Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-07
review-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-07-secdir-lc-wallace-2024-06-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-06-04 | |
Requested | 2024-05-21 | |
Requested by | Jim Guichard | |
Authors | Yingzhen Qu , Acee Lindem , Stephane Litkowski , Jeff Tantsura | |
I-D last updated | 2024-06-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Paul Kyzivat
(diff)
Yangdoctors Last Call review of -05 by Jan Lindblad (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -07 by Dhruv Dhody (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Carl Wallace (diff) Yangdoctors Early review of -02 by Jan Lindblad (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Susan Hares (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/TYAHASkAcGPUjpz4LttyIIYrl6c | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 12) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-06-04 |
review-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-07-secdir-lc-wallace-2024-06-04-00
This document defines two YANG modules to define support for MPLS Maximum SID Depths (MSDs). One module contains definitions for the MSD types defined in the IANA IGP MSD-Types registry. The other augments YANG modules from several other RFCs. I am not a YANG expert and made no attempt to verify the YANG modules. The draft appears to be in good shape overall. The security considerations seem appropriate to me. A couple of editorial nits are below. In the second paragraph of the introduction, "IANA the IGP MSD-Types registry" should probably be "IANA IGP MSD-Types registry." The last paragraph of the security considerations is unnecessarily indented.