Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive value of middle cerebral artery to uterine artery pulsatility index ratio in preeclampsia

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the predictive value of middle cerebral artery (MCA) to uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) ratio in preeclamptic patients.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 64 preeclamptic and 131 normal pregnancies at or beyond 26 weeks of gestation between June 2007–August 2008 in the high-risk pregnancy unit of Dr. Zekai Tahir Burak Women Health Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara. Doppler blood flow velocimetry of the uterine and umbilical arteries and fetal MCA was measured. The ratios between the PI of MCA and the mean PI value of both uterine arteries were calculated and values below the fifth percentile were considered as brain-sparing. The ratios between the PI of MCA and PI of the umbilical artery were calculated and values lower than 1.08 were considered as brain-sparing and the results were related to perinatal outcome. Statistical analysis were performed using the SPSS Software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) version 9.0 for Windows. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (95%) was also used for statistical analysis.

Results

In 11 (42.3%) of the preeclamptic pregnancies that had abnormal MCA/uterine artery PI, 4 of them had severe preeclampsia and 7 had mild preeclampsia. In the low MCA/uterine artery PI ratio group, a statistically significantly higher rate of Cesarean section (66 vs. 88.46%), NICU admission (26.3 vs. 57.6%), preterm birth (52.6 vs. 92.3%) was found. Abnormal MCA/uterine artery PI ratio and abnormal MCA/umbilical artery PI ratio in the prediction of adverse outcome of pregnancy was compared. In the prediction of preterm birth, which was better for the MCA/uterine artery, there was a significant difference between the ratios (P = 0.005).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that MCA/uterine artery PI ratio is a good predictor of neonatal outcome in preeclamptic patients in the third trimester and could be used to identify fetuses at risk of morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cunnigham FG, Gant N, Leveno K, Gilstrap L, Hauth J, Wentrom K (2001) Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. In: Cunnigham FG, Williams JW (eds) Williams obstetrics, 21st edn. McGraw–Hill, New York (NY), pp 567–618

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldman-Whol D, Yagel S (2002) Regulation of trophoblast invasion: from normal implantation to preeclampsia. Moll Cell Endocrinol 187:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunenc O, Cicek N, Gorkemli H, Celik C, Acar A, Akyurek C (2002) The effect of methyldopa treatment on uterine, umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery blood flows in preeclamptic patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 266:141–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubiel M, Gudmundsson S, Gunnarsson G, Marsal K (1997) Middle cerebral artery velocimetry as a predictor of hypoxemia in fetuses with increased resistance to blood flow in the umbilical artery. Early Hum Dev 47:177–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Peeters LH, Sheldon RE, Jones MD, Makowski EL, Meschisa G (1979) Blood flow to fetal organs as a function of arterial oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 135:637–642

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrington K, Carpenter G, Nguyen M, Campbell S (1995) Changes observed in Doppler studies of the fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. I. Cross-sectional analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6:19–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harrington K, Thompson MO, Carpenter RG, Nguyen M, Campbell S (1999) Doppler fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or delivery of a small for gestational age baby: 2. Longitudinal analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:453–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arduini D, Rizzo G (1992) Prediction of fetal outcome in small for gestational age fetuses: comparison of Doppler measurements obtained from different fetal vessels. J Perinat Med 20:29–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozeren M, Dinc H, Ekmen U, Senekayli C, Aydemir V (1999) Umbilical and middle cerebral artery Doppler indices in patients with preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 82:11–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Makhsheed M, Jirous J, Ahmed MA, Viswanathan DL (2000) Middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery resistance index ratio in the prediction of neonatal outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebrashy A, Azmy O, Ibrahim M, Waly M, Edris A (2005) Middle cerebral/umbilical artery resistance index ratio as sensitive parameter for fetal well- being and neonatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia: case–control study. Croat Med J 46(5):821–825

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hernandez-Andrade E, Brodszki J, Lingman J, Gudmundsson S, Molin J, Marsal K (2002) Uterine artery score and perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:438–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Report of National High Blood Pressure Education ProgramWorking Group (2000) Report on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nijhuis JG, Prechtl HF, Martin CB Jr, Bots RS (1982) Are there behavioural states in human fetus? Early Hum Dev 6:177–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell S, Diaz-Recasens J, Griffin D, Cohen-Overbeek T, Pearce J, Wilson K, Teague M (1983) New Doppler technique for assessing utero-placental blood flow. Lancet 1:675–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grammelini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, Vadora E, Meradi A (1992) Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 79:416–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simanaviciute D, Gudmundsson S (2006) Fetal middle cerebral to uterine artery pulsatility index ratios in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:794–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Groom KM, North AR, Stone PR, Chan EHY, Taylor RS, Dekker GA et al (2009) Patterns of change in uterine artery Doppler studies between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 113(2 Pt 1):332–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meads CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, Ter Riet G, Duley L et al (2008) Methods of prediction and prevention of preeclampsia: systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 12(iii–iv):1–270

    Google Scholar 

  20. Espinoza J, Romero R, Nien JK, Gomez R, Kusanovic JP, Gonçalves LF et al (2007) Identification of patients at risk for early onset and/or severe preeclampsia with the use of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and placental growth factor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:326. el–e13

    Google Scholar 

  21. Severi FM, Bocchi C, Visentin A (2002) Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:225–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ott WJ, Mora G, Arias F, Sunderji S, Sheldon G (1998) Comparison of the modified biophysical profile to a ‘new’ biophysical profile incorporating the middle cerebral artery to umbilical artery velocity flow systolic/diastolic ratio. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:1346–1353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bahado-Sing RO, Kovanci E, Jeffres A, Oz U, Deren O, Copel J, Mari G (1999) The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:750–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Costa SL, Proctor L, Dodd JM, Toal M, Okun M, Johnson JA, Windrim R, Kingdom JCP (2008) Screening for placental insufficiency in high-risk pregnancies: is earlier better? Placenta 29:1034–1040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Adali E, Yildizhan R, Kolusari A, Kurdoglu M, Bugdayci G, Sahin HG, Kamaci M (2009) Increased visfatin and leptin in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vyas S, Nicolaides KH, Bower S, Campbell S (1990) Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxemia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97:797–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebru Zulfıkaroglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eser, A., Zulfıkaroglu, E., Eserdag, S. et al. Predictive value of middle cerebral artery to uterine artery pulsatility index ratio in preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 307–311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1660-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1660-5

Keywords

Navigation