Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diabetes adherence—does gender matter?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

This paper aims to unobtrusively identify gender patterns in diabetics' adherence to their medication regimen.

Subjects and methods

Non-adherence is a major problem in health care as it affects both the patient’s individual health as well as public health. Seen worldwide, the problem of non-adherence is even more important due to the increasing numbers of the elderly population and of chronic diseases such as diabetes, asthma, HIV, etc. It is estimated that in Germany alone, non-adherence is responsible for costs of €10 billion per year. Finding useful health behaviour patterns could be especially important for the increasing number of patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes, where costs are high and consequences such as retino-, nephro- and neuropathy severe for 180 million diabetics worldwide. This paper analyses the records of two German pharmacies, P1 and P2, regarding gender patterns in adherence to oral antidiabetics as this analysis method has a high specificity. Out of 4,474 (P1) respectively 2,650 (P2) datasets, those were selected that showed the use of medication with oral drugs for diabetes based on ATC code level A10B. The selected medication datasets were fully analysed, also the respective adherence rate for drugs used for hypertension, ATC code level C.

Results

Average adherence rates for oral antidiabetic agents varied, with 25.4% (P1 women) and 34.6% (P1 men), and 27.8% (P2 women) and 26.1% (P2 men). In contrast, average adherence rates with drugs for the cardiovascular system were high, with 73.4% (P1 women) and 74.2% (P1 men), and 57.0% (P2 women) and 70.2% (P2 men).

Conclusion

Adherence rates for oral antidiabetic agents showed no gender patterns. This finding is supported by varying adherence rates for medication for hypertension. In both cases, the chi-square test showed no significant correlation between gender and adherence classification, and also Cramer’s V only showed a small effect of gender on adherence behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalto A, Uutela A (1997) Glycemic control, self-care behaviors, and psychosocial factors among insulin-treated diabetics: A test of an extended health belief model. Int J Behav Med 4(3):191–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ABDA-Bundesvereinigung Deutsche Apothekerverbände: Non-Compliance kostet 10 Milliarden Euro—Apotheker verbessern Therapietreue. Press release 2007-06-07 Meran/Berlin

  • ABDA-Bundesvereinigung Deutsche Apothekerverbände: Patienten bevorzugen wohnortnahe Apotheke—Rezeptbelieferung überwiegend am gleichen Tag. Press release 2008-01-21 Berlin

  • Ahmed AT, Karter AJ, Liu J (2006) Alcohol consumption is inversely associated with adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours. Diabet Med 23:795–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade SE, Kahler KH, Frech F, Chan KA (2006) Methods for evaluation of medication adherence and persistence using automated databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 15(8):565–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babitsch B (2006) Die Kategorie Geschlecht: Implikationen für den Zusammenhang zwischen sozialer Ungleichheit und Gesundheit. In: Richter M, Hurrelmann K (eds) Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit. Grundlagen, Probleme, Perspektiven, 1st edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Benecke A (2005) Geschlechtsspezifische Aspekte in der Rehabilitation bei Diabetes mellitus. Pabst, Lengerich

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C (2001) A systematic review of the assocations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 23(8):1296–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino M, Leoni O, Banfi F, Lecchini S, Frigo G (2000) An approach for the estimation of drug prescribing using the defined daily dose methodology and drug dispensation data. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56:513–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer JA (2004) A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 27(5):1218–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson MH (2006) Differences between clinical trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness. Am J Manag Care 12(15):405–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezii CM, Kawabata H, Tran M (2002) Effect of once-daily and twice-daily dosing on adherence with prescribed glipizide oral therapy for type 2 diabetes. South Med J 95(1):68–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn SM, Turtle JR (1981) The myth of the diabetic personality. Diabetes Care 4(6):640–646

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairley CK, Permana A, Read T (2005) Long-term utility of measuring adherence by self-report compared with pharmacy record in a routine clinic setting. HIV Med 6:366–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer KC (1999) Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical trials and clinical practise. Clin Ther 21(6):1074–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fincham JE (2007) Patient compliance with medications. Issues and opportunities. Pharmaceutical Products Press, Binghamton New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald JT, Anderson RM, Davis WK (1995) Gender differences in diabetes attitudes and adherence. Diabetes Educ 21:523–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlinger T (2006) Historische Entwicklung und theoretische Perspektiven der Gesundheitssoziologie. In: Wendt C, Wolf C (eds) Soziologie der Gesundheit. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 34–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénette L, Moisan J, Préville M, Boyer R (2005) Measures of adherence based self-report exhibited poor agreement with those based on pharmacy records. J Clin Epidemiol 58:924–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Häussler B (2006) Weißbuch diabetes in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahme und Zukunftsperspektiven der Versorgung einer Volkskrankheit. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A (2005) What do we mean by adherence to treatment and advice for living with diabetes? A review of literature on definitions and measurements. Diabet Med 23:720–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H, Heuer SH, Lennecke K (1999) Compliance in der Arzneitherapie: Von der Non-Compliance zu pharmazeutischer und medizinischer Kooperation. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne R (1999) Patients' beliefs about treatment: the hidden determinant of treatment outcome? J Psychosom Res 47:491–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes DA, Walley T (2003) Predicting "real world" effectiveness by integrating adherence with pharmacodynamic modeling. Clin Pharmacol Ther 74(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Icks A (2005) Diabetes mellitus. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, 24, Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin

  • Jungbauer-Gans M (2006) Soziale und kulturelle Einflüsse auf Krankheit und Gesundheit. In: Wendt C, Wolf C (eds) Soziologie der Gesundheit. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 86–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungbauer-Gans M, Gross C (2006) Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit. Grundlagen, Probleme, Perspektiven. In: Richter M, Hurrelmann K (eds) Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit. Grundlagen, Probleme, Perspektiven, 1st edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger KP, Berger BA, Felkey B (2005) Medication adherence and persistence: A comprehensive review. Adv Ther 22(4):313–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lai JCL, Cheng S (2004) Health beliefs, optimism, and health-related decisions: A study with Hong Kong Chinese. Int. J Psychol 39(3):179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange C, Ziese T (2007) Gesundheit in Deutschland. 2. edn. Robert-Koch-Institute (ed) Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Berlin

  • Maty SC, Lynch JW, Raghunathan TE, Kaplan GA (2008) Childhood socioeconomic position, gender, adult body mass index, and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus over 34 years in the Alameda County Study. Am J Public Health 98(8):1486–1494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Max Rubner-Institut, Karlsruhe (ed) (2008) Nationale Verzehrsstudie II, Ergebnisbericht, Teil 1 Die bundesweite Befragung zur Ernährung von Jugendlichen und Erwachsenen

  • Navuluri RB (2000) Gender differences in the factors related to physical activity among adults with diabetes. Nurs Health Sci 2:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renneberg B, Hammelstein P (2006) Gesundheitspsychologie. Heidelberg, Springer Medizin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Revicki DA, Frank L (1999) Pharmacoeconomic evaluation in the real world—effectiveness versus efficacy studies. Pharmacoeconomics 15(5):423–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reymond J, Lennecke K, Marty S (2003) Compliance. In: Jaehde U, Radziwill R, Mühlebach S, Schunack W (eds) Lehrbuch der Klinischen Pharmazie, 2nd edn. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart, pp 241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickles NM, Svarstad BL (2007) Relationship between multiple self-reported nonadherence measures and pharmacy records. Res Social Adm Pharm 3(4):363–377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robert-Koch-Institute (ed) (2006) Health in Germany. Federal Health Reporting, Berlin

  • Robiner WN, Yozwiak JA, Bearman DL, Strand TD, Strasburg KR (2009) Barriers to clinical research participation in a diabetes randomized clinical trial. Soc Sci Med 68(6):1069–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R (1999) Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 52(12):1143–1156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaté E (2005) Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, Doty MM, Fenley JA (November 2005) The Commonwealth Fund 2005 International Health Policy Survey of Sicker Adults in Six Countries. (Commonwealth Fund pub. no. 871) The Commonwealth Fund, New York

  • Schwabe U, Paffrath D (2008) Arzneiverordnungs-Report 2007-Aktuelle Daten, Kosten. Trends und Kommentare, Springer Medizin, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer R (2004) Psychologie des Gesundheitsverhaltens—Einführung in die Gesundheitspsychologie, 3rd edn. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah NR, Hirsch AG, Zacke C, Taylor S, Wood GC, Stewart WF (2009) Factors associated with first-fill adherence rates for diabetic medications: A cohort study. J Gen Intern Med 24(2):233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner JF, Prochazka AV (1997) The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: Methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol 50(1):105–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vedhara K, Wadsworth E, Norman P, Searle A, Mitchell J, Macrae N et al (2004) Habitual prospective memory in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: implications for medication adherence. Psychol Health Med 9(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J (2001) Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive overview. J Clin Pharm Ther 26(5):331–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrijens B, Tousset E, Rode R, Bertz R, Mayer S, Urquhart J (2005) Successful projection of the time course of drug concentration in plasma during a 1-year period from electronically compiled dosing-time data used as input to individually parameterized pharmacokinetic models. J Clin Pharmacol 45(4):461–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf C, Wendt C (2006) Perspektiven der Gesundheitssoziologie. In: Wendt C, Wolf C (eds) Soziologie der Gesundheit. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 9–33

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (ed) (September 2006) Fact Sheet Diabetes. (Fact Sheet WHO, 312). World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Human and Economic Sciences, UMIT–Health & Life Sciences University, Opernring 5/2, 1010, Vienna, Austria

    Sonja Geisel-Marbaise & Harald Stummer

Authors
  1. Sonja Geisel-Marbaise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harald Stummer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonja Geisel-Marbaise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geisel-Marbaise, S., Stummer, H. Diabetes adherence—does gender matter?. J Public Health 18, 219–226 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0305-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0305-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation