Review: 75288 AT-AT
Posted by CapnRex101,
Countless impressive vehicles were introduced during Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, including the monumental AT-AT. Several renditions of the memorable walker have been created and 75288 AT-AT is the biggest among them, containing 1267 pieces!
The model looks absolutely outstanding based upon official images and its announcement provoked considerable excitement, particularly since this rendition of the AT-AT is larger than previous versions. Additionally, I think the new model appears exceptionally accurate and the interior detail has been significantly improved.
Minifigures
Luke Skywalker has accompanied three previous AT-AT models, taking inspiration from his memorable destruction of one such vehicle using a thermal detonator during the Battle of Hoth. This minifigure was introduced with 75235 X-wing Starfighter Trench Run so wears X-wing pilot fatigues instead of an accurate Snowspeeder pilot uniform, that should include white gloves and simpler belt decoration.
These inaccuracies are disappointing, especially since LEGO has produced appropriate attire for Snowspeeder pilots before. Nevertheless, the torso and legs are both highly detailed and Luke's helmet looks good, featuring Rebel Alliance symbols alongside authentic hazard stripes. The dual-moulded helmet from 75218 X-wing Starfighter remains exclusive to the 2018 set.
Unfortunately, part of Luke's double-sided head remains visible underneath the helmet. His alternative expressions look superb though, displaying different smiles and featuring an open visor on one side. This minifigure includes a blue lightsaber, a printed thermal detonator and a grapnel launcher, although the latter accessory is cleverly integrated with the AT-AT.
Several versions of General Veers have been produced, beginning during 2007. This example is substantially more detailed than previous minifigures, wearing an impressive helmet which returns from 75211 Imperial TIE Fighter and includes moulded goggles. The printed decoration complements the moulded detail and I like the double-sided head as well, featuring two expressions and closely resembling the onscreen character.
The torso seems similarly accurate to the source material. I am particularly pleased with the colourful rank indicator on Veer's breastplate and this sand blue armour corresponds with the movie, although dark bluish grey would also have been satisfying. Given his position directing the battle, this minifigure lacks any weaponry but he does carry a pair of macrobinoculars.
One design feature that distinguishes 75288 AT-AT from its predecessors is the cockpit which provides room for two AT-AT Drivers. These minifigures appear outwardly identical, wearing light bluish grey helmets which complement their chest armour and feature exceptional detail. The intricate Imperial symbols and vents look great, although this helmet continues to expose part of the head underneath when viewed from behind.
Unusually, those heads differ when the helmets are removed. The classic Clone Trooper designs have been replaced with generic components, returning from other characters but suiting these minifigures. The smirking face is particularly interesting as that only otherwise appears on Tom Riddle from Harry Potter Magical Treasury: A Visual Guide to the Wizarding World.
Sand blue fabric contrasts against the aforementioned light bluish grey armour and these minifigures sport detailed ejection harnesses. Dual-moulded boots would have been perfect here but the drivers do include accurate life-support packs, featuring metallic silver highlights. They are both equipped with black blaster pistols.
Two armoured Snowtroopers complete this minifigure selection and remain unchanged from 2019, where the same troopers appeared in three sets. Their helmets include lovely moulded detail and I like the different heads underneath, corresponding with the AT-AT Drivers. These components are both relatively common but I appreciate the variation between them and their severe facial expressions seem ideal.
Imperial Snowtroopers wear backpacks during the movie, hence I am disappointed that they have been omitted. Additionally, these minifigures lack fabric kamas. I think the Snowtroopers from 75054 AT-AT, released during 2014, were therefore superior but the torso and leg printing on these cold-weather soldiers is excellent. Each figure carries a standard blaster rifle.
The Completed Model
LEGO has produced five large-scale AT-AT models since 2003, varying quite significantly in appearance and construction. 75288 AT-AT looks particularly distinctive and features unique proportions, with an enlarged head and fewer dramatic angles across the troop compartment. The resultant vehicle appears authentic when compared with the movie and looks absolutely spectacular on display.
Furthermore, this rendition of the AT-AT is larger than its predecessors, measuring 38cm in length and 35cm in height. 75054 AT-AT, by comparison, measures 34cm in length while its height is similar, reaching 34cm. These differences seem relatively minor but the new model also maintains a more consistent width throughout the length of the troop compartment. This whole vehicle therefore seems more substantial than past examples.
