Simple and statistically sound recommendations for analysing physical theories
Authors:
Shehu S. AbdusSalam,
Fruzsina J. Agocs,
Benjamin C. Allanach,
Peter Athron,
Csaba Balázs,
Emanuele Bagnaschi,
Philip Bechtle,
Oliver Buchmueller,
Ankit Beniwal,
Jihyun Bhom,
Sanjay Bloor,
Torsten Bringmann,
Andy Buckley,
Anja Butter,
José Eliel Camargo-Molina,
Marcin Chrzaszcz,
Jan Conrad,
Jonathan M. Cornell,
Matthias Danninger,
Jorge de Blas,
Albert De Roeck,
Klaus Desch,
Matthew Dolan,
Herbert Dreiner,
Otto Eberhardt
, et al. (50 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Physical theories that depend on many parameters or are tested against data from many different experiments pose unique challenges to statistical inference. Many models in particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology fall into one or both of these categories. These issues are often sidestepped with statistically unsound ad hoc methods, involving intersection of parameter intervals estimated by mul…
▽ More
Physical theories that depend on many parameters or are tested against data from many different experiments pose unique challenges to statistical inference. Many models in particle physics, astrophysics and cosmology fall into one or both of these categories. These issues are often sidestepped with statistically unsound ad hoc methods, involving intersection of parameter intervals estimated by multiple experiments, and random or grid sampling of model parameters. Whilst these methods are easy to apply, they exhibit pathologies even in low-dimensional parameter spaces, and quickly become problematic to use and interpret in higher dimensions. In this article we give clear guidance for going beyond these procedures, suggesting where possible simple methods for performing statistically sound inference, and recommendations of readily-available software tools and standards that can assist in doing so. Our aim is to provide any physicists lacking comprehensive statistical training with recommendations for reaching correct scientific conclusions, with only a modest increase in analysis burden. Our examples can be reproduced with the code publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4322283.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2022; v1 submitted 17 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
