Random set of the day: Star Destroyer

Posted by ,
Star Destroyer

Star Destroyer

©2004 LEGO Group

Today's random set is 4492 Star Destroyer, released in 2004. It's one of 15 Star Wars sets produced that year. It contains 87 pieces, and its retail price was US$7/£6.99.

It's owned by 4561 Brickset members. If you want to add it to your collection you might find it for sale at BrickLink or eBay.

Help me come to life! If you like the set I've chosen for you today, please pledge your support for me on LEGO Ideas so I have a chance of becoming an official LEGO set!


15 comments on this article

Gravatar
By in Australia,

... for destroying tiny stars.

Which would be gravity wells, so they'd already technically be pretty destroyed.

I over-thought that, didn't I?

Gravatar
By in United States,

Ah, the infamous Series 3 of the Minis. Why did they get rid of the bonus model? It really makes me wonder what it could have been.
Series 1 was a TIE Bomber
Series 2 was a Y-Wing
And Series 3 must have been a cloaked ship of some sort, but no ship that small has a clocking device!

Gravatar
By in Germany,

I remember that they used this mini model in the OT / Complete Saga video game, instead of one of the larger and more detailed versions. That was weird.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Graupensuppe :
There are a few possible reasons for this. The obvious one is that it would be a lot easier to model than the first UCS version, and since no minifigs had to interact with it, they may have just gone the easy route on the cut scenes.

The more complex one is an issue of timing. The first UCS set was from ‘02, and definitely lasted long enough to be affected by the ‘04 color change, but probably not long after that. This came out in ‘04. LSW2 shipped in ‘06. The third ISD model looks like it was the first minifig version, 6211 , in ‘06. I believe it’s customary for the IP-based LEGO games to exclusively use current sets when they’re available, and maybe the most recent retired version if there’s no current set (not when they had a crippled game that still needed tons of debugging*). Since both the game and the third ISD shipped in ‘06, they may not have even known about that set when producing that cut scene. The OT game was on a strict deadline, to pair it with the limited edition OT DVD release (the one where the _original_, unmodified theatrical releases were included as “Bonus Features”), hence why the DS version of the game was impossible to finish. Nobody was going to go back and rebuild a cut scene just to work in a newer, far more complex set, and I believe that particular cut scene was used in some of the earliest marketing for the game. So, the set depicted may have still been on shelves when they finished that cut scene, even though it was almost certainly gone by the time the game shipped.

*That’s one of two broken promises that I’m still sore about. They swore that they had finished debugging it, and that when all of the janky copies sold, they’d ship the patched version. Of course, NOBODY wants to buy games that can’t be finished, so that never actually happened. The other broken promise was to release an update for the LEGO Hobbit game to include material from the third movie and, you know, conclude the story instead of just leaving you hanging.

Gravatar
By in Turkey,

I don't collect micro scale Star Wars sets, but they sure do resemble the real thing.

Gravatar
By in Australia,

So LEGO has a ‘no military’ policy, but they release a WWII-era Japanese Battleship, give it Star Wars licensing, and call it a Star Destroyer...

Or that’s what it looks to me.

Gravatar
By in Finland,

It's strange when one wedge plate has the stud notches, but the one next to it doesn't. The one without them is the og Classic Space wedge plate that was discountinued quite soon after.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

@TheWackyWookiee said:
"So LEGO has a ‘no military’ policy, but they release a WWII-era Japanese Battleship, give it Star Wars licensing, and call it a Star Destroyer...

Or that’s what it looks to me."


If you really want to go by that, then every set with a Stormtrooper goes against that policy since the idea was initially used by the Nazis in WWII and that’s where George Lucas got them from.

Gravatar
By in United States,

@PurpleDave said:
"The first UCS set was from ‘02, and definitely lasted long enough to be affected by the ‘04 color change, but probably not long after that."

It was actually available from Lego.com through November 2008.

Gravatar
By in United States,

Star Wars Lego had some great sets that year.

Gravatar
By in United Kingdom,

Great little model but pretty poor PPP ratio for a 16 year old set with no minfigures!

Gravatar
By in Netherlands,

Shouldn't the tower be flipped the other way around?

Gravatar
By in United States,

I have very fond memories associated with this set. It is a Jewish tradition that a bride and groom not see each other for the entire week before their wedding. The night before my wedding, I arrived at my parents house to spend the night there before the big day the next morning and waiting on the bed was a care package from my wife-to-be which included this set and a little white Bionicle guy. I must have mentioned at some point while we were dating that Lego was a big part of my childhood and she remembered that. I was well into my dark ages, but it was such a nice gesture for her to get this for me to help me pass the time without her. I didn't quite like the Bionicle dude (I still find them to be very un-Lego-like and don't like the theme at all) but that Star Destroyer! So nice!

Gravatar
By in United States,

@Slobrojoe said:
" @TheWackyWookiee said:
"So LEGO has a ‘no military’ policy, but they release a WWII-era Japanese Battleship, give it Star Wars licensing, and call it a Star Destroyer...

Or that’s what it looks to me."


If you really want to go by that, then every set with a Stormtrooper goes against that policy since the idea was initially used by the Nazis in WWII and that’s where George Lucas got them from."


Calculate the RRP for every Star Wars set released in 2020 or any other year, then multiply by the many many 1000's of units sold, and you'll understand why Star Wars is the exception to the purity rules...

Return to home page »