Despite its considerable size, the weight is evenly distributed which permits ample articulation. The hips, knees and ankles each incorporate separate hinges and this model feels completely stable, even when displayed in walking positions. Planting each foot on the surface will ensure the greatest stability though. The neck also includes two independent joints, enabling the head to rotate further than on previous AT-ATs.
The cockpit design has remained remarkably consistent between previous AT-AT models, comprising four angled panels which are fixed around the internal structure. However, this rendition deviates from that standard, instead integrating additional panels which soften the external angles and achieve greater accuracy. The new head accordingly seems larger than past examples because the armour on either side is shallower.
Numerous exposed studs are visible across the exterior, although the forward panel is almost entirely smooth. That contrast appears slightly awkward in my opinion but the shaping is great and the seams between different panels look exceptionally neat. Additionally, I love the narrow viewport which is beautifully assembled using brackets and 1x2 slopes rather than relying upon stickers. In fact, this set contains no stickers whatsoever!
Two articulated medium blasters are situated on either side of the cockpit while the famous heavy laser cannons are slung underneath. The relative proportions between these weapons are perfect and two spring-loaded shooters are neatly attached beside the laser cannons. The armour shaping appears equally impressive, most notably behind the medium blasters where wedge plates are layered to create appropriate texture.
AT-AT walkers are traditionally controlled by two drivers and an officer who commands the vehicle. Previous models have only accommodated two minifigures but this AT-AT provides enough space for three characters and various printed control panels. This alteration seems subtle but has necessitated some dramatic changes to the design and the result is excellent, remaining close to the source material.
The interior undoubtedly remains cramped and placing the minifigures inside can sometimes prove challenging. Nevertheless, this internal configuration represents an improvement upon earlier models and I am particularly pleased that the designer has still found enough room to incorporate basic controls which surround the minifigures.
Dark bluish grey Technic steering wheels comprise the ribbed neck that connects the cockpit and the troop compartment. This building technique is ingenious, although various unsightly elements remain visible inside the steering wheels and exposed Technic parts are present towards the back of the cockpit as well. Unfortunately, concealing those pieces would have obstructed the opening access hatch.
Previous versions of the AT-AT have included steep angles around the troop compartment, narrowing rather severely towards the front and rear. This model features the same angular aesthetic which pervades Imperial technology but the shapes seem subtler, hence the entire body section is lengthened. This design corresponds precisely with the film and the variety of studded and smooth surfaces appears perfect here.
That combination is particularly important on each side, where the onscreen vehicles include access hatches. 4x6 plates with twelve studs are therefore employed to great effect here and I love the 1x2 panels which form external ladders. Moreover, the braces underneath the troop compartment appear more accurate here than on past models, featuring recessed notches between the wedge plates.
Despite their appearance, the two exterior hatches cannot actually open. Instead, the central armour panels are connected to Technic beams inside, allowing them to move upwards and reveal the interior. This vehicle is exceedingly spacious, containing sand blue seats for five Snowtroopers. Their unusual colour matches both 4483 AT-AT and the Star Wars: Complete Vehicles reference book which is delightful.
Further to the aforementioned troops, this compartment offers storage for an E-Web Heavy Repeating Blaster. These mighty weapons were introduced during the Battle of Hoth so their accommodation inside an AT-AT seems quite sensible. I appreciate the efficient use of space here, although the E-Web is awkwardly connected to its storage rack and I think the designer could have included attachment points above the seats, occupying that vacant area.
Several depictions of the E-Web have been produced, beginning with an example from 4504 Millennium Falcon. This model hardly resembles other versions, featuring an Aeroblade piece and three pistols from Alien Conquest which form the tripod base. The legs should reach much nearer to the barrel but the remainder of the blaster looks good, particularly where a head from BB-9E faithfully recreates the flash suppressor!
Impressive detail continues towards the back of the AT-AT, where the cylindrical fuel tank is visible. The dark bluish grey angled flags which depict layered armour look magnificent but I think the rounded section underneath should have included greater texture. Furthermore, the gaps between separate panels are relatively visible here, particularly across the top where no suitable wedge plate exists to fill the narrow voids.
AT-ATs can deploy speeder bikes for reconnaissance missions and this model accordingly includes one speeder bike. The same feature appeared in 4483 AT-AT and the location of the speeder garage has remained consistent, inside the rearmost section of the body. Opening the surrounding panels reveals several unsightly Technic elements but permits easy removal of the speeder bike which is perfect for play.
