Review: 75344 Boba Fett's Starship Microfighter
Posted by CapnRex101,
Microfighters were officially introduced in 2014, although the range originated two years earlier with products developed for conventions. These notably include the Mini Slave I available from Star Wars Celebration in 2012. Remarkably, this vessel was never revisited, until now!
75344 Boba Fett's Starship Microfighter greatly improves upon the previous design, taking full advantage of the broader selection of curved slopes and wedge slopes available today. The accompanying minifigure is very desirable too.
Summary
75344 Boba Fett's Starship Microfighter, 85 pieces.
£8.99 / $9.99 / €9.99 | 10.6p/11.8c/11.8c per piece.
Buy at LEGO.com »
75344 Boba Fett's Starship Microfighter is among the best Microfighters to date!
- Perfect cartoonish proportions
- Clever cockpit design
- Neat functions
- Excellent minifigure
- Boba Fett looks strange without his rangefinder
The set was provided for review by LEGO. All opinions expressed are those of the author.
Minifigure
Boba Fett returned to screens with a vengeance in The Mandalorian, requisitioning his battered armour. This minifigure originally appeared in 75312 Boba Fett's Starship and features stunning detail, although the sand green helmet has monopolised discussion. Dark green would arguably be more accurate, but has presumably been avoided because the colour would appear too dark and LEGO would be unable to highlight darker sections of the cheeks.
Personally, I am satisfied with the current helmet colour, although I do think Fett's helmet looks odd without a rangefinder attached. However, that is also an understandable compromise, since the Microfighter's cockpit is fairly cramped. The minifigure is otherwise perfect though, featuring an accurate torso design and continued detail on the legs.
Fett's arms are also nicely decorated, including his classic Mythosaur symbol and wrist-mounted rocket launcher. The scarred head beneath his helmet looks fantastic too, while the minifigure is armed with an EE-3 carbine rifle. This distinctive weapon has been identically constructed since 75222 Betrayal at Cloud City was released.
The Completed Model
Microfighters possess a consistent aesthetic, exaggerating a vehicle's most distinctive features and enlarging its cockpit to accommodate a minifigure. However, the cockpit configuration of the Slave I is among its most recognisable features, requiring a unique interpretation of the existing Microfighters style. Thankfully, I think the resulting model looks superb, balancing accuracy with cartoonish proportions.
Unique among Microfighters, this vehicle includes a functioning cockpit which closes above the minifigure. Moreover, the cockpit is just large enough for Boba Fett to sit in two positions, either as shown below for landing, or upright during flight. I am impressed that the designer managed to provide enough space for this, especially with Fett's jetpack still attached.
The wings are each attached using a Technic pin, so can be rotated separately into position for flight. The model is easily displayed in this configuration, resting on the dark red engine cowling and the boom extending below the cockpit. Furthermore, the flick-fire missiles double as laser cannons, returning to LEGO Star Wars after not appearing in 2021 or 2022.
I was pleasantly surprised by the engine detailing as well, which is simple, but could easily have been omitted altogether. Trans-orange 1x2 plates represent the actual engines, while a 2x2 dish forms the circular docking ring. This engine arrangement is inaccurate, but the dark bluish grey 2x8 plate that interrupts the engines was necessary to strengthen the model.
Overall
Certain vehicles are particularly suitable for Microfighters, transitioning easily and retaining their most recognisable features. I imagine the Slave I has proven rather difficult, given how long this iconic vessel has taken to join the series. Fortunately, 75344 Boba Fett's Starship Microfighter was undoubtedly worth waiting for!
The model is perfect for play, while also faithfully recreating features of the source material and integrating some basic functions. The option to seat Boba Fett for landing or flight is particularly welcome, even though the minifigure is missing his rangefinder. Additionally, I think the price of £8.99, $9.99 or €9.99 represents good value, so would highly recommend this Microfighter.
161 likes
80 comments on this article
The only micro fighter with an actual mostly enclosed space.
Wrong film/show, but I'm pained at the lack of a classic 1x2x5 Han Solo brick.
Also, this is an easy recolor for a new Jango. (The smart thing would have been to release two of these in alternate colors. SIGH.)
Who knew that one of the most feared ships in-universe could be so adorable! Lego has really figured out the Slave I at any scale.
This is a fabulous addition to the MF series! I'll be getting one for me and one for each of my sons. Good details, updated/current Boba figure and an intelligently constructed Slave 1 make this a winner.
His ship was named Slave I...and it had nothing to do with enslaving other beings. I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me.
It's a great cheap way to get that figure. The arms are great for a yellow daredevil purist custom.
It took them long enough to actually get that part right.
@daewoo said:
"His ship was named Slave I...and it had nothing to do with enslaving other beings. I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me."
Fine
@daewoo said:
"His ship was named Slave I...and it had nothing to do with enslaving other beings. I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me."
It's a ten dollar toy for children, not a personal crusade. The woke Disney can't hurt you.
The Artist Formerly Known As Slave I
So glad they didn't skimp out on the printed arms in such a small set <3
@daewoo said:
"His ship was named Slave I...and it had nothing to do with enslaving other beings. I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me."
So brave
Awesome design for such a small set. They could call it the Slave 0.1
@daewoo said:
"His ship was named Slave I...and it had nothing to do with enslaving other beings. I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me."
I've seen They Live, and to be honest I'd rather be woke than asleep. ;-)
...Anyway, It's a neat model. However, I lament the return of flick-fire missiles:
"Somehow, flick-fire missiles have returned." (sorry, but it had to be done.)
@daewoo said:
"His ship was named Slave I...and it had nothing to do with enslaving other beings. I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me."
Slave I? Starship? Let us find a healthy compromise, my friend.
"Slaveship"?
Middle ground: Boba Fett swtiches from bounty hunting to becoming a corporate performance reviewer. If he doesn't give you a good performance evaluation, he comes after you in his Firespray. Hence, it's now called "I evals."
Great little model. But Boba Fett should smile a little bit.
@daewoo said:
"His ship was named Slave I...and it had nothing to do with enslaving other beings. I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me."
very normal reaction to a few words about the size of a thumb being changed on a toy's cardboard box
Anybody needs a range finder? Maybe I have a spare one (or two…). ;-)
Love the ship. Best microfighter in the entire series. I hate the color difference between the helmet/body though. Gonna have to try and get a paint job done for that one...
Let’s avoid the naming drama, it’s stupid and I could care less.
Now on topic with the model. I really do think it’s nice. Lots of MOCs seem to struggle pulling off the design. Proportions honestly aren’t that bad either! The lack of rangefinder is disappointing, but many of us probably have spares, especially from the Mando Battle Pack.
Great looking model, I think the best mirofighter. This is the ship & Boba Fett minifigure I want.
I highly recommend this, the minifigure is one of the best in recent years. I believe many own spare rangefinders, so it's not a problem at all. The build looks nice and can be put against Millenium Falcon MF.
If only they recoloured this and gave us Jango with printed arms...
We’ve toured a few historical sites over the last year, and in different states they consistently use the term “enslaved person” instead of slave.
I guess there was some kind of memo that went out. But equally surprising is that Disney didn’t get the note. It should be “Enslaved Person(s) One.”
Roman numerals being, of course, a damning signifier of the cisheteronormativecolonialist mindset.
And obviously LEGO isn’t doing their due diligence, or they would’ve called Disney out by now on The Electronic Town Square Website Place.
Together we can make a differential equation.
@daewoo said:
"I don't care that woke Disney changed the name. It will ALWAYS be Slave I to me."
Nobody changed the name. This set just has a literal description of being Boba's starship. Nobody is saying you can't call it the Slave I. Have fun tilting at windmills, though, if that's what gets you through this crazy world.
This is one of the best microfighters they have released! I really wish they would recolor the helmet and jetpack, but maintaining the gradient would be harder if they did recolor it. Perhaps they could have recolored the helmet and jetpack to green(The vanilla green color that I can never remember the official name for) so that they could keep the darker colored cheekbones? It would still be inaccurate, but it would look better. I think one of my biggest issues is that the helmet/jetpack aren't noticeably different from his og look. Either way, it's still a solid $10 set.
@dudebrick said:
"Great little model. But Boba Fett should smile a little bit."
“Like a Bantha!”
This is a seriously great little set.
Very cute.
My deepest sympathies to the Adult Men right now whose hearts are breaking because a child's toy packaging doesn't include their preferred pronouns for a spaceship from a live-action cartoon. Let us not forget their deep suffering during this charitable time of year.
Ship is cute! Fig is good!
Looks like Lego have got the beer belly detail on Boba correct.
@saltytbone said:
"Nobody changed the name. This set just has a literal description of being Boba's starship. Nobody is saying you can't call it the Slave I. Have fun tilting at windmills, though, if that's what gets you through this crazy world. "
There are interviews by Lego designers where they state that Disney told them not to use the term "Slave 1" any more. I thought this was common knowledge.
It's a silly Disneysm, but nowhere near as bad at how they changed Boba Fett into the friendliest, morally upstanding crime lord he became in that TV series.
Regardless, fans will always call it Slave 1, and this mini Slave 1 is the cheapest way to get the fat Fett minifigure.
Let’s all stop pretending that we’re now the virtuous ones for calling out someone that doesn’t like the name change.
@monkyby87 said:
"Let’s all stop pretending that we’re now the virtuous ones for calling out someone that doesn’t like the name change. "
I don’t mind it so much anymore. It’s helpful when those who would sell you to the ruling elites to save their own skin self-identify. Let’s you know on whom to keep that proverbial 1 eye.
@peterlmorris said:
"We’ve toured a few historical sites over the last year, and in different states they consistently use the term “enslaved person” instead of slave.
I guess there was some kind of memo that went out. But equally surprising is that Disney didn’t get the note. It should be “Enslaved Person(s) One.”
Roman numerals being, of course, a damning signifier of the cisheteronormativecolonialist mindset.
And obviously LEGO isn’t doing their due diligence, or they would’ve called Disney out by now on The Electronic Town Square Website Place.
Together we can make a differential equation. "
Pls stop reading BabylonBee
As someone who's not into microfighters, I gotta say this looks really good!
I hated this when I first saw the pictures, and now I kind of want it… Thanks a lot, Brickset.
@Prof_Physika said:
" @peterlmorris said:
"We’ve toured a few historical sites over the last year, and in different states they consistently use the term “enslaved person” instead of slave.
I guess there was some kind of memo that went out. But equally surprising is that Disney didn’t get the note. It should be “Enslaved Person(s) One.”
Roman numerals being, of course, a damning signifier of the cisheteronormativecolonialist mindset.
And obviously LEGO isn’t doing their due diligence, or they would’ve called Disney out by now on The Electronic Town Square Website Place.
Together we can make a differential equation. "
Pls stop reading BabylonBee"
thank you!
@MegaBlocks said:
"There are interviews by Lego designers where they state that Disney told them not to use the term "Slave 1" any more. I thought this was common knowledge."
@monkyby87 said:
"Let’s all stop pretending that we’re now the virtuous ones for calling out someone that doesn’t like the name change. "
My point is the name wasn't changed. It's just not on the box. Is it not Boba Fett's starship?
And it's not about being virtuous. It's about putting facts over "they changed the name" statements.
Of course fans will continue to call it Slave 1 because that's what it is. It's all internet BS for people to type strawman comments about "the ruling elites."
Forgot to mention thoughts in my last comment, but - I really like this one! Wasn't aware til this review you could sit Boba in both positions, but that addition alone's prolly enough to make me grab it day one.
Gotta say though, real shame this is the only microfighter in this wave - and if 2022's anything to go by, possibly the only microfighter of the year. More please cheers!
@saltytbone said:
" My point is the name wasn't changed. It's just not on the box. Is it not Boba Fett's starship? "
I don't want this thread hijacked into another slave thread, but it's common knowledge that Disney have told all toy companies not to use the term "Slave 1" in any material.
In the show he calls it Firespray gunship which is the model, like saying Olympic-class ocean liner as opposed to The Titantic.
If I remember correctly, in one of the Star Wars books Boba Fett says it was a mistake to call Slave I Slave I as it implied he had another starship lying around somewhere - Slave II (https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Slave_II). He’d probably be on board with the name change, the enigmatic dog.
@saltytbone said:
"Of course fans will continue to call it Slave 1 because that's what it is. It's all internet BS for people to type strawman comments about "the ruling elites." "
The Lego Movie taught me that everything is awesome, up to and including renaming wonkily-named spaceships from a less-enlightened era, far away and long ago (specifically the Americas, in the 1970's).
I don't care what fans might call it. It will ALWAYS be "Dave I" to me. Or maybe "Steve I", I haven't decided yet.
@Ridgeheart said:
" @saltytbone said:
"Of course fans will continue to call it Slave 1 because that's what it is. It's all internet BS for people to type strawman comments about "the ruling elites." "
The Lego Movie taught me that everything is awesome, up to and including renaming wonkily-named spaceships from a less-enlightened era, far away and long ago (specifically the Americas, in the 1970's).
I don't care what fans might call it. It will ALWAYS be "Dave I" to me. Or maybe "Steve I", I haven't decided yet."
As a ruling elite, this is all going precisely to plan.
@MegaBlocks said:
"Looks like Lego have got the beer belly detail on Boba correct."
The preferred term is 'dad bod,' thanks bod.
@StyleCounselor said:
" @MegaBlocks said:
"Looks like Lego have got the beer belly detail on Boba correct."
The preferred term is 'dad bod,' thanks bod."
Not sure we should be using gendered language like ‘dad bod’. We should also avoid ‘far shaming’.
@gunther_schnitzel said:
" @StyleCounselor said:
" @MegaBlocks said:
"Looks like Lego have got the beer belly detail on Boba correct."
The preferred term is 'dad bod,' thanks bod."
Not sure we should be using gendered language like ‘dad bod’. We should also avoid ‘far shaming’."
Speaking as a dad with a dad bod: no, I actually have a dad bod. I'm not ashamed; I'm just aware that it'd be a good idea for my to drop a few pounds. Also, mmmm, Christmas dinner is coming and I'm still recovering from Thanksgiving.
I'm glad their continuing the micro fighter series, I really like them and this set is an excellent example of why.
There are still some ships I would like to see as microfighters. The inquisitor transport scythe and mando's N1 starfighter as a microfighter would be nice.
Also, when does 75337 get a review!
Remind me, which Star Wars movie was it when this ship was called "Slave 1"?
(Trick question: this ship was never called Slave 1 in any Star Wars movie)
@Ridgeheart said:
"The Lego Movie taught me that everything is awesome, up to and including renaming wonkily-named spaceships from a less-enlightened era, far away and long ago (specifically the Americas, in the 1970's).
I don't care what fans might call it. It will ALWAYS be "Dave I" to me. Or maybe "Steve I", I haven't decided yet."
The LEGO Movie taught me that what we are looking at here is more correctly termed, "spaceship Spaceship SPACESHIP!"
I bricklinked parts for the Celebration Slave I a couple years ago. I think I prefer the shape of this new one
It's lovely!
I just hope we'll get more microfighters than one a year someday again
@AddictedToStyrene said:
"Remind me, which Star Wars movie was it when this ship was called "Slave 1"?
(Trick question: this ship was never called Slave 1 in any Star Wars movie)"
We'll, the official Star Wars website calls it that. https://www.starwars.com/databank/boba-fetts-starship
(Cue the endless debates over whether "if it's not in a movie, it's not official" is a thing. Given that everything *except* the movies called it that, I'd say we're fine.)
@AddictedToStyrene said:
"Remind me, which Star Wars movie was it when this ship was called "Slave 1"?
(Trick question: this ship was never called Slave 1 in any Star Wars movie)"
For the record, the name Slave I is used in Star Wars: The Clone Wars, during the arc when Boba Fett attempts to take revenge against Mace Windu.
@peterlmorris said:
"We’ve toured a few historical sites over the last year, and in different states they consistently use the term “enslaved person” instead of slave.
I guess there was some kind of memo that went out. But equally surprising is that Disney didn’t get the note. It should be “Enslaved Person(s) One.”
Roman numerals being, of course, a damning signifier of the cisheteronormativecolonialist mindset.
And obviously LEGO isn’t doing their due diligence, or they would’ve called Disney out by now on The Electronic Town Square Website Place.
Together we can make a differential equation. "
Glad to know that you want the ship’s pronouns respected.
By the by, ever heard of slave-catchers? Because of course there is absolutely no similarity at all between them and bounty hunters. None whatsoever. So get your mind out of the uncisheteronormativecolonialist gutter.
P.S. By framing that monster portmanteau with derision, are you implying offence at being called cisheteronormativecolonialist or denying being cisheteronormativecolonialist. Cause not gonna lie, but your rant was very saucy, dare I say fruity?
Surprisingly well-executed Microfighter. From the reveals, I was ready to leave this set off my to-buy list for the start of 2023, but now I think it will be nice to get another one. It will go nicely with the Slave I from 2021 that I got that Christmas.
I hope that they'll recolor the design for a Jango Fett's Slave I next year. They've done something like that for Y-wing and X-wing Microfighters.
It's a tad annoying that Boba Fett's helmet and jetpack still doesn't match the rest of his armour, although the rest of the figure looks superb as ever.
A lot of the people here in the comments are acting as if LEGO doesn't regularly give Star Wars sets generic names, such as "Anakin's Jedi Interceptor" instead of Eta-2 Actis-class Interceptor, or "General Grievous' Starfighter" instead of Soulless One. I don't like the name change either, but only because of the context behind the change.
@Torrent_Studios said:
"Surprisingly well-executed Microfighter. From the reveals, I was ready to leave this set off my to-buy list for the start of 2023, but now I think it will be nice to get another one. It will go nicely with the Slave I from 2021 that I got that Christmas.
I hope that they'll recolor the design for a Jango Fett's Slave I next year. They've done something like that for Y-wing and X-wing Microfighters.
It's a tad annoying that Boba Fett's helmet and jetpack still doesn't match the rest of his armour, although the rest of the figure looks superb as ever.
A lot of the people here in the comments are acting as if LEGO doesn't regularly give Star Wars sets generic names, such as "Anakin's Jedi Interceptor" instead of Eta-2 Actis-class Interceptor, or "General Grievous' Starfighter" instead of Soulless One. I don't like the name change either, but only because of the context behind the change. "
You're absolutely right. However, as one lacking in soul (but not phunk), I take offense at the term 'Soulless One.'
@ResIpsaLoquitur said:
" @gunther_schnitzel said:
" @StyleCounselor said:
" @MegaBlocks said:
"Looks like Lego have got the beer belly detail on Boba correct."
The preferred term is 'dad bod,' thanks bod."
Not sure we should be using gendered language like ‘dad bod’. We should also avoid ‘far shaming’."
Speaking as a dad with a dad bod: no, I actually have a dad bod. I'm not ashamed; I'm just aware that it'd be a good idea for my to drop a few pounds. Also, mmmm, Christmas dinner is coming and I'm still recovering from Thanksgiving."
Right there with you. Those Xmas snacky presents and party trays are multiplying around me like they've been bewitched with the Gemino charm (ouch! Hot too!).
Speaking of hotness, study after study shows that women are most attracted to dad bods. This is undoubtedly because it connotes financial and emotional stability. I look in the mirror and fight the good fight everyday.
I don't want anyone to feel ashamed. That's accepting defeat. Fight the good fight! Live a long healthy life. A lil disgust at fat and sloth is a good thing. But, also love yourself everyday and don't hate on a lil jiggle or a nice, full tummy.
Arguably better-executed than 7144. At least this one has an excuse for being too small.
@Torrent_Studios: They've also given us three Millennium Falcon Microfighters.
Good grief Charlie Brown...
Readung thru the comments, when did this section become a breading ground for "woke vs other"..Slave 1 or Boba's ship, body shaming minifigures. Its all ridiculous. The brick is all that should matter here, save the rest for... anywhere else... please.
Look, its a great micro build, its another good review, its a decent price (for once) and the minifigures a winner. The rest doesn't matter. Thank you.
@TheOtherMike said:
"Arguably better-executed than 7144. At least this one has an excuse for being too small."
That was a great set that provided all the required functionality and a new desirable character at a comfortable $20 price point. Well-executed for its time, it was more than satisfying for 6 years until another Boba Fett Slave I was released. I'm sure original Mike would agree with me :)
Although I do like the Boba Fett show well enough, I’m just not a fan of the black garment visually speaking. It makes sense in the context of the show but the minifig doesn’t look great in my opinion.
The ship at this scale is pretty well done though.
I love it, I'll have to add this to my "Bookshelf of Boba Fett". Not too miffed about the lack of rangefinder as I've got several extras.
I thought starship is a word in Star Trek. Isn't that a spaceship?
When I see Microfighters, I always picture the pilots contacting their insurance companies:
"Yeah...Yeah...but seriously, THIS is the REPLACEMENT...I HAD COMPREHENSIVE?!?!"
@curtydc said:
"I love it, I'll have to add this to my "Bookshelf of Boba Fett". Not too miffed about the lack of rangefinder as I've got several extras."
My tired old eyes keep registering that as 'ragefinder'. I'm glad it's not, but in case you truly are looking for incandescent rage, look no further than this very thread.
@ytjedi: I will admit that it was well-executed considering the price point and the parts palette available at the time. And the Mike of twenty years ago had a lot of fun with it.
Boba needs olive green armor and helmet, the print scheme could stay identical to the current parts. Sand green helmet is accurate for TESB Bobas, ROTJ had the base color altered slightly which Lucasfilm stayed close to. The shade Boba used to repaint his armor with is darker than the shade he had before the Sarlacc pit but both of them are closer to olive green than any other shade of green.
I am immensely irritated that nobody talks about wanting olive green Boba parts. The color got introduced in 2012, just months after the first sand green Boba. This decision will apparently affect all releases of non-TESB Bobas until the heat death of the universe. The 2018-Current Harry Potter line already made "nobody cares"-tier alterations to figures like Snape and McGonnagal after just 5 years of the theme, you would think they could do the same to Bobas helmet and jetpack not for accuracy but just to make things feel fresh again. In the same vein Vader needs another TESB/ROTJ torso print again. Last time he had the blue button was the OG 1999 torso. He has been in ANH or ROTS outfits forever which is jarring as most sets he was in during this time are based on TESB or ROTJ. When the printed arms were announced I really though they would use the chance to keep 2 Vader torsos in circulation, instead it's the same one, just with or without arm printing. They print torso pieces in one go, so they really didn't need to print identical torso designs on both parts.
@Montyh7 said:
"I'm glad their continuing the micro fighter series, I really like them and this set is an excellent example of why."
*they're - I was tired, still no excuse.
very cool microfighter
Best low priced set of the year released on the first of January?!
Just thought of a few options on how to mod the engines, aside from that it looks just about perfect.
Nice looking ship, good price !! i'll buy it
@kingalbino said:
"Good grief Charlie Brown...
Readung thru the comments, when did this section become a breading ground for "woke vs other"..Slave 1 or Boba's ship, body shaming minifigures. Its all ridiculous. The brick is all that should matter here, save the rest for... anywhere else... please.
Look, its a great micro build, its another good review, its a decent price (for once) and the minifigures a winner. The rest doesn't matter. Thank you."
Look, a lot of us down here in the comments are genuinely just trying to have some fun. If you didn't catch it, things like body shaming minifigures were pretty obviously sarcasm. None of all that was directed at you, but sorry if you felt offended.
@Anonym said:
"Boba needs olive green armor and helmet, the print scheme could stay identical to the current parts. Sand green helmet is accurate for TESB Bobas, ROTJ had the base color altered slightly which Lucasfilm stayed close to. The shade Boba used to repaint his armor with is darker than the shade he had before the Sarlacc pit but both of them are closer to olive green than any other shade of green.
I am immensely irritated that nobody talks about wanting olive green Boba parts. The color got introduced in 2012, just months after the first sand green Boba. This decision will apparently affect all releases of non-TESB Bobas until the heat death of the universe. The 2018-Current Harry Potter line already made "nobody cares"-tier alterations to figures like Snape and McGonnagal after just 5 years of the theme, you would think they could do the same to Bobas helmet and jetpack not for accuracy but just to make things feel fresh again. In the same vein Vader needs another TESB/ROTJ torso print again. Last time he had the blue button was the OG 1999 torso. He has been in ANH or ROTS outfits forever which is jarring as most sets he was in during this time are based on TESB or ROTJ. When the printed arms were announced I really though they would use the chance to keep 2 Vader torsos in circulation, instead it's the same one, just with or without arm printing. They print torso pieces in one go, so they really didn't need to print identical torso designs on both parts."
Here, have my upvote. Sand green sounds like it'd be fun.
Regardless of the name "controversy," the redundancy of this name irks me:
Boba Fett's Starship Microfighter
could just be
Boba Fett's Microfighter
Let them rename the Slave I. As long as the true fans remember what real Star Wars is, Disney will never win.
Boba Fett’s GUNSHIP is Slave I
Rae Sloane was never in the movies
Star Wars will always belong to the fans
@Padmewan: What about 75223, Naboo Starfighter Microfighter? Or 75264, Kylo Ren's Shuttle Microfighter, which was less redundant and more self-contradictory? There're a whole bunch more, this isn't a new thing.
Well, LEGO has done it. It’s too cute to miss this one. I’ll be buying multiple of this set. Throw a Grogu minifig in there sitting on Boba Fet’s lap.. HeHeHe. Awesome. Nice job on this one. {:)]
I love the microfighters, and this one looks to be a fantastic addition to the lineup!
I really want to see TLG produce some of the microfighters from the recent LEGO Star Wars video game as sets. We need a micro Death Star!
I'm not sure the ability to seat Boba Fett in landing mode is intentional, as he then faces the wrong direction. Also, depending on the movie/series/etc the cockpit doesn't always rotate - in The Mandalorian and The Book of Boba Fett it doesn't iirc. Lastly, no official pictures of the set show him seated like that.