President Joe Biden (D) withdrew from the 2024 presidential election. Click here to learn more.

Richard Young (Federal judge)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Richard Young

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!

United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (senior status)
Tenure

2023 - Present

Years in position

1

Prior offices
United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Successor: Matthew Brookman
Predecessor: Gene Brooks

Education

Bachelor's

Drake University, 1975

Law

George Mason University School of Law, 1980

Personal
Birthplace
Davenport, Iowa


Richard Young is a federal judge on senior status with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. He joined the court in 1998 after being nominated by President Bill Clinton. Young served as chief judge of the district court from 2009 to 2016. He assumed senior status on March 31, 2023.

Matthew Brookman was nominated by President Joe Biden (D) to replace Young on the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on January 3, 2023.

Early life and education

Born in Davenport, Louisiana, Young graduated from Drake University with his bachelor's degree in 1975 and received a Juris Doctor degree from George Mason University School of Law in 1980.[1]

Professional career

Young was a private practice attorney in Indiana from 1980 to 1990. Young served as a public defender for Vanderburgh County from 1983 to 1985 and also served as corporation counsel for the City of Evansville from 1985 to 1987. Young was a circuit court judge in the Vanderburgh County Circuit Court from 1990 to 1998.[1]

Judicial career

Southern District of Indiana

On the recommendation of U.S. Senator Evan Bayh, Young was nominated to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana by President Bill Clinton on July 15, 1997, to a seat vacated by Gene Brooks as Brooks assumed senior status. Young was confirmed by the Senate on March 2, 1998, on a Senate vote and received commission on March 6, 1998.[2] He assumed senior status on March 31, 2023.[1]

Noteworthy cases

Judge strikes down law requiring doctors to report on abortion complications (2018)

See also: United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (PPINK v. Commissioner, Indiana State Department of Health, 1:18-cv-1219-RLY-DLP)

On June 28, Judge Richard Young issued an injunction prohibiting Indiana from implementing Senate Enrolled Act (SEA) 340, which requires healthcare providers to report 26 types of abortion complications to the state health department. Gov. Eric Holcomb (R) signed SEA 340 on March 25, 2018. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky sued in May 2018. Judge Young said the law was too vague and violated Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky's right to due process.[3][4]

Judge rules that Indiana must recognize same-sex marriages from other states (2014)

See also: United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Bowling v Pence, 1:14-cv-00405-RLY-TAB)

Judge Richard Young's ruling on August 19, 2014, held that Indiana's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. This was not the judge's first decision to allow such marriages in the state. A couple months prior, he made a similar decision (see below). However, his rulings had been stayed pending appeal.

At issue in Bowling v. Pence was whether Indiana would recognize same-sex marriages that occurred in other states.[5]

Young also touched on the issue of whether Governor Mike Pence should be included in the same-sex marriage lawsuits. Pence had previously argued that he had no authority to enforce the state's same-sex marriage laws. However, after Young first struck down the state's ban on such marriages in June, Gov. Pence issued a memo saying that the ban was still effective and that the judge's ruling should be disregarded. Young responded, writing in the Bowling order:

The court, after witnessing the Governor do what he claimed he could not do, reverses course and finds him to be a proper party to such lawsuits. The court wishes to reiterate that it finds the Governor's prior representations contradicting such authority to be, at a minimum, troubling.[6][7]

Indiana must recognize out of state same-sex marriage (2014)

See also: United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (BASKIN V. BOGAN, 1:14-cv-00355-RLY-TAB)

Judge Richard Young was the presiding judge in a case where same-sex couples wanted their marriages to be recognized in Indiana. Judge Young expedited a ruling for one of the couples in the case, the couple of Amy Sandler and Niki Quasney. In 2009, Quasney was diagnosed with ovarian cancer. She and her spouse Sandler were legally married in Massachusetts and sued to have their marriage recognized in Indiana so that when Quasney passed away they could have an accurate death certificate that would allow Sandler to take care of their children and assets.[8] Judge Young issued a 28-day injunction on April 10, 2014, allowing only their marriage to be recognized during this time.[8]

Judge Young made the injunction permanent in a ruling on May 8, 2014. The ruling meant that Indiana would be required to recognize Sandler and Quasney's marriage indefinitely.[9]

Indiana must perform and recognize same-sex marriages (2014)

See also: United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (BASKIN V. BOGAN, 1:14-cv-00406-RLY-MJD)

Judge Richard Young ruled on June 25, 2014, that Indiana must recognize and allow same-sex marriage. Young issued a permanent injunction requiring the state to immediately start performing same-sex marriages. Similar to the other same-sex marriage rulings, Judge Young found the state in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment:

The court agrees with Plaintiffs. “Fundamental rights, once recognized, cannot be denied to particular groups on the ground that these groups have historically been denied those rights.”[10][7]

Judge Young consolidated two other Indiana cases, Lee v. Pence and Midori Fujii v. State of Indiana, into the Baskin v. Bogan ruling on June 27, 2014. He chose not to stay his ruling pending an appeal but the Seventh Circuit issued a stay on June 27, 2014.[11][12]

See also

External links


Footnotes