore, information on the prognosis and effectiveness of tumor-specific versus purely palliative approaches should be more in-depth than a mere list of available treatment options for patients in this situation. However, follow-up data on the course of the disease in unselected patient populations after completion of primary treatment are scarce. This single-center analysis investigated the rate and number of glioblastoma recurrences after initial radiotherapy in 189 consecutive GM patients, focusing on the incidence of early death and the frequency of tumor-specific treatment (TST) versus best-supportive care (BSC) as well as the outcomes for the different approaches. In 61 % of initial population first recurrence (rGBM) could be determined by histology or imaging. 47 % received TST. 58 % of the patients with rGBM and TST were diagnosed with a second recurrence. Up to five recurrences were treated. 35–45 % of patients died before undergoing imaging studies to confirm the next recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified male sex and KPS score as independent factors (p < 0.01) for the choice of TST over BSC. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of first recurrence was 267 days in the TST group versus 65 days in patients receiving BSC (p < 0.0001). Nearly half of all rGBM patients received second-line TST, but a remarkably high proportion died early. Gender and KPS played a role in the choice of TST over BSC for recurrence treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolecek TA, Propp JM, Stroup NE, Kruchko C (2012) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005–2009. Neuro Oncol 14(Suppl 5):1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T et al (2006) Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker MD, Strike TA, Sheline GE (1979) An analysis of dose-effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5:1725–1731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weller M, Tabatabai G, Kastner B et al (2015) MGMT promoter methylation is a strong prognostic biomarker for benefit from dose-intensified temozolomide rechallenge in progressive glioblastoma: the DIRECTOR trial. Clin Cancer Res 21:2057–2064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Combs SE, Edler L, Rausch R et al (2013) Generation and validation of a prognostic score to predict outcome after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. Acta Oncol 52:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park JK, Hodges T, Arko L et al (2010) Scale to predict survival after surgery for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 28:3838–3843

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:943–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fokas E, Wacker U, Gross MW et al (2009) Hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation of recurrent glioblastomas: a beneficial treatment option after high-dose radiotherapy? Strahlenther Onkol 185:235–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levin VA, Mendelssohn ND, Chan J et al (2015) Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 122:145–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fietkau R, Putz F, Lahmer G et al (2013) Can MGMT promoter methylation status be used as a prognostic and predictive marker for glioblastoma multiforme at the present time? A word of caution. Strahlenther Onkol 189:993–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gorlia T, Stupp R, Brandes AA et al (2012) New prognostic factors and calculators for outcome prediction in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a pooled analysis of EORTC Brain Tumour Group phase I and II clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 48:1176–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balducci M, Diletto B, Chiesa S et al (2014) Low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma: final report of a pilot study. Strahlenther Onkol 190:370–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brodbelt A, Greenberg D, Winters T, Williams M, Vernon S, Collins VP, National Cancer Information Network Brain Tumour G (2015) Glioblastoma in England: 2007–2011. Eur J Cancer 51:533–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ho VK, Reijneveld JC, Enting RH, Bienfait HP, Robe P, Baumert BG, Visser O, Dutch Society for N-O (2014) Changing incidence and improved survival of gliomas. Eur J Cancer 50:2309–2318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barone DG, Lawrie TA, Hart MG (2014) Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28:1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HR, Kim KH, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Nam DH, Lim DH, Lee JI (2015) Outcome of salvage treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 22:468–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krex D, Klink B, Hartmann C et al (2007) Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain 130:2596–2606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Su D, Stimpson JP, Wilson FA (2015) Racial disparities in mortality among middle-aged and older men: does marriage matter? Am J Mens Health 9:289–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ening G, Huynh MT, Schmieder K, Brenke C (2015) Repeat-surgery at glioblastoma recurrence, when and why to operate? Clin Neurol Neurosurg 136:89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hasan S, Chen E, Lanciano R et al (2015) Salvage fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and immunotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a single institution experience. Front Oncol 15:106

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bakitas MA, Tosteson TD, Li Z et al (2015) Early versus delayed initiation of concurrent palliative oncology care: patient outcomes in the ENABLE III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 33:1438–1445

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tieu MT, Lovblom LE, McNamara MG et al (2015) Impact of glycemia on survival of glioblastoma patients treated with radiation and temozolomide. J Neurooncol 124:119–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Silvani A, Gaviani P, Lamperti E et al (2011) Metabolic, electrolytes disorders and tromboembolic risk in malignant glioma patients. Neurol Sci 32(Suppl 2):229–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mayer A, Vaupel P, Struss HG et al (2014) Strong adverse prognostic impact of hyperglycemic episodes during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme. Strahlenther Onkol 190:933–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pan E, Tsai JS, Mitchell SB (2009) Retrospective study of venous thromboembolic and intracerebral hemorrhagic events in glioblastoma patients. Anticancer Res 29:4309–4313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goerig NL, Gaipel U, Frey B et al (2015) Cytomegalovirus-Encephalitis als Ursache neurologischer Verschlechterung während der Radiotherapie und/oder Chemotherapie des Cerebrums. Strahlenther Onkol 191(Suppl 1):39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work was performed in fulfillment of the doctoral requirements of Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg for Rieke Steffens obtaining the degree title: “Dr. med”.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabine Semrau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Rieke Steffens and Sabine Semrau share joint first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steffens, R., Semrau, S., Lahmer, G. et al. Recurrent glioblastoma: who receives tumor specific treatment and how often?. J Neurooncol 128, 85–92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2079-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2079-z

Keywords

Navigation