Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-07
review-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-07-tsvart-lc-pauly-2024-04-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-07
Requested revision 07 (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2024-04-26
Requested 2024-04-08
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Mohamed Boucadair , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K
I-D last updated 2024-04-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Tommy Pauly (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -08 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Tsvart Early review of -03 by Tommy Pauly (diff)
Intdir Early review of -03 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tommy Pauly
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/5A1hBObxqwYt7Go-07kyz1e3JuQ
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-04-09
review-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-07-tsvart-lc-pauly-2024-04-09-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

Thanks to the authors for their work on the clear and concise draft. I don't
see any issues from a transport perspective in the latest version. I appreciate
the updates since the -05 version to clarify the type of the "udpOptions" IE
(which is now a concrete unsigned256 type, still very long!), and to add more
illustrative examples.