74-Z speeder bikes have appeared in numerous LEGO sets since 1999, featuring diverse designs. This vehicle measures 12cm in length so is smaller than the most prevalent model which varied little between 2008 and 2013. The revised scale appears more accurate beside minifigures and still includes ample detail, most notably around the steering vanes which are exactly the right shape.
These outriggers feel more fragile than previous speeders, although they remain sufficiently robust for play. There is space for one minifigure to sit behind the handlebars and I love the black foot pedals which reflect the onscreen vehicles. Minifigures cannot actually reach the pedals but they look superb and the tan ingot is marvellous too, representing a supply pack. Hopefully the same design will appear with reddish brown accents, whenever the next Endor-based set becomes available.
Another opening hatch is situated towards the front and houses a Technic gear. Turning this gear deploys a string from underneath the AT-AT, forming Luke Skywalker's ascension cable. The cable has appeared with every previous model, although it has never been able to move. Once again, the designer has found use for almost every available space!
The ascension cable can comfortably reach to the ground and retract inside the AT-AT so it remains completely hidden when not required. A hatch is conveniently positioned beside the cable too, allowing Luke to throw his thermal detonator inside! The simulated actuators which flank these functions match the original vehicle but the bright Technic elements on either side are disappointing. These stand out against the light bluish grey armour and are probably the weakest aspect of this entire set in my opinion.
Fortunately, the Technic elements which necessarily support the legs have been integrated extremely well. No colourful pins are visible and the Technic beams are fixed inside each leg, limiting their exposure. The distribution of plates and tiles across each leg looks fantastic and 4x4 dishes cover the joints. Ideally, they would have been decorated to reflect the movie but I can excuse that omission.
Four enormous footpads support the weight of the AT-AT and these remain similar to earlier designs. The ankle structure seems particularly familiar, including 1x6x2 arch bricks that look splendid when compared with the movie. The struts which link the footpads to the legs appear equally authentic and I like the enlarged toe flaps around each footpad, ensuring total stability.
Overall
The majestic Imperial AT-AT is probably the most celebrated ground vehicle from across the Star Wars universe and 75288 AT-AT deserves similar praise. This model appears extremely accurate to the source material and looks spectacular on display, featuring tremendous detail which comfortably surpasses any previous rendition of the AT-AT. The interior is excellent too, accommodating numerous minifigures, supplementary models and enjoyable functions.
Enlarging the cockpit was particularly successful and internal space has been used with the utmost efficiency throughout this whole vehicle. The accompanying minifigures are adequate, although more Snowtroopers would definitely have been welcome and the AT-AT remains the undisputed focus of this set. Additionally, I believe the price of £139.99 or $159.99 represents reasonable value when the size and quality of the AT-AT are taken into account.
This set was provided for review by The LEGO Group but the review represents an expression of my own opinions.
169 likes
50 comments on this article
I’ve gotta find a comparison pic against 4483.
@CapnRex101 do you want to borrow my AT-ATs again? ;)
This is going to be my first AT-AT ever, just waiting for a discount, seems kind of pricey (CAD $200) and I have other sets on my list.
My only AT-AT is the 2003 one (4483), I have to say its always amazing looking at the new models and seeing the improvements over the years. The 2003 one was very fragile, the head would fall off if I just looked at it funny, as such I never played with it much as a kid except when using my snowspeeder to tie it up (and then when the head popped off it was just free battle damage!). I would love to get a new AT-AT, but the models are so pricey I am holding off for a day when I can justify purchasing a second model of the AT-AT (I do own multiple variants of X-Wings, Y-Wings and TIE Fighters over the years though... go figure).
Excellent review. I find this set even more amazing now, can't wait to get one.
Seriously, this set is superior to the 2003 set in every single aspect (which I never saw as the best one, the 2007 AT-AT looked better). Enough with nostalgia for the first version, 75288 (much like 75243 was for the Slave I) is the new definitive AT-AT.
Since I have never had an AT-AT before, and didn't like the First Order version, was very happy with this purchase. It looks great on my desk, and it has plenty of space inside. However, there are some downsides too - it just screams fore 2 more Stormtrooper figures, the front visor should be red and not black, and it needs some more details on the side.
@CapnRex101 - I'm having trouble with the steering vanes on the speeder bike. The tiniest bump and they fall off. Putting the bike into the AT-AT inevitably makes them fall off. Am I doing something wrong.
That's a small issue - The AT-AT itself is magnificent.
Glad they went back to the old rebel pilot helmet. The new one is just awful.
You had me at "no stickers."
I'm not sure increased accuracy will ever have the coolness factor of the walking function of 10178, but for static display this certainly is marvelous.
How did you get yours to be so stable. Mine will can only stand up strait. If even slightly move any of the legs it tends to fall over.
Yes, it is the biggest AT-AT yet in terms of pieces but not by much. It's like every time they increase the piece count by 50 pieces (just like the MF, but at least there are two UCS MF). They really need to make the jump to UCS with at least 3000 pieces. Not gonna pay $160 for basically another system scale AT-AT. Remember back then when the first one was $100 in the same scale. At least they try to improve it structurally.
I like to pick up each new AT-AT, and I have to say, I don’t think I’ve been this excited for one since the original. All the improvements look fantastic, and it looks like a magnificent display piece.
I added a sticker to the back of mine that says "I Heart The 80's", it came in the promo Rocket Raccoon fig
The only thing that I think could make the AT-AT better is more snowtroopers. why give us 5 seats and 2 troopers.
This is great and all. And I also would really like a UCS AT-AT. They must know that we would all buy it, right? I wouldn’t be surprised if one is under development right now, honestly.
This is an excellent set. Leaps and bounds better than the one from 2014 or the AT-M6 from 2017. Great use of space, significant upgrades in functionality and appearance, exactly the right selection of figures... but the $160 price tag is way too high considering the size and number of parts are so similar to previous, cheaper models. They ought to have thrown in a totally revamped Snowspeeder for that much, pretty much the exact same design of that vehicle has been consistently available for sixteen years and it's time for an upgrade.
Hmph, I'll be fair. I agree certain elements are big improvements:
- The feet
- The neck
- The cockpit enlarged to hold two drivers and Veers
- Expanded storage space for E-Web and five Snowtroopers
- New snowspeeder design. That is just wicked. Highlight of the set for me
That said, however, I still cannot see myself placing this one over 4483 as the "best" AT-AT. The "omission" of joint detailing (i.e. printed dishes) that CapnRex101 permitted may be a personal taste statement, but I feel for the overall "look" of an AT-AT in LEGO brick form, it goes beyond that. Merely printing the eight dishes on this AT-AT with mechanical detailing would not solve the issue. The upper joints look comical being the same size as the knee joints. They need to be the size of the 6x6 dishes AND printed. The way it currently is just looks "off" and doesn't evoke the look in Empire Strikes Back. Obviously, the scale and dimensions of LEGO bricks do not permit a perfect replica, but I think 4483 got it right with the legs back in 2003 and it hasn't ever quite been matched or improved since then.
Secondly, by making this the "biggest" AT-AT, other issues are introduced. It looks borderline lanky, and that "subtle" curving of the angles on the top of the armor further weakens the menacing profile that the transport is supposed to have. Though not as large as this AT-AT, 4483 was just as menacing and impressive as its on-screen counterpart. This may have also been helped by the presence of dark gray bricks alongside the standard light gray. It was a sign of LEGO's improvements towards coloration in Star Wars sets after the initial debacles from 1999 through 2001.
That said, if you don't have an AT-AT in your collection yet, I'd recommend you shell out the $160 for this one. Or wait for the sales next year. But let's not laud this as some long-awaited improvement to a vehicle that already has had a superb and majestic representation in LEGO form.
P.S. the head attachment on 4483 wasn't that bad. People are exaggerating. Mine never fell off after initial construction. Yes, I did swing the head from time to time, and while it may have gotten a little loose on the connecting axle, it was easy to just push the entire head onto it and re-secure the connection.
After seeing Empire Strikes Back last Friday in the Theater, as I've always wanted to, and NOTHING was going to stop me from seeing it 1980-style on the big screen.( I don't mind the social distancing measures in place and a practically empty theater was a bonus!)
...anyway, I've just got one thing to say after seeing this review and the movie:
General Veers! Prepare your men!
@Obi_G said:
" @CapnRex101 do you want to borrow my AT-ATs again? ;)"
I actually own them all now, although I have yet to build 4483-1 AT-AT. It seems incredible that six years have passed since I borrowed your sets for the previous review!
Once I have assembled 4483-1 AT-AT, I am intending to publish a comparison between the different models.
Wonderful review, as always, Rex. I'm really pleased with this version of the AT-AT. I own 8129 and 75054, and this one looks superior to both of them. I especially like the improved accuracy of the cockpit shape (and fitting 3 figures!) as well as the size.
