Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling of riverine litter with citizen scientists — findings and recommendations

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantity and composition of litter at riversides and in the surface waters, as well as the occurrence of illegal dumping sites, were studied along four rivers in Chile. Data generated by volunteers were compared to the results from a professional survey, using an identical protocol. Litter was found in considerable quantities at the riversides and in the surface waters at all the sites investigated. A generalized linear mixed model analysis showed that the recorded litter densities did not differ between volunteers and professionals, even after controlling for river, site, or distance between sampling locations, demonstrating that the volunteers successfully applied the sampling protocol. Differences occurred with respect to litter composition, which is most likely due to difficulties in the classification of litter items and particles and to the underestimation of litter present in surface water samples. Even though this study was only conducted at a small number of rivers and sites, a comparatively consistent pattern of direct and intentional litter deposition at riversides was recorded, highlighting that river basins require more protection. The results also show that the citizen science approach can be a suitable means for more extensive litter surveys at riversides and in other natural environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non‐parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26, 32–46. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araújo, M. C., & Costa, M. F. (2007). An analysis of the riverine contribution to the solid wastes contamination of an isolated beach at the Brazilian Northeast. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 18, 6–12. doi:10.1108/14777830710717677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, N. (2007). The reduction of urban litter in the stormwater drains of South Africa. Urban Water Journal, 4, 151–172. doi:10.1080/15730620701464117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, J., Bagchi, P., Chen, B., Martinez, R., Dudley, S. A., & Sorger, G. J. (2000). Methodology for public monitoring of total coliforms Escherichia coli and toxicity in waterways by Canadian high school students. Journal of Environmental Management, 58, 213–230. doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balas, C. E., Williams, A. T., Simmons, S. L., & Ergin, A. (2001). A statistical riverine litter propagation model. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 1169–1176. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00133-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. K., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M. (2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1985–1998. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, S. A., & Yan, N. D. (2004). Auditing the accuracy of a volunteer-based surveillance program for an aquatic invader Bythotrephes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 91, 17–26. doi:10.1023/B:EMAS.0000009228.09204.b7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M., de los Angeles Gallardo, M., Luna-Jorquera, G., Núñez, P., Vásquez, N., & Thiel, M. (2009). Anthropogenic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): results from anational survey supported by volunteers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58, 1718–1726. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.06.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, H. S., Lamson, M. R., Nakashima, D., Toloumu, D., Hafner, J., Maximenko, N., & McDermid, K. J. (2013). Tracking the sources and sinks of local marine debris in Hawai’i. Marine Environmental Research, 84, 76–83. doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.12.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58, 192–197. doi:10.1641/B580303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176, 273–291. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.URL http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Crompton, A. (2006). Perceived distance in the city as a function of time. Environment and Behavior, 38, 173–182. doi:10.1177/0013916505276743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, A., & Brown, F. (2006). Distance estimation in a small-scale environment. Environment and Behavior, 38, 656–666. doi:10.1177/0013916505281571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Barros, T. R., Mancini, S. D., & Ferraz, J. L. (2014). Composition and quantification of the anthropogenic and natural fractions of wastes collected from the stormwater drainage system for discussions about the waste management and people behavior. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16, 415–429. doi:10.1007/s10668-013-9484-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, D. G., Sperling, C. D., Adams, C. S., & Leung, B. (2008). Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions, 10, 117–128. doi:10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 149–172. doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, A., Crowe, O., Regan, E., Begley, S., & Caffarra, A. (2014). The role of citizen science in monitoring biodiversity in Ireland. International Journal of Biometeorology, 58, 1237–1249. doi:10.1007/s00484-013-0717-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, L., Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Macaya-Caquilpán, V., Nuñez, P., & Thiel, M. (2014). The potential for young citizen scientist projects: a case study of Chilean schoolchildren collecting data on marine litter. Journal of Integrated Coastal Zone Management, 14, 569–579. doi:10.5894/rgci507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Smith, J., & Evans, S. M. (2003). The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biological Conservation, 113, 199–2013. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00373-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Free, C. M., Jensen, O. P., Mason, S. A., Eriksen, M., Williamson, N. J., & Boldgiv, B. (2014). High-levels of microplastic pollution in a large, remote, mountain lake. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 85, 156–163. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galgani, F., Leauté, J. P., Moguedet, P., Souplet, A., Verin, Y., Carpentier, A., Goraguer, H., Latrouite, D., Andral, B., Cadiou, Y., Mahe, J. C., Poulard, J. C., & Nerisson, P. (2000). Litter on the sea floor along European coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 516–527. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00234-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, D. J., Pondella, D. J., II, Freiwald, J., Schiff, K. C., Caselle, J. E., Shuman, C., & Weisberg, S. B. (2012). Comparing volunteer and professionally collected monitoring data from the rocky subtidal reefs of Southern California, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 3239–3257. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2185-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, M. R. (2009). Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings: entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, hitch-hiking and alien invasions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364, 2013–2025. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gura, T. (2013). Citizen science: amateur experts. Nature, 496, 259–261. doi:10.1038/nj7444-259a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Thiel, M. (2013). Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): A study supported by a citizen science project. Marine Environmental Research 87–88, 12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.02.015.

  • Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012). Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 3060–3075. doi:10.1021/es2031505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoellein, T. J., Rojas, M., Pink, A., Gasior, J., & Kelly, J. (2014). Anthropogenic litter in urban freshwater ecosystems: distribution and microbial interactions. PLoS ONE, 9, e98485. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoellein, T. J., Westhoven, M., Lyandres, O., & Cross, J. (2015). Abundance and environmental drivers of anthropogenic litter on 5 Lake Michigan beaches: a study facilitated by citizen science data collection. Journal of Great Lakes Research. doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2014.12.015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiguet, F. (2009). Method-learning caused first-time observer effect in a newly-started breeding bird survey. Bird Study, 56, 253–258. doi:10.1080/00063650902791991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolok, A. S., Schoenfuss, H. L., Propper, C. R., & Vail, T. L. (2011). Empowering citizen scientists: the strength of many in monitoring biologically active environmental contaminants. BioScience, 61, 626–630. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.8.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, C., Macaya, V., Núñez, P., Rech, S., Thiel, M. (2013). Informedel Primer MuestreoNacional de la Basura en los Ríos, Chile 2013. www.cientificosdelabasura.cl; Coquimbo, Chile.

  • Kusui, T., & Noda, M. (2003). International survey on the distribution of stranded and buried litter on beaches along the Sea of Japan. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 47, 175–179. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00478-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, A., & Ramler, D. (2015). The discharge of certain amounts of industrial microplastic from a production plant into the River Danube is permitted by the Austrian legislation. Environmental Pollution, 200, 159–160. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, A., Keckeis, H., Lumesberger-Loisl, F., Zens, B., Krusch, R., Tritthart, M., Glas, M., & Schludermann, E. (2014). The Danube so colourful: a potpourri of plastic litteroutnumbers fish larvae in Europe’s second largest river. Environmental Pollution, 188, 177–181. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.02.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W., & Lee, C. C. (2015). Developmental toxicity of cigarette butts – An underdeveloped issue. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 113, 362–368. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.12.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima, A. R. A., Costa, M. F., & Barletta, M. (2014). Distribution patterns of microplastics within the plankton of a tropical estuary. Environmental Research, 132, 146–155. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, M.J. (2004). Appendix 1: Making sense out of Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): its use and interpretation in model selection and inference from ecological data. Mouvementset Reproduction des Amphibiens en TourbièresPerturbées, Ph.D. thesis, 174-190.

