-
Validation of the Alfvén Wave Solar atmosphere Model (AWSoM) with Observations from the Low Corona to 1 AU
Authors:
N. Sachdeva,
B. van der Holst,
W. B. Manchester,
G. Tóth,
Y. Chen,
D. G. Lloveras,
A. M. Vásquez,
Philippe Lamy,
Julien Wojak,
B. V. Jackson,
H. -S. Yu,
C. J. Henney
Abstract:
We perform a validation study of the latest version of the Alfvén Wave Solar atmosphere Model (AWSoM) within the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF). To do so, we compare the simulation results of the model with a comprehensive suite of observations for Carrington rotations representative of the solar minimum conditions extending from the solar corona to the heliosphere up to the Earth. In the…
▽ More
We perform a validation study of the latest version of the Alfvén Wave Solar atmosphere Model (AWSoM) within the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF). To do so, we compare the simulation results of the model with a comprehensive suite of observations for Carrington rotations representative of the solar minimum conditions extending from the solar corona to the heliosphere up to the Earth. In the low corona ($r < 1.25$ \Rs), we compare with EUV images from both STEREO-A/EUVI and SDO/AIA and to three-dimensional (3-D) tomographic reconstructions of the electron temperature and density based on these same data. We also compare the model to tomographic reconstructions of the electron density from SOHO/LASCO observations ($2.55 < r < 6.0$\Rs). In the heliosphere, we compare model predictions of solar wind speed with velocity reconstructions from InterPlanetary Scintillation (IPS) observations. For comparison with observations near the Earth, we use OMNI data. Our results show that the improved AWSoM model performs well in quantitative agreement with the observations between the inner corona and 1 AU. The model now reproduces the fast solar wind speed in the polar regions. Near the Earth, our model shows good agreement with observations of solar wind velocity, proton temperature and density. AWSoM offers an extensive application to study the solar corona and larger heliosphere in concert with current and future solar missions as well as being well suited for space weather predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
On the GBM event seen 0.4 sec after GW 150914
Authors:
J. Greiner,
J. M. Burgess,
V. Savchenko,
H. -F. Yu
Abstract:
In view of the recent report by Connaughton we analyse continuous TTE data of Fermi-GBM around the time of the gravitational wave event GW 150914. We find that after proper accounting for low count statistics, the GBM transient event at 0.4 s after GW 150914 is likely not due to an astrophysical source, but consistent with a background fluctuation, removing the tension between the INTEGRAL/ACS non…
▽ More
In view of the recent report by Connaughton we analyse continuous TTE data of Fermi-GBM around the time of the gravitational wave event GW 150914. We find that after proper accounting for low count statistics, the GBM transient event at 0.4 s after GW 150914 is likely not due to an astrophysical source, but consistent with a background fluctuation, removing the tension between the INTEGRAL/ACS non-detection and GBM. Additionally, reanalysis of other short GRBs shows that without proper statistical modeling the fluence of faint events is over-predicted, as verified for some joint GBM-ACS detections of short GRBs. We detail the statistical procedure to correct these biases. As a result, faint short GRBs, verified by ACS detections, with significances in the broad-band light curve even smaller than that of the GBM-GW150914 event are recovered as proper non-zero source, while the GBM-GW150914 event is consistent with zero fluence.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2016; v1 submitted 1 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Supplement: Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the dif…
▽ More
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the different bands.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared wit…
▽ More
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared with 63 teams of observers covering radio, optical, near-infrared, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths with ground- and space-based facilities. In this Letter we describe the low-latency analysis of the GW data and present the sky localization of the first observed compact binary merger. We summarize the follow-up observations reported by 25 teams via private Gamma-ray Coordinates Network circulars, giving an overview of the participating facilities, the GW sky localization coverage, the timeline and depth of the observations. As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic (EM) signature. Nevertheless, this first broadband campaign to search for a counterpart of an Advanced LIGO source represents a milestone and highlights the broad capabilities of the transient astronomy community and the observing strategies that have been developed to pursue neutron star binary merger events. Detailed investigations of the EM data and results of the EM follow-up campaign are being disseminated in papers by the individual teams.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Localization of Gamma-Ray Bursts using the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Authors:
V. Connaughton,
M. S. Briggs,
A. Goldstein,
C. A. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas,
R. D. Preece,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
M