User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Pi bot)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 15:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality but need perspective/tilt correction. Left building learning out. --ArildV 08:18, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perspective corrected, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 08:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. --ArildV 10:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:21, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 571.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Hughenden Manor 2024 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 470.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:26, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
OK imo. --ArildV 08:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 162.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The white fender on the bottom right is abit annoying. Itherwise good --MB-one 21:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
White fender removed with generative AI, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looks good to me now --MB-one 13:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looks good to me now --MB-one 13:54, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Chiltern Open Air Museum 2024 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 15:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 19:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perspective redone, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:29, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1432 - El muñeco de nieve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the filename would be better.--Tournasol7 06:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1435.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cholsey and Wallingford Railway 2024 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reassign category to Wikidata item

[edit]

Hello, @Mike Peel:

Is it possible to reassign the Wikidata element (Q127959530) to Category:Codex Vigilanus?

I have created the Category:Chronicon Albeldense which has its own Wikidata (Q17533465)

Not everything contained in the Codex Vigilanus is Chronicon Albeldense. It is not advisable to confuse the whole with a part.

Thanks a lot. Jdayanz (talk) 09:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jdayanz: [1] & [2] were the edits you were looking for. ;-) It may take a while for the infoboxes to update due to caching (try making some null edits or purging the page), but hopefully that looks better? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Swindon Steam Railway Museum 2024 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]