Skip to main content

Development of Pressure Blade Technology in North-Central and Western Mexico

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Emergence of Pressure Blade Making

Abstract

Despite uncertainty as to its place and moment of origin, the prismatic blade is present in most regions of Mesoamerica by the Early Pre-Classic or more precisely by 1200 B.C. However, some regions, especially North-Central and Western Mexico, are noticeably different. In these areas, the prismatic blade was an imported product that was not introduced until the end of the Pre-Classic period. On the other hand, during the Proto-Classic (A.D. 0–250), percussion blades acquired increasing importance in the lithic systems alongside flake and bifacial industries. Pressure blade technology was only introduced at the end of the Epi-Classic (A.D. 750–900), for the Mexican far West, and the end of the Early Post-Classic (A.D. 900–1100), for the North of Michoacan, replacing the older tradition of obtaining percussion blades.

We present a synthesis of the available data for two regions of North-Central and Western Mexico: one set from the Jalisco Highlands and the other from Northern Michoacan and the Middle Lerma Valley. Studying the lithic systems developed by the populations living in these regions allows us to focus on the conditions under which pressure blade technology appeared and explore various hypotheses. In what way did social and political factors interact with its development? Why such a delay in the adoption of this technology, despite the abundance of high-quality obsidian sources and the early existence of particularly dynamic cultural cores?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The obsidians’ provenance has not been determined.

  2. 2.

    We mean this situation is linked to the complexity of the stratigraphic contexts.

  3. 3.

    The Teuchitlan site has given its name to a cultural phenomenon that developed in the modern States of Jalisco, Colima, and Nayarit between 300 B.C. and A.D. 900. It is mainly defined by circular public architectural complexes: a circular patio was bordered by a circular platform backed by several rectangular buildings and surrounding a central circular pyramid (these circular complexes are named Guachimonton). The other distinctive features of the Teuchitlan tradition are shaft tombs and the production of large clay and hollow anthropomorphic figures. The peak of the Teuchitlan tradition may be placed between A.D. 400 and 700 (Beekman and Weigand, 2000, 2010).

  4. 4.

    The Aztatlan tradition refers to a cultural phenomenon that developed in the Mexican West and North-West, in the modern States of Jalisco, Nayarit, Durango, and Sinaloa, between A.D. 900 and 1,350/1,400. Based on the characteristics of certain features of its material culture (its pottery above all), several authors have associated it with the Mixteca-Puebla complex (which refers to a particular ceramic style and iconography), while others have found links with the Toltecs. In general, these authors agree on attributing the Aztatlan tradition to foreigners coming from the Central Highlands (Mountjoy 2000). Their success seems to have been due to prolific and diversified craftsmanship – copper working, work in shells, pottery, obsidian debitage – and a very structured widespread trading system (see Mountjoy 1990; Kelley 2000).

  5. 5.

    To describe their material, the authors divided the blades into two large categories: “flake blades and fine blades.” The former are “more roughly formed and generally broader, with somewhat irregular edges and dorsal arrises” (in English) (Spence et al. 2002: 63). The latter are “narrower and highly regular in form, with linear dorsal arrises” (in English). No indication is given about the proximal parts.

  6. 6.

    Of the 229,421 artifacts collected from this workshop, only 52 correspond to cores or core fragments. Twenty-three of them have a prepared platform, 3 smooth, 7 faceted, and 11 ground. But these cores are not differentiated nor connected to a particular chaîne opératoire.

  7. 7.

    Of the 7,327 macroblade platforms it has been possible to examine, 3,287 were grinding and 2,595 had a multifaceted surface – the others being with a single facet or cortical. Among the complete blades or proximal fragments obtained with the pressure technique, which number 13,394, 7,562 have ground platform, 3,791 multifaceted platforms, and 1,856 single-facet platform.

  8. 8.

    The three deposits of the nearby region are Los Agustinos, Ucareo, and Zinapécuaro. Some distant deposits are also found (Cerro Zinaparo and Cerro Varal, 150 km to the West and Pachuca 200 km to the East).

  9. 9.

    Variability from one site to another is found: site JR 24, on the right bank, was massively supplied from the Los Agustinos deposit (77.5%), 20 km as the crow flies, and next from Ucareo (12.5%), on the left bank and at the same distance; the deposit of Zinapecuaro, also on the left bank but 40 km away, only represents 5%. On the other hand, for site TR6, on the left bank, 63.8% of the obsidians came from Los Agustinos, only 16 km as the crow flies, but on the other bank of the river; 13.3% came from Ucareo – the closest deposit: 15 km – and 9% from Zinapécuaro (32.5 km away). The rest comes from distant sources. The Ucareo results will be discussed below.

  10. 10.

    Sites JR 24 and TR 6 excavated as part of the Chupicuaro project (directed by V. Darras and B. Faugère).

  11. 11.

    Analyses by B. Gratuze and S. Boucetta, IRAMAT, Orleans (Institut de Recherche sur les Archéomatériaux).

  12. 12.

    Archaeological research has been carried out here by the Centre of Mexican and Central American Studies (CEMCA, Mexico) and the CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique – National Scientific Research Centre) between 1984 and 1997. This research has resulted in several doctoral theses and various publications.

  13. 13.

    The study concerned a collection of 74,994 obsidian artifacts collected from a total of five investigatory excavations in the workshops of four production centers (Darras 1999).

  14. 14.

    The last production center is on the Cerro Prieto, 3 km south of the Zinaparo massif. The obsidian found here is of inferior quality. The zones of activity extend for 8 ha and include opencast extraction sectors and workshops specialized in the manufacture of unipolar cores and bifacial preforms.

  15. 15.

    The Tarascans formed an ethnic group mainly occupying the modern State of Michoacan. At the time of the Spanish conquest, the Central Highlands of Mesoamerica were dominated by two rival powers: the Aztecs in Central Mexico and the Tarascans in the West. Just as for the Aztec empire, the Tarascan kingdom was a late creation, dating from the Late Post-Classic. It was centralized politically, administratively, and economically. The Michoacan project, carried out by the CEMCA between 1982 and 1996, was concerned, in part, with understanding the beginnings of the social and political processes that resulted in the kingdom’s consolidation. The choice of the Zacapu region was made on the basis of ethnohistorical evidence from the only sixteenth century account relating the official history of the Tarascan people and which designated Zacapu as their place of origin.

  16. 16.

    In fact, Clark (1987) suggests the abundance of raw material and access facilities to the deposits, as well as the degree of complexity of the societies’ social organization (strong hierarchization), are the conditions for development of prismatic blade technology.

  17. 17.

    The limits of this territory still have to be defined – the Northern limits in particular. They are determined by ceramic, technological, and stylistic criteria.

  18. 18.

    Ceramic characteristics of the Ticoman or Cuicuilco I to IV phases of the Basin of Mexico.

  19. 19.

    While still being of good quality, this deposit does not present the same potential as Ucareo, especially as far as the size of the blocks is concerned. Healan has shown that its systematic exploitation dated above all to the Late Post-Classic and was by the Tarascans (2005).

  20. 20.

    The variations observed from one Chupicuaro site to another also support this view: the Pre-Classic occupation levels of site TR 6 are for the moment the only ones to yield prismatic blades.

  21. 21.

    This agrees with what has been found during our research: throughout the early and during the first half of the Late Chupicuaro phase, little archaeological evidence has been found showing well-established contacts with Central Mexico, commercial or otherwise (Darras 2006; Darras and Faugère 2007).

  22. 22.

    Teotihuacan is located 25 and 50 km, respectively, from its two favorite sources – Otumba and Pachuca. Xochicalco and Tula functioned synergetically with Ucareo at a distance of 250 km and more than 150 km, respectively.

  23. 23.

    The presence of residual cores and a few preparation blades is not enough, however, to infer the passage of itinerant craftsmen. These residual cores may have been acquired deliberately to be recycled and used for other purposes.

  24. 24.

    Healan’s research confirms the Ucareo deposit came under Tarascan control during the Late Post-Classic.

  25. 25.

    Two factors could have favorite the simplification of the “chaîne opératoire”: all the stages of the reduction sequence were carried out in one place, and the blade makers had the possibility to select small angular blocks producing small prismatic blades.

References

  • Arnauld, Marie C., Patricia Carot, and Marie F. Fauvet-Berthelot 1993 Arqueología de Las Lomas en la Cuenca Lacustre de Zacapu, Michoacán, México. Cuadernos de estudios Michoacanos 5, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, Christopher 2006 The Chronological context of the central Jalisco Shaft tombs. Ancient Mesoamerica 17(2): 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, Christopher, and Luis J. Galvan Villegas 2006 The shaft tomb of the Atemajac Valley and their Relation to Settlement. Ancient Mesoamerica 17(2):259–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, Christopher, and Phil W. Weigand 2010 La secuencia cronológica de la tradición Teuchitlan. In El Eje Lerma-Santiago durante el Formativo Terminal y Clásico temprano: precisiones cronológicas y dinámicas culturales edited by Laura Solar, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, Christopher, and Phil W. Weigand 2000 La cerámica arqueológica de la tradición Teuchitlan, Jalisco. El Colegio de Michoacan/Secretaria de Cultura de Jalisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boksenbaum, Martín W. 1978 Lithic Technology in the basin of Mexico during the Early and Middle Pre-classic. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boksenbaum, Martin W., Paul Tolstoy, Garman Harbottle, Jerome Kimberlin, and Mary Neivens 1987 Obsidian Industries and Cultural Evolution in the Basin of Mexico before 500 B.C. Journal of Field Archaeology 14(1): 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brambila, Rosa, and Ana Maria Crespo 2005 Desplazamientos demográficos y creación de territorios en el Baj��o. In Reacomodos demográficos del Clásico al Posclásico en el centro de México, edited by Linda Manzanilla, pp. 155–174. UNAM/INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, Susan S. 1987 Obsidian Blade Manufacturing Debris on Terrace 37. In Ancient Chalcatzingo, edited by David Grove, pp. 321–328. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calgaro, B. 2007 Sección 9: Análisis Preliminar de la Lítica. In Informe Final de la Temporada de 2007, Proyecto Arqueológico Regional Valles de Tequila. Informe científico del INAH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carot, Patricia 2001 Le site de Loma Alta, lac de Zacapu, Michoacan, Mexique. Paris Monographs in American Archaeology 9, Archaeopress BAR International Series 920, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassiano, Gianfranco 1991 La tecnología de navajillas prismáticas. Arqueología 5: 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John 1982 Manufacture of Mesoamerican prismatic blades: An alternative technique. American Antiquity 47: 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John 1987 Politics, prismatic blades, and Mesoamerican civilization. In The organization of core technology edited by Jay K. Johnson and Carol A. Morrow, pp. 259–285. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John 1988 The lithic artifacts of La Libertad, Chiapas, Mexico. An economic perspective. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 52. Provo, UTA, Brigham Young University, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John 1989 Hacia una definición de talleres. In La obsidiana en Mesoamérica, editado por Margarita Gaxiola y John Clark, pp. 213–217, Colección Científica 176, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobean Robert H., Michael Coe, Edward A. Perry, and Dinkar P. Kharkar 1971 Obsidian Trade at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Mexico. Science 174: 666–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobean Robert H., James R. Vogt, Michael D. Glascock, and Terry L. Stocker 1991 High precision Trace Element Characterization of Major Mesoamerican Obsidian Sources and further Analyses of Artifacts from San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 2(1): 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 1993 La lítica tallada de las Lomas. In Arqueología de las Lomas en la Cuenca lacustre de Zacapu, Michoacán, México, edited by Marie Charlotte Arnauld, Patricia Carot, and Marie France Fauvet-Berthelot, pp. 168–190, Cuadernos de Estudios Michoacanos 5, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 1994 Les mines-ateliers d’obsidienne de la région de Zinaparo-Prieto, Michoacan, Mexique. Bulletin de la société préhistorique française 91(4–5): 290–301, Paris

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 1998 La obsidiana en la Relación de Michoacan y en la realidad arqueológica: del símbolo al uso o del uso de un símbolo. In Génesis, culturas y espacios en Michoacan edited by Véronique Darras, pp. 61–88, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 1999 Tecnologías prehispánicas de la obsidiana: los centros de producción de la región de Zináparo-Prieto, Michoacán. Cuadernos de Estudios Michoacanos 9, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 2005a La tecnología de la navaja prismática: una singular invención mesoamericana. In Reflexiones sobre la industria lítica, edited by Leticia González Arratia and Lorena Mirambell, pp. 111–134, Colección Científica 475, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 2005b Economía y poder: la obsidiana entre los tarascos de Zacapu, Michoacán (fase Milpillas 1200 a 1450 d.C.). In Reflexiones sobre la industria lítica, edited by Leticia González Arratia and Lorena Mirambell, pp. 243–298. Colección Científica 475, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 2006 Las relaciones entre Chupícuaro y el Centro de México durante el Preclásico reciente. Una crítica de las interpretaciones arqueológicas. Journal de la Société des Amériques 92–2: 69–110, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 2008 Estrategias para la producción de Navajas en la región de Zacapu y la Vertiente del Lerma (Michoacán, México) entre el Epiclásico y el Posclásico tardío. Ancient Mesoamerica 19: 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique 2009 Peasant Artisans: Household Prismatic Blade Production in the Zacapu Region, Michoacan (Milpillas phase 1200–1450 A.D.). Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association Vol. 19(1): 92–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique, and Brigitte Faugère 2007 Chupicuaro, entre el Occidente y el Altiplano central. Un balance de los conocimientos y las nuevas aportaciones. In Dinámicas Culturales, entre el Occidente, el Centro-norte y la Cuenca de México, del Preclásico al Epiclásic edited by Brigitte Faugère, pp. 51–84. El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora/CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darras, Véronique, Brigitte Faugère-Kalfon, Christophe Durlet, Catherine Liot, Javier Reveles, and Cybèle David 1999 Recherches récentes sur la culture Chupicuaro, Guanajuato. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 85: 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, J. Michael, Michael D. Glascock, and Hector Neff 1994 Obsidian Artifacts from Oaxaca, Mexico: Source identification and hydration dating. In Archaeometry of Pre-Columbian Sites and Artifacts edited by Peter Meyers and David A. Scott, pp 135–159. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esparza, Rodrigo, and Carlos Ponce Ordaz 2005 La obsidiana en el contexto arqueológico de Los Guachimontones, Teuchitlan, Jalisco. In El antiguo occidente de México. Nuevas perspectivas sobre el pasado prehispánico editado por Eduardo Williams, Phil C. Weigand, Lorenza Lopez Mestas y David Grove, pp. 145–170, El Colegio de Michoacan, Zamora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugère-Kalfon, Brigitte 1989 Entre Nomades et Sédentaires : archéologie du versant méridional du Lerma au Michoacan, Mexique. Tesis de doctorado de la Universidad de Paris I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugère-Kalfon, Brigitte 1996 Entre Zacapu y Lerma: Culturas en una zona fronteriza. Cuadernos de estudios Michoacanos 7, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugère, Brigitte In Press Sociedad y poder en el centro-norte de Mesoamérica (600-1200 d.C.): el caso del norte de Michoacán. In Las Sociedades Complejas del Occidente de México en el mundo mesoamericano. Homenaje a Phil Weigand, edited by Eduardo Williams, Lorenza López Mestas, and Rodrigo Esparza, El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filini, Agapi 2004 Interacción cultural entre la Cuenca de Cuitzeo y Teotihuacan. In Tradiciones arqueológicas edited by Efraín Cardenas García, pp. 307–328, Colegio de Michoacan/Gobierno de Michoacan, Zamora/Morelia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filini, Agapi, and Efrain Cardenas 2007 El Bajío, la Cuenca de México y el estado teotihuacano. Un estudio de relaciones y antagonismos. In Dinámicas culturales entre el Occidente, el centro-norte y la Cuenca de México, del Preclásico al Epiclásico edited by Brigitte Faugère, pp. 137–156, Colegio de Michoacan/CEMCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galván Villegas, Luís J. 1991 Las tumbas de tiro del valle de Atemajac, Jalisco. Colección Científica 239, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Velázquez, Jorge, and Gianfranco Cassiano 1990 La producción de navajillas prismáticas en el Postclásico tardío: El caso de la plaza de la Banca Nacionalizada. In Etnoarqueología: Primer Coloquio Bosch-Gimpera, edited by Yoko Sugiura and Mari Carmen Serra pp. 513–526. UNAM, Mexico City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, Sergio, and Julie Gazzola 2007 Análisis de las relaciones entre Teotihuacan y el Occidente de México. In Dinámicas culturales entre el Occidente, el centro-norte y la Cuenca de México, del Preclásico al Epiclásico editado por Brigitte Faugère, pp. 113–136. Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora/CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, David 1974 San Pablo, Nexpa, and the early Formative Archaeology of Morelos, Mexico. Vanderbilt University-Publications in Anthropology 12, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, David 1987 (editor) Ancient Chalcatzingo. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healan, Dan M. 1997 Prehispanic Quarrying in the Ucareo-Zinapecuaro Obsidian Source Area. Ancient Mesoamérica 8: 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healan, Dan M. 2002 Producer Versus Consumer: Prismatic Core-Blade Technology at Epiclassic/Early Postclassic Tula and Ucareo. In Pathways to Prismatic Blades. A study in Mesoamerican Obsidian Core-Blade Technology, edited by Kenneth G. Hirth and Bradford Andrews, Monograph 45, pp. 27–36, The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healan, Dan M. 2003 From the Quarry Pit to the Trash Pit: Comparative Core-Blade Technology at Tula, Hidalgo, and the Ucareo Obsidian Source Region. In Mesoamerican Lithic Technology. Experimentation and Interpretation, pp. 153–169, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healan, Dan M. 2004 Extracción prehispánica de obsidiana en el área de Ucareo-Zinapecuaro, Michoacán. In Bienes estratégicos del Antiguo Occidente de México, edited by Eduardo Williams, pp. 77–112, El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healan, Dan M. 2005 Nuevos datos acerca del desarrollo de la tecnología de núcleos prismáticos en la fuente de obsidiana, Ucareo, Michoacán. In El antiguo occidente de México. Nuevas perspectivas sobre el pasado prehispánico edited by Eduardo Williams, Phil C. Weigand, Lorenza Lopez Mestas, and David Grove, pp. 171–184. El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healan, Dan M. 2009 Ground Platform Preparation and the “Banalization” of the Prismatic Blade in Western Mesoamerica. Ancient Mesoamérica 20: 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, Cristina 2000 A History of Prehispanic Ceramics, interactions, and Frontier development in the Ucareo-Zinapecuaro Obsidian Source Area, Michoacan, México. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, Cristina 2006 La cerámica del periodo clásico en el noreste de Michoacán. In La producción alfarera en el México antiguo II edited by Beatriz L. Merino Carrion y Angel Garcia Cook, pp. 313–334, Colección científica 495, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, Kenneth G. 1995 The investigation of obsidian craft production at Xochicalco, Morelos. Ancient Mesoamerica 6: 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, Kenneth G. 2002 Provisioning constraints and the production of obsidian prismatic blades at Xochicalco, Mexico. In Pathways to Prismatic Blades: A study In Mesoamerican obsidian core-blade technology, edited by Kenneth G. Hirth and Bradford Andrews, pp. 85–94. The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, Kenneth G. 2006 Obsidian Craft Production in Ancient Central Mexico. Archaeological Research at Xochicalco. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, Kenneth G. (editor) 2003 Mesoamerican Lithic Technology. Experimentation and Interpretation. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, Kenneth G., and Bradford Andrews (editors) 2002 Pathways to Prismatic Blades: A study In Mesoamerican obsidian core-blade technology. Monograph 45. The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, Kenneth G., and Jeffrey J. Flenniken 2002 Core-blade Technology in Mesoamerican Prehistory. In Pathways to Prismatic Blades. A study in Mesoamerican Obsidian Core-Blade Technology, edited by Kenneth G. Hirth and Bradford Andrews, pp. 121–130, Monograph 45, The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Charles J. 2000 The Aztatlan Mercantile System: Mobile Traders and the Northwest-ward Expansion of Mesoamerica Civilization. In Greater Mesoamerica. Cultural Dynamics of West and Northwest of Mexico, edited by Michael Foster and Shirley Gorenstein, pp. 137–154, Utah University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Isabel 1980 Ceramic Sequence in Colima: Capacha, an early phase. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 37. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, Paul 1943 Mesoamérica. Acta Mesoamericana, vol. 1, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liot Catherine, Susana Ramirez, Javier Reveles, and Otto Schondube 2006 Transformaciones socioculturales y tecnológicas en el sitio de La Peña, Cuenca de Sayula, Jalisco. Universidad de Guadalajara/INAH, Guadalajara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liot Catherine, Susana Ramirez, Javier Reveles, and Carmen Melgarejo 2007 Producción, distribución y relaciones interregionales en la cuenca de Sayula del 500–1100 d.C. In Dinámicas Culturales, entre el Occidente, el Centro-norte y la Cuenca de México, del Preclásico al Epiclásico edited by Brigitte Faugère, pp. 165–200, El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora /CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodeho, Laure 2007  L’économie de l’obsidienne à Chupicuaro, Mexique (600 av. J.-C. – 250 apr. J.-C.). Etude typo-technologique de la collection du site TR6. Master 2 en Archéologie préhistorique et protohistorique, Université de Paris I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Mestas, Lorenza 2007 La ideología. Un punto de acercamiento para el estudio de la interacción entre le Occidente de México y Mesoamérica. In Dinámicas Culturales, entre el Occidente, el Centro-norte y la Cuenca de México, del Preclásico al Epiclásico edited by Brigitte Faugère, pp. 37–50, El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora /CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macias Gotilla, Angelina 1990 Huandacareo: Lugar de juicios, tribunal. Colección Científica 222, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish, Richard S., Antoinette Nelken Terner, and Irmgard Weitlaner- Johnson 1967 The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, vol 2. The Non Ceramics Artifacts. University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanilla, Linda 2003 El proceso de abandono de Teotihuacan y su reocupación por grupos epiclásicos. Trace 43: 70–76, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzanilla Lopez, Rubén 1984 Loma de Santa Maria I, Morelia, Michoacán. Un sitio del periodo Clásico mesoamericano. Tesis de licenciatura, ENAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelet, Dominique 1992 El Centro-Norte de Michoacán: características generales de su estudio arqueológico regional. In El proyecto Michoacán 1983-1987, edited by Dominique Michelet, pp. 12–54, Cuadernos de Estudios Michoacanos 4, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelet, Dominique 1998 Topografía y prospección sistemática de los grandes asentamientos del malpaís de Zacapu: claves para un acercamiento a las realidades sociopolíticas. In Génesis, Culturas y Espacios en Michoacán edited by Véronique Darras, pp. 47–60, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelet, Dominique, Grégory Pereira, and Gérald Migeon 2005 La llegada de los uacúsechas a la región de Zacapu, Michoacán: datos arqueológicos y discusión. In Reacomodos demográficos del Clásico al Posclásico en el centro de México, edited by Linda Manzanilla, pp. 137–154, UNAM, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migeon, Gérald 1990 Archéologie en pays tarasque. Structure de l’habitat et ethnohistoire des habitations tarasques de la région de Zacapu au Postclassique Récent. Tesis de doctorado de la Universidad de Paris I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migeon, Gérald 1998 El poblamiento del malpaís de Zacapu y de sus alrededores, del Clásico al Posclásico. In Génesis, Culturas y Espacios en Michoacán edited by Dominique Michelet, pp. 35–46, CEMCA, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migeon, Gérald, and Grégory Pereira 2007 La secuencia ocupacional y cerámica del cerro Barajas, Guanajuato, y sus relaciones con el centro, el occidente y el norte de México. In Dinámicas culturales entre el Occidente, el Centro-norte y la cuenca de México, del Preclásico al Epiclásico edited by Brigitte Faugère, pp. 201–230. El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountjoy, Joseph 1990 El desarrollo de la cultura Aztatlan visto desde su frontera suroeste. In Mesoamérica y norte de México. Siglo IX-XII Vol. 2, edited by F. Soti Miranda pp. 541–564. Museo Nacional de Antropologia, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountjoy, Joseph 2000 Prehispanic Cultural Development along the Southern Coast of West Mexico. In Greater Mesoamerica. The Archaeology of West and Northwest Mexico edited by Michael S. Foster, and Shirley Gorenstein, pp. 81–106. University of UTAH Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountjoy, Joseph 2004 La cultura indigena en la costa de Jalisco, El municipio de Puerto Vallarta. In Arqueologia del Occidente de México, edited by Beatriz Braniff Cornejo, pp. 339–370. Universidad de Colima / INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narez, Jésus 1990 Materiales arqueológicos de Tlapacoya, México. Colección científica 204, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederberger, Christine 1976 Zohapilco. Cinco milenios de ocupación humana en un sitio lacustre de la cuenca de México. Colección Científica 30, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederberger, Christine 1986 Excavación de un área de habitación doméstica en la capital “olmeca” de Tlacozotitlan. Reporte preliminar. In Arqueologia e Etnohistoria del Estado de Guerrero. Primer Coloquio de Arqueología y Etnohistoria del Estado de Guerrero edited by Roberto Cervantes-Delgado, pp. 83–103, INAH/Gobierno del estado de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederberger, Christine 1987 Paléopaysages et Archéologie pré-urbaine du bassin de Mexico. Collection Etudes Mésoaméricaines I-II, CEMCA, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveros, Arturo 2004 Hacedores de tumbas en El Opeño, Jacona, Michoacán. El Colegio de Michoacan/, Michoacán.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, William J. 1994 Prismatic Blade Technology in North America. In The Organization of North American Prehistoric Chipped Stone Tool Technologies edited by Philip J. Carr, pp. 87–98. Archaeological Series 7, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, William J. 2001 Production an Exchange of obsidian tools in late Aztec city-states. Ancient Mesoamerica 12: 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, William J. 2002 Aztec Blade Production Strategies in the Eastern Basin of Mexico. In Pathways to Prismatic Blades. A study in Mesoamerican Obsidian Core-Blade Technology edited by Kenneth G. Hirth and Bradford Andrews, pp. 37–46, Monograph 45. The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Grégory 1999 Potrero de Guadalupe. Anthropologie funéraire d’une communauté pré-tarasque du nord du Michoacan, Mexique. BAR International Series 816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira Grégory, Gérald Migeon, and Dominique Michelet 2005 Transformaciones demográficas y culturales en el centro-norte de México en vísperas del Posclásico: los sitios del Cerro Barajas (Suroeste de Guanajuato) In Reacomodos demográficos del Clásico al Posclásico en el centro de México edited by Linda Manzanilla, pp. 123–136, UNAM/INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires-Ferreira, Jane W. 1975 Formative Mesoamerican Exchange networks with special reference to the valley of Oaxaca. Memoirs of the museum of Anthropology of Michigan,Vol 3, No. 7, Prehistory and human ecology of the valley of Oaxaca, edited by Kent V. Flannery, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires-Ferreira, Jane W. 1976 Obsidian Exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by Kent V. Flannery, pp. 292–306. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard Perlstein, Helen 1993 Tariacuri’s Legacy. The Prehispanic Tarascan State. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard Perlstein, Helen 2003 Development of Tarascan Core: The Lake Patzcuaro Basin. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, edited by Kent V. Flannery, pp. 227–237. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard Perlstein, Helen, and Thomas A. Vogel 1994 Implicaciones políticas y económicas del intercambio de obsidiana des Estado tarasco. In Arqueología del Occidente de México, edited by Eduardo Williams and Roberto Novela, pp. 158–182. El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter Noé, Muriel 1956 Excavations at Chupícuaro, Guanajuato, Mexico. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 46, pp. 515–637, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relación de Michoacán 1977 [1541] Relación de las ceremonias y ritos y población y gobierno de la provincia de Michoacán. Reproducción facsimilar del Ms IV de El Escorial, reedición con un estudio preliminar de J. Corona Nuñez. Balsal Editores, Morelia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reveles, Javier 2005 La lítica de la Cuenca de Sayula. In Arqueología de la Cuenca de Sayula edited by Fransisco Valdez, Otto Schöndube, and Jean Pierre Emphoux, pp. 349–368, UDG-IRD, Guadalajara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Charles, Juan Carlos 1996 El reflejo del poder Teotihuacano en el sur de Guanajuato y Querétaro. In Tiempo y Territorio en Arqueología. El Centro-Norte de México, edited by Ana Maria Crespo and Carlos Viramontes, pp. 143–169, INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santley, Robert 1984 Obsidian Exchange, economic Stratification, and the evolution of complex society in the Basin of Mexico, In Trade and Exchange Society in Early Mesoamérica, edited by Kenneth G. Hirth, pp. 43–86. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santley, Robert S., Janet M. Kerley and, Ronald R. Kneebone 1986 Obsidian Working, Long-distance Exchange, and the Politico-Economic Organization of Early States in Central Mexico. In Economic Aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico, edited by Barry L. Isaac, pp. 101–132. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 2. JAI Press, Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Michael W. 1981 Obsidian Production and the State of Teotihuacan. American Antiquity 46: 769–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Michael W. 1987 The Scale and Structure of Obsidian Production in Teotihuacan. In Teotihuacan: Nuevos Datos, Nuevas Síntesis, Nuevos Problemas, edited by Emily McClung de Tapia and Evelyn Childs Rattray, pp. 429–450. INAH/UNAM, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Michael W., Phil C. Weigand, and Dolores Soto de Arechavaleta 2002 Production and Distribution of Obsidian Artifacts in Western Jalisco. In Pathways to Prismatic Blades: a study in Mesoamerican Core-Blade Technology edited by Kenneth G. Hirth and Bradford Andrews, pp. 61–80, Monograph 45. The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto de Arachevaleta, M. Dolores 1982 Análisis de la tecnología de producción del taller de obsidiana de Guachimonton, Teuchitlan, Jalisco, México. Tesis de licenciatura, ENAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto de Arachevaleta, M. Dolores 2005 Teuchitlan: un sitio con especialización en el trabajo. La manufactura de herramientas de obsidiana. In Reflexiones sobre la industria lítica edited by Leticia Gonzalez Arratia and Lorena Mirambell, pp. 135–180 INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez Fransisco, Otto Schondube, and Jean Pierre Emphoux 2005 Arqueología de la Cuenca de Sayula. Universidad de Guadalajara/IRD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, Phil C. 1990 The Teuchitlan tradition of western Mesoamérica. In La época clásica: Nuevos hallazgos, nuevas ideas, edited by Amalia Cardos de Méndez, pp. 25–54. INAH, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, Phil C. 1993 Evolución de una civilización prehispánica. Arqueología de Jalisco, Nayarit y Zacatecas. El Colegio de Michoacán, Zamora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, Phil C. 1996 Teuchitlan Tradition of the Occidente of Mesoamerica. Ancient Mesoamerica 7: 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, Phil C. 2000 Evolution and Decline of a Core of Civilization: The Teuchitlan tradition and the Archaeology of Jalisco. In Greater Mesoamerica. The Archaeology of West and Northwest Mexico edited by Michael S. Foster and Shirley Gorenstein, pp. 43–58. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigand, Phil C., and Michael W. Spence 1982 The obsidian Mining Complex at La Joya, Jalisco. Anthropology VI (1–2): 175–188. Stony Brook, Nueva York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter was made possible thanks to the constructive discussions with many colleagues, and I especially gratefully acknowledge Dominique Michelet, Chris Beekman, Phil Weigand, Catherine Liot, Javier Reveles, Dan Healan, and Lorenza Lopez.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Véronique Darras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Darras, V. (2012). Development of Pressure Blade Technology in North-Central and Western Mexico. In: Desrosiers, P. (eds) The Emergence of Pressure Blade Making. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2003-3_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics