Abstract
This study examined the use of pornography in couple relationships to enhance the sex-life. The study contained a representative sample of 398 heterosexual couples aged 22–67 years. Data collection was carried out by self-administered postal questionnaires. The majority (77%) of the couples did not report any kind of pornography use to enhance the sex-life. In 15% of the couples, both had used pornography; in 3% of the couples, only the female partner had used pornography; and, in 5% of the couples, only the male partner had used pornography for this purpose. Based on the results of a discriminant function analysis, it is suggested that couples where one or both used pornography had a more permissive erotic climate compared to the couples who did not use pornography. In couples where only one partner used pornography, we found more problems related to arousal (male) and negative (female) self-perception. These findings could be of importance for clinicians who work with couples.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Byrne, D., Cherry, F., Lamberth, J., & Mitchell, H. E. (1973). Husband–wife similarity in response to erotic stimuli. Journal of Personality, 41, 385–394.
Daneback, K. (2006). Love and sexuality on the internet. Doctoral dissertation, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden. ISBN 91-86796-58-5.
Davis, C. M., & McCormick, N. B. (1997). What sexual scientists know about...pornography. from http://www.sexscience.org/publications/index.php?category_id=440&subcategory_id=336. Retrieved February 15, 2007.
Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (2005). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Geurts, S. A. E., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Dikkers, J. S. E., Van Hoff, M. L. M., & Kinnunen, U. M. (2005). Work-home interaction from a psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work and Stress, 19, 319–339.
Haaga, D. A., Dyck, M. J., & Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 215–236.
Haavio-Mannila, E., & Kontula, O. (2003). Sexual trends in the Baltic Sea area. Helsinki: Publication of the Population Research Institute.
Hald, G. M. (2007). Pornography consumption: A study of prevalence rates, consumption patterns, and effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Klecka, W. R. (1980). Discriminant analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Lewin, B. (Ed.). (2000). Sex in Sweden: On the Swedish sexual life. Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
Löfgren-Mårtenson, L., & Månsson, S.-A. (2006). “Sex överallt, typ?!” Om unga och pornografi [Sex everywhere: On youth and pornography]. Stockholm: Gothia.
Månsson, S.-A. (2000). Commercial sexuality. In B. Lewin (Ed.), Sex in Sweden: On the Swedish sexual life (pp. 233–259). Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.
Månsson, S.-A., Daneback, K., Tikkanen, R., & Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2003). Kärlek och sex på internet [Love and sex on the internet]. Göteborg: Göteborg University and Malmö University (Rep. No. 2003:1).
McNair, B. (1996). Pornography today. In I. Name (Ed.), Mediated sex: Pornography and postmodern culture (pp. 108–136). London and New York: Arnold.
MMI. (1985–2006). Norsk monitor 1985–2006 [Studies on behaviour and attitudes in the Norwegian population, performed every election year since 1985]. Oslo: Market and Media Institute.
MMI. (1997). Undersøkelse om seksualvaner Mai 1997 [A study on sexual behaviour May 1997]. Oslo: Market and Media Institute.
Mosher, D. L. (1972). Misgivings about sex. Sexual Behavior, 2(8), 50–56.
Öberg, K. (2005). On conditions of Swedish women’s sexual well-being: An epidemiological approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Uppsala, Uppsala.
Østlyngen, A., Storjord, T., Stellander, B., & Martinussen, M. (2003). En undersøkelse av total arbeidsbelastning og tilfredshet for psykologer i Norge [A survey of total workload and satisfaction among Norwegian psychologists]. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 40, 570–581.
Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: Gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7, 249–278.
Schneider, J. P. (2002). The new “elephant in the living room”: Effects of compulsive cybersex behaviors on the spouse. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 169–186). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Statistics Norway. (2004). Size of gross income by sex. from http://statbank.ssb.no//statistikkbanken/default_fr.asp?PLanguage=1. Retrieved February 15, 2007.
Træen, B., Martinussen, M., Öberg, K., & Kavli, H. (2007). Reduced sexual desire in a random sample of Norwegian couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 303–322.
Træen, B., Sørheim-Nilsen, T., & Stigum, H. (2006). Use of pornography in traditional media and on the internet in Norway. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 245–254.
Træen, B., Spitznogle, K., & Beverfjord, A. (2004). Attitudes and use of pornography in the Norwegian population 2002. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 193–200.
Træen, B., Stigum, H., & Magnus, P. (2003). Rapport fra seksualvaneundersøkelsene i 1987, 1992, 1997 og 2002 [A brief report from the sexual behavior surveys in 1987, 1992, 1997 and 2002]. Oslo: National Institute of Public Health.
Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as a mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 639–656.
Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 569–579.
Acknowledgements
The newspaper Dagbladet financed this research. The authors would like to thank Dagbladet’s Alexandra Bevefjord for making this study possible. We thank Håkon Kavli at Synovate MMI for making his contribution to describe the study design.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daneback, K., Træen, B. & Månsson, SA. Use of Pornography in a Random Sample of Norwegian Heterosexual Couples. Arch Sex Behav 38, 746–753 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4