Review: 31209 The Amazing Spider-Man

Posted by ,

LEGO Art has become suddenly more varied in 2023, expanding beyond the two-dimensional designs with which this theme started. 31209 The Amazing Spider-Man appears particularly unusual and involves some completely unique building techniques.

The combination of textures is interesting and creates an appealing image of the web-slinger, featuring beautiful colour. Moreover, the comic styling is effective, further distinguishing this model from others produced in the Art range.

Summary

31209 The Amazing Spider-Man, 2,099 pieces.
£169.99 / $199.99 / €199.99 | 8.1p/9.5c/9.5c per piece.
Buy at LEGO.com »

As the name promises, 31209 The Amazing Spider-Man looks amazing!

  • Unique and eye-catching concept
  • Stunning colours
  • Dynamic pose
  • Detailed webbing and background
  • Some ineffective shading

The set was provided for review by LEGO. All opinions expressed are those of the author.

The Completed Model

Although distinctive in style, the proportions of this model are similar to the more conventional LEGO Art sets released before. The assembled image measures 53cm in height and 40cm across, while the use of round tiles for the background certainly feels familiar. However, this version of Spider-Man looks much more dynamic than a standard mosaic, taking advantage of the three-dimensional construction.

Also, the building techniques are more interesting than I envisaged, avoiding the mosaic panels found in other sets. Instead, the image is constructed in layers, with beams crossing the frame and supporting multiple 16x16 plates. Some are covered with tiles, while others constitute the simple brick structure beneath Spider-Man's body.

Much of Spider-Man's body is only a brick deep, but the shoulders are bulkier. This assembly is cleverly attached using two 4x4 turntables and similar instances of LEGO geometry are found across the set, as the instruction manual regularly highlights. The shoulders also include a ball joint, which combines with another ball joint in the frame beneath to support Spider-Man's head.

This section of the model projects the furthest and includes several printed tiles to represent the hero's web pattern. The webbing is not overly reliant on these pieces though. I like the rounded shape of the head, involving a variety of wedge plates, curved plates and curved slopes, while the eyes incorporate 3x3 quarter dishes to produce the desired shape.

I think the head looks fantastic from the front, but gaps are inevitably visible from either side. Spider-Man was obviously not intended to be viewed from this angle, but the white elements and Technic supports do look awkward, so this should be considered when deciding where to display the artwork.

Fifteen spiders surround Spider-Man, including several on the frame. This number was selected in reference to the character's first appearance in Amazing Fantasy #15 and Peter Parker's acquisition of his powers at the age of fifteen. The spiders are not intrusive, but could probably have been omitted because these spots of black can be distracting when viewed from a distance.

The hands are positioned as though Spider-Man is climbing out of the frame, which I find very effective. Articulated fingers are wrapped around the frame and they look superb, although this does mean the model can only be easily displayed on the wall, rather than leaning against the back of a shelf or similar. Additionally, I wish the right hand was angled downwards slightly, as the wrist currently looks odd.

However, the left arm looks completely natural and includes some appealing black highlights. Another printed piece is placed in the corner underneath, displaying the classic 'The Amazing Spider-Man' logo. The flame yellowish orange colour stands out beautifully and I like the subtle orange dots near the corners, in reference to the Ben Day comic printing process, which uses thousands of small dots to colour large areas.

This process has also influenced Spider-Man's backdrop, which looks wonderful in four shades of green! Only green, bright green and lime green tiles are present below, with spring yellowish green pieces to the left of Spidey's head. This combination of round tiles provides great texture and the brick-built webbing looks fantastic as well, especially where the new 21L flexible tube is wrapped around 12L flexible rods.

Contrasting with the textured background, Spider-Man's body seems relatively flat. There is a mixture of studs and tiles, but a little more depth might have been welcome. Nevertheless, the colour combination is attractive and the shape of Spider-Man's belt, for example, looks splendid. Also, I like the famous spider symbol on his back.

Black elements are used to denote areas in shadow and achieve mixed success. I think those beside the belt and the right arm are effective, but the band passing through the spider symbol, following Peter's spine, is less readily recognisable. I wonder whether a combination of grey and black pieces would have proven better, albeit potentially at the cost of the comic art style.

Like other Art sets, this model is intended to be displayed on a wall. Two Technic hangers are therefore attached to the back and two are undoubtedly needed, as this whole assembly feels quite heavy. As normal, the hangers are recessed into the frame, so the image will hang neatly against the wall, without leaving a gap.

Overall

I enjoyed the original LEGO Art sets and am still awaiting a Jedi companion to 31200 Star Wars The Sith, but 31209 The Amazing Spider-Man reaches another level of quality. Of course, the building experience for this set is much more enjoyable than placing thousands of 1x1 plates and 1x1 tiles, but the resulting image represents an even greater improvement, in my opinion.

Spider-Man looks incredibly dynamic and I love the vibrant green background, especially given its intricate texture. The web looks marvellous as well. In fact, the only notable weakness is the shading in some areas, although even that is somewhat successful when seen from a distance. The price of £169.99, $199.99 or €199.99 seems a little expensive, but even that is not too bad, so I can certainly recommend this set to Spider-Man fans.

32 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in United States,

The Amazing Spider-Man BY JOHN ROMITA SR., you mean.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

“I think the head looks fantastic from the front, but gaps are inevitably visible from either side.”

The Mona Lisa looks a bit average from the side too.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Needs more Batman.

Gravatar
By in United States,

This set releasing is certainly a canon event.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Really love the general direction of the art sets recently. Between this, Starry Night, the Great Wave, and even the modern art set, Lego seems to have finally found a niche for the line with the 3D models. The mosaics were interesting but these few much more classically Lego since they take advantage of the medium with the depth. Can’t wait to see what’s in the pipeline for future sets!

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

I don't think we need to go full Lore Time here. I think we've all sat through enough dead Bens and Gwens and Osborn-mens to know who, what and why this dude is. Let's focus on some lesser-known trivia instead.

- Spider-Man's buggy, which can climb walls, is canon, whether you or Spidey like it or not. Spider-Man may hate that thing, but it just keeps showing up, much to TLG's delight. Chronologically, it last popped up in 'Old Man Logan', where two decrepit have-been heroes use it for their final adventure.

- While Spider-Man generally respects the fourth wall, he is somehow able to tell when you fail to pronounce the hyphen in his name, and will correct you when you refer to him as "Spiderman".

- Peter Parker is widely considered to be one of the smartest people in the Marvel universe, up there with Stark, Pym, McCoy, von Doom, Richards, Banner and Cho, but it would take him half a century to finally earn his PhD. Even then, it wasn't Peter Parker himself who earned the PhD, it was Doc Ock who had taken over Parker's body during the 'Superior Spider-Man'-arc.

- Spider-Man is notorious for pulling his punches. Considering he may be roughly as strong as the Hulk, that's probably a good thing. It might be annoying to deal when half of New York is covered with webs in various states of decay, but that's still not as gross as having to clean up what's left of random muggers after a full-strength Spider-punch turns them into soup.

- Currently, Spider-Man's best frenemy is probably Deadpool, but it used to be the Human Torch. The Torch was supposed to shack up with Spidey and Iceman for the original Super-Friends cartoon, but executives were worried that kids might set themselves on fire to emulate the Torch, so Firestar was invented and starred in his stead. This is probably a good thing - not because children aren't likely to be stupid enough to set themselves on fire, but because Johnny Storm is just a garbage-character. He's just the worst.

- It's not known if the rumour about people eating eight spiders per year in their sleep is actually true. It's also not known if those spiders gain, for the briefest of moments, the proportional powers of a human. If you're worried about missing your quota, just eat your eight spiders at the beginning of the calendar-year to be sure.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Ridgeheart said:
"- It's not known if the rumour about people eating eight spiders per year in their sleep is actually true. It's also not known if those spiders gain, for the briefest of moments, the proportional powers of a human. If you're worried about missing your quota, just eat your eight spiders at the beginning of the calendar-year to be sure."

From what I understand not only is that not true (which makes sense really because what spider is going to be stupid enough to walk into your mouth?) but it’s an untruth created specifically to demonstrated how fast misinformation can travel and spread in the internet

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Brickalili said:
" @Ridgeheart said:
"- It's not known if the rumour about people eating eight spiders per year in their sleep is actually true. It's also not known if those spiders gain, for the briefest of moments, the proportional powers of a human. If you're worried about missing your quota, just eat your eight spiders at the beginning of the calendar-year to be sure."

From what I understand not only is that not true (which makes sense really because what spider is going to be stupid enough to walk into your mouth?) but it’s an untruth created specifically to demonstrated how fast misinformation can travel and spread in the internet "


I heard it was ten spiders in an average lifetime. Which is far more plausible than eight per year, but still hard to believe.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Brickalili said:
" @Ridgeheart said:
"- It's not known if the rumour about people eating eight spiders per year in their sleep is actually true. It's also not known if those spiders gain, for the briefest of moments, the proportional powers of a human. If you're worried about missing your quota, just eat your eight spiders at the beginning of the calendar-year to be sure."

From what I understand not only is that not true (which makes sense really because what spider is going to be stupid enough to walk into your mouth?) but it’s an untruth created specifically to demonstrated how fast misinformation can travel and spread in the internet "


Yeah I'd be more worried about one crawling into my ear while I'm asleep. But in my experience, they usually snuggle under the covers with me and then bite me when I inevitably roll over...

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Sethro3 said:
" @Brickalili said:
" @Ridgeheart said:
"- It's not known if the rumour about people eating eight spiders per year in their sleep is actually true. It's also not known if those spiders gain, for the briefest of moments, the proportional powers of a human. If you're worried about missing your quota, just eat your eight spiders at the beginning of the calendar-year to be sure."

From what I understand not only is that not true (which makes sense really because what spider is going to be stupid enough to walk into your mouth?) but it’s an untruth created specifically to demonstrated how fast misinformation can travel and spread in the internet "


Yeah I'd be more worried about one crawling into my ear while I'm asleep. But in my experience, they usually snuggle under the covers with me and then bite me when I inevitably roll over..."


Yikes, where do you live?
Just so I can mark on my map where not to stop over. Lol :-)

Gravatar
By in United States,

@ResIpsaLoquitur said:
"The Amazing Spider-Man BY JOHN ROMITA SR., you mean."

It’s just John Romita. The son is John Romita, Jr.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Having just built the Great Wave, I can't help but this is rather expensive at double the RRP for just a few hundred pieces more.
(and I only bought that one because it was discounted to €65....)

Other than that, I like the idea, but still feel the execution is somewhat lacking. The 3D-effect is a cool idea, but it looks too much like three separate layers. And considering this is a thing meant to hang to a wall, it should have looked better from other angles.

Still, I hope they keep making more sets like these. I don't care much for the plain mosaics, Ministeck does a better job at that. But make good use of the possibilities Lego pieces offer, and things get much more interesting.

Gravatar
By in United States,

I’mma be honest, when you focus on the shoulders, especially the left one (right from our view), they look sort of weird.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

No interest in Spider-Man so this is an easy pass. However it's a brilliantly executed piece of art so I'm looking forward to releases to come.
Time for a 3-D Frank N Furter perhaps!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@ItisNoe said:
"I’mma be honest, when you focus on the shoulders, especially the left one (right from our view), they look sort of weird."
Patient: Doctor, it hurts when I do this.
Doctor: Then don't do that!

Gravatar
By in United States,

By PurpleDave in United States, 26 Jul 2023 20:55
@blogzilly said:
" @ResIpsaLoquitur said:
"The Amazing Spider-Man BY JOHN ROMITA SR., you mean."

It’s just John Romita. The son is John Romita, Jr.

"

The worst I’ve heard in that regard is Robert “Junior” Lockwood. He gets mentioned once a year on Little Steven’s Underground Garage. His mom shacked up with legendary bluesman Robert Johnson (who even taught Robert Junior to play), and with two Roberts in the house, people started calling him “Robert Junior”. He’s constantly mis-credited as “Robert Lockwood Jr.”, but there’s no Robert Lockwood Sr. He was just born “Robert Lockwood”.

Now, Wikipedia says he was born “Robert Lockwood Jr”, and that his father (divorced) was Robert Lockwood Sr., but Little Steven insists this isn’t true. So, I’m not sure what to think at this point.

Gravatar
By in United States,

My favorite part of this set is the graphic in the corner that says "With great power there must also come great responsibility"

Gravatar
By in Australia,

Spider-Man, Spider-Man, does whatever a spider can...

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

@560heliport said:
" @Brickalili said:
" @Ridgeheart said:
"- It's not known if the rumour about people eating eight spiders per year in their sleep is actually true. It's also not known if those spiders gain, for the briefest of moments, the proportional powers of a human. If you're worried about missing your quota, just eat your eight spiders at the beginning of the calendar-year to be sure."

From what I understand not only is that not true (which makes sense really because what spider is going to be stupid enough to walk into your mouth?) but it’s an untruth created specifically to demonstrated how fast misinformation can travel and spread in the internet "


I heard it was ten spiders in an average lifetime. Which is far more plausible than eight per year, but still hard to believe."


Honestly, I find it very hard to stop at eight.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@Kynareth said:
"“I think the head looks fantastic from the front, but gaps are inevitably visible from either side.”

The Mona Lisa looks a bit average from the side too."


True, but there are no actual gaps in the Mona Lisa from any angle, as far as I am aware.

@NasaNerd said:
"My favorite part of this set is the graphic in the corner that says "With great power there must also come great responsibility""

I do wonder about the author(s) of LEGO press releases sometimes.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@CapnRex101 said:
" @Kynareth said:
"“I think the head looks fantastic from the front, but gaps are inevitably visible from either side.”

The Mona Lisa looks a bit average from the side too."


True, but there are no actual gaps in the Mona Lisa from any angle, as far as I am aware.

@NasaNerd said:
"My favorite part of this set is the graphic in the corner that says "With great power there must also come great responsibility""

I do wonder about the author(s) of LEGO press releases sometimes."


The press releases all sound so similar and yet don't seem like something a person would say... Maybe they're all done by an A.I.?

Gravatar
By in United States,

@PurpleDave said:
"Needs more Batman."
I'm reminded of the comic that came out shortly after the 1989 Batman movie in which a crook asks Spidey, "Who are you?" His answer was, "I'm Bat-*cough* I'm Spider-Man."

@Ridgeheart: “average person eats 3 spiders a year" factoid actualy just statistical error. average person eats 0 spiders per year. Spiders Georg, who lives in cave & eats over 10,000 each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted” One of my favorite memes.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@CapnRex101:
It’s a pretty old painting. No cracks have formed yet?

@560heliport:
“A”? Perhaps. “I”? Perhaps not.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Needs more shading on the derrière.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Wish I cared about spider man ‘cause that’s pretty sweet!!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@PurpleDave said:
"By PurpleDave in United States, 26 Jul 2023 20:55
@blogzilly said:
" @ResIpsaLoquitur said:
"The Amazing Spider-Man BY JOHN ROMITA SR., you mean."

It’s just John Romita. The son is John Romita, Jr.

"

The worst I’ve heard in that regard is Robert “Junior” Lockwood. He gets mentioned once a year on Little Steven’s Underground Garage. His mom shacked up with legendary bluesman Robert Johnson (who even taught Robert Junior to play), and with two Roberts in the house, people started calling him “Robert Junior”. He’s constantly mis-credited as “Robert Lockwood Jr.”, but there’s no Robert Lockwood Sr. He was just born “Robert Lockwood”.

Now, Wikipedia says he was born “Robert Lockwood Jr”, and that his father (divorced) was Robert Lockwood Sr., but Little Steven insists this isn’t true. So, I’m not sure what to think at this point."


That’s interesting. It is confusing when parents name their kids after themselves, I’ll never understand the hubris of it.

I was a “Jr.” for years. It annoyed me so much I changed my name. I was like “Really Dad? You couldn’t come up with something a little more creative?”

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

@blogzilly said:
" @PurpleDave said:
"By PurpleDave in United States, 26 Jul 2023 20:55
@blogzilly said:
" @ResIpsaLoquitur said:
"The Amazing Spider-Man BY JOHN ROMITA SR., you mean."

It’s just John Romita. The son is John Romita, Jr.

"

The worst I’ve heard in that regard is Robert “Junior” Lockwood. He gets mentioned once a year on Little Steven’s Underground Garage. His mom shacked up with legendary bluesman Robert Johnson (who even taught Robert Junior to play), and with two Roberts in the house, people started calling him “Robert Junior”. He’s constantly mis-credited as “Robert Lockwood Jr.”, but there’s no Robert Lockwood Sr. He was just born “Robert Lockwood”.

Now, Wikipedia says he was born “Robert Lockwood Jr”, and that his father (divorced) was Robert Lockwood Sr., but Little Steven insists this isn’t true. So, I’m not sure what to think at this point."


That’s interesting. It is confusing when parents name their kids after themselves, I’ll never understand the hubris of it.

I was a “Jr.” for years. It annoyed me so much I changed my name. I was like “Really Dad? You couldn’t come up with something a little more creative?”"


Just out of curiosity - did you guys happen to own a dog?

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Ridgeheart said:
" @blogzilly said:
" @PurpleDave said:
"By PurpleDave in United States, 26 Jul 2023 20:55
@blogzilly said:
" @ResIpsaLoquitur said:
"The Amazing Spider-Man BY JOHN ROMITA SR., you mean."

It’s just John Romita. The son is John Romita, Jr.

"

The worst I’ve heard in that regard is Robert “Junior” Lockwood. He gets mentioned once a year on Little Steven’s Underground Garage. His mom shacked up with legendary bluesman Robert Johnson (who even taught Robert Junior to play), and with two Roberts in the house, people started calling him “Robert Junior”. He’s constantly mis-credited as “Robert Lockwood Jr.”, but there’s no Robert Lockwood Sr. He was just born “Robert Lockwood”.

Now, Wikipedia says he was born “Robert Lockwood Jr”, and that his father (divorced) was Robert Lockwood Sr., but Little Steven insists this isn’t true. So, I’m not sure what to think at this point."


That’s interesting. It is confusing when parents name their kids after themselves, I’ll never understand the hubris of it.

I was a “Jr.” for years. It annoyed me so much I changed my name. I was like “Really Dad? You couldn’t come up with something a little more creative?”"


Just out of curiosity - did you guys happen to own a dog?"


After only a few moments, I laughed heartily.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@blogzilly:
I’ve got a coworker whose Jr hired in recently as probably his first real job. The first time, it’s a personal choice for sure. The larger the number gets, the more it becomes expected tradition that you have to give a kid the family name. And then there’s a really weird one I ran across, with an actress named Deborah Baker Jr. She reminds me of a more adult-sized Yeardley Smith, but had the misfortune to be cast in only two series so far, and neither ever really found an audience.

@Ridgeheart:
That would be a really weird name for a dog.

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

@PurpleDave said:
" @blogzilly:
I’ve got a coworker whose Jr hired in recently as probably his first real job. The first time, it’s a personal choice for sure. The larger the number gets, the more it becomes expected tradition that you have to give a kid the family name. And then there’s a really weird one I ran across, with an actress named Deborah Baker Jr. She reminds me of a more adult-sized Yeardley Smith, but had the misfortune to be cast in only two series so far, and neither ever really found an audience.

@Ridgeheart:
That would be a really weird name for a dog."


I am 100% prepared to believe that Henry Jones eventually got a new dog and named it "Henry III", just to mess with Indy.

Return to home page »