Going to ask Santa for this one for Christmas! (aka wifey knows I want this)
I agree about the head of 4483. I have never had that issue at all. Odd.
@Snazzy_Bricks said:
"I added a sticker to the back of mine that says "I Heart The 80's", it came in the promo Rocket Raccoon fig
The only thing that I think could make the AT-AT better is more snowtroopers. why give us 5 seats and 2 troopers."
Or at least make a Hoth Battle Pack available. I appreciate why LEGO doesn't wish to do "themed" waves outside of those for a movie year, but it seems like commonsense to also sell things that complement such a centrepiece set.
Weird, I thought that you already reviewed this beast months ago but oh well, it's still an amazing must buy from and it will look amazing next to the 2003 version at home.
@Lordmoral said:
"Weird, I thought that you already reviewed this beast months ago but oh well, it's still an amazing must buy from and it will look amazing next to the 2003 version at home."
I thought the same too....went looking for it the other day
@EDHS1989
Weird. I also went looking for this review a couple days ago thinking it had already been published.
Great review of a great if slightly pricey set.
It would be really cool to do a full comparison of all 5 large-scale AT-ATs. Please make it happen.
Great set but the lack of Snowtroopers was disappointing. Should have had at least 5 as it has seating for them.
Luckily I was able to get a few more at a reasonable price from a local Bricklink seller.
The thing about he troop compartment and it only has 2 snowtroopers is that if you look at nearly every snow trooper released, they all have backpacks and therefore can’t sit in those seats which kinda sucks. That’s why the backpacks were missed off.
Why am I not smitten by this? It looks good, has lots of features. Yet I find myself shrugging and I don't have an ATAT yet. :S
@Slobrojoe said:
"The thing about he troop compartment and it only has 2 snowtroopers is that if you look at nearly every snow trooper released, they all have backpacks and therefore can’t sit in those seats which kinda sucks. That’s why the backpacks were missed off."
That might also be why they replaced the fabric kama with leg printing. The same Snowtrooper minifigs were also in the Action Battle sets and the 4+ Snowspeeder where they were also intended to be placed sitting down.
I think it’s a testament to the designer of 4483 that it’s owners are so passionate about it - it is a great model and stands up well today. I do like this new version a lot, but it will take a substantial discount for me to consider it.
Thank you for the excellent and comprehensive review CapnRex!
While I agree that this rendition of the AT-AT is superior to previous models in almost all aspects, I have had some issue with posing the legs in configurations other that all four vertically straight and having the AT-AT remain stable. 75054 from 2014 seems more stable to me. Has anyone else had these same issues?
A UCS version is definitively on my top three wishlist for future UCS sets, but the rumour that Lego have had trouble developing stable UCS edition of the AT-AT worries me slightly. If practically possible, would they not have made such a sought-after and extremely popular set already? If anyone has more information on this issue I would love to see it.
@Darth_TNT said:
"Why am I not smitten by this? It looks good, has lots of features. Yet I find myself shrugging and I don't have an ATAT yet. :S"
100% this.
I've wanted an AT-AT for years, and was excited when this one was announced, but now don't feel an urge to buy it at all. Maybe it's just too much money.
Looking back, even the better-proportioned 4483 doesn't look all that desirable. Subjectively, I now feel an AT-AT doesn't seem to translate into LEGO too well; they're so towering, awe-inspiring, and fear-inducing in Empire that these little models can't really do them justice.
Maybe it's about time they did a UCS...
(EDIT: fantastic review though, Cap'n! I don't envy you trying to get Luke to dangle at the an angle that's camera-friendly...)
@vader11 said:
"Not gonna pay $160 for basically another system scale AT-AT. Remember back then when the first one was $100 in the same scale."
Those $100 in 2003 are more like 140 bucks today. It's always easy to point to the lower prices of old sets, but inflation takes its toll, even over a relatively short time.
Finally I don't feel silly buying 75098 and this looks like it's fairly close to scale to the snowspeeder I already Have.
75075 Microfighter and 2012 Advent Calendar versions - still the best.
4483 also came with 4 seats and 2 Snowtroopers, for what it’s worth. I think it’s the best-looking version for display (the others are way too bland and monotone) but this new one has much, much better play value.
P.S. There are instructions out there to correct the head-falling-off problem on 4483. It’s a quick fix and makes a world of difference.