  • Mellors, J. E., Mackenzie, L. J., & Coles, R. G. (2008). Seagrass-watch engaging Torres Strait Islanders in marine habitat monitoring. Continental Shelf Research, 28, 2339–2349. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2008.03.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. J. (2008). Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environmental Research, 108, 131–139. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. J., Lattin, G. L., & Zellers, A. F. (2011). Quantity and type of plastic debris flowing from two urban rivers to coastal waters and beaches of Southern California. Journalof Integrated Coastal Zone Management, 11, 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morritt, D., Stefanoudis, P. V., Pearce, D., Crimmen, O. A., & Clark, P. F. (2014). Plastic in the Thames: a river runs through it. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 78, 196–200. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.035.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nerbonne, J. F., Ward, B., Ollila, A., Williams, M., & Vondracek, B. (2008). Effect of sampling protocol and volunteer bias when sampling for macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 27, 640–646. doi:10.1899/07-101.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neto, J. A. B., & da Fonseca, E. M. (2011). Seasonal, spatial and compositional variation of beach debris along of the eastern margin of Guanabara Bay (Rio de Janeiro) in the period of 1999–2008. Journal of Integrated Coastal Zone Management, 11, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, A., Aoki, K., & Hamamoto, W. (1986). Distance and direction judgment in a large-scale natural environment: effects of a slope and winding trail. Environment and Behavior, 18, 755–772. doi:10.1177/0013916586186004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, D.A., Pearse, J.S., Roe, C.A. (2005). Monitoring rocky intertidal shorelines: a role for the public in resource management. In California and the World Ocean ′02, Conference Proceedings American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 624–636. doi: 10.1061/40761(175)57

  • Rech, S., Macaya-Caquilpán, V., Pantoja, J. F., Rivadeneira, M. M., JofreMadariaga, D., & Thiel, M. (2014). Rivers as a source of marine litter–A study from the SE Pacific. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 82, 66–75. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rochman, C. M., Browne, M. A., Halpern, B. S., Hentschel, B. T., Hoh, E., Karapanagioti, H. K., Rios-Mendoza, L. M., Takada, H., Teh, S., & Thompson, R. C. (2013). Policy: classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nature, 494, 169–171. doi:10.1038/494169a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosevelt, C., los Huertos, M., Garza, C., & Nevins, H. M. (2013). Marine debris in central California: quantifying type and abundance of beach litter in Monterey Bay, CA. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 71, 299–396. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.01.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P. G., Moore, C. J., van Franeker, J. A., & Moloney, C. L. (2009). Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1999–2012. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, A., & Conrad, C. (2006). Community based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: challenges and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 113, 395–409. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-9091-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. P., & McBeath, M. K. (2010). Gender differences in distance estimates when exposed to multiple routes. Environment and Behavior, 42, 469–478. doi:10.1177/0013916509341790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. C., Moore, C. J., vom Saal, F. S., & Swan, S. H. (2009). Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364, 2153–2166. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Viehman, S., Vander Pluym, J. L., & Schellinger, J. (2011). Characterization of marine debris in North Carolina salt marshes. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 2771–2779. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.010.

  • Williams, A. T., & Simmons, S. L. (1996). The degradation of plastic litter in rivers: implications for beaches. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2, 63–72. doi:10.1007/BF02743038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. T., & Simmons, S. L. (1997). Movement patterns of riverine litter. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 98, 119–139. doi:10.1007/BF02128653.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. T., & Simmons, S. L. (1999). Sources of riverine litter: the river Taff, South Wales, UK. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 112, 197–216. doi:10.1023/A:1005000724803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Constructive suggestions from the anonymous reviewers helped to improve the manuscript. Sampling by the citizen scientists was supported by EXPLORA-CONICYT. We are especially grateful to the teachers and schoolchildren for their enthusiastic participation in the surveys. Annie Mejaes kindly revised the English of the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Thiel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. S1

(PDF 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rech, S., Macaya-Caquilpán, V., Pantoja, J.F. et al. Sampling of riverine litter with citizen scientists — findings and recommendations. Environ Monit Assess 187, 335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4473-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4473-y

Keywords

Navigation