The larger head with side guns looks more realistic and practical for 3 mini-figs, although I found the neck bangles a bit distracting and emphasized by only having a single support beam . The longer back body allowing the parking of a speeder bike and winch for Luke are also great additions.
Thank you for the direct comparison photo with 75054 which show little change in the legs and body, so those who already have an AT-AT can safely spend their money elsewhere, and the rest of us just wait for eventual discounting or maybe dream of a larger UCS with a more realistically scaled snowspeeder for Luke.
@Rob42 said:
" @vader11 said:
"Not gonna pay $160 for basically another system scale AT-AT. Remember back then when the first one was $100 in the same scale."
Those $100 in 2003 are more like 140 bucks today. It's always easy to point to the lower prices of old sets, but inflation takes its toll, even over a relatively short time."
It is still overpriced anyway. The point is, if you already have the previous AT-AT, especially if you have more than one, then it's hard to accept paying $160 for another regular AT-AT. If you quote my whole comment, my point is they should make a UCS AT-AT instead and save people $160 from this. There's 2 UCS MF already but none for AT-AT.
I was a proud owner of 4483 from day one but exchanged it against 75054 when that came out. I still like 75054 a lot and I'm not going to exchange it against this, even if this seems to be superior. It's only slightly superior, I think. Not such a big step up.
I'm glad that you pointed out the wrong Luke minifig. I was shocked to see they are repeating this mistake since some years, probably just to save a few cents? For the 20th anniversary set, I gave them the benefit of a doubt in thinking it's a reference to the black hand minifigs in the 1999 set. Then the Juniors set, ok. It's younger kids, they might not care. But this masterpiece of the year, the one ESB anniversary set we're getting, it still has the wrong minifig? Even if the correct one exists? That entirely puzzles me. And repeating the same mistake over and over, plus putting wrong Anakin and Obi-Wan figures in sets this year, this makes me question if they really do care about their fans. Or if accountants took over. I honestly don't see Hasbro releasing the Black Series Snowspeeder with an X-wing pilot figure. It just wouldn't happen.
great review.
I built the motorised version from my parts bin + BL order. I think I'll mod the head / cockpit with this update.
This and last year's Slave 1 sets are excellent, excellent, highly refined sets with great minifig selections, great builds, and great play features. I wish I could afford them, but I just can't right now. Maybe in another six years!
If this had come with the missing 1/4 of the Shield Generator from the MB Hoth set, it'd be an instant buy from me :-P
I have 75054 and the original 4483; both are good in their own way, but this one seems the most accurate. I don't think there's enough there to warrant a purchase from me, mainly because I reckon I could scrounge up the parts to build it from the ones I've already got.
I agree that this set is a little annoying because it's a vehicle that is remade seemingly quite often; it's galling that we can't seem to get a new TIE Interceptor or Bomber, because 'BS budget reasons', but we can get a new AT-AT every few years, and a new Jedi Starfighter every 3 months.
...and meanwhile the TIE Striker, Major Vonreg's TIE and the Black Ace Interceptor just sit there laughing at us OT fools...I'd honestly be happy with an overpriced DTC 2-pack of the Interceptor and Bomber, but I digress.
I’d love to see a comparison between this and 75189. I know that technically isn’t an AT-AT, but it’s what I own and I treat it as if it is an AT-AT because it is close enough. Obviously the massive troop compartment and the speeder are major differences, not to mention the lack of the cannon and the more boxy shape. However I really want to know if I should try to get this set, or just be happy with what I got. It’s a lot of money that could go towards something more unique in the future, or even towards a UCS set, which is something that would be completely new to me.
This set got such good discounts here in Australia so quickly, and then obviously everywhere immediately ran out of stock. Its literally 33% off RRP at Big W right now if you can actually find it in stock anywhere
In June I built MiSB 4483. Unfortunately due Covid-19 shipment from USA to Poland didn't take 2-3 weeks. It took 2 months and 4 days (sent 20th April, received 24th June).
People are saying they should make a UCS one, but would that even work? Like be stable enough, because it is a really top-heavy thing
If I didn't have the Plus-Size AT-AT by Raskolnikov already, this would be the one for me. It looks great, and it definitely is more stable that the Plus-Size, when the kids get hold of it.
But I guess I really need to get these blue chairs and the new Driver figures.
@nashikens said:
"I’ve gotta find a comparison pic against 4483. "
A guy on Youtube compared all of the AT-AT models next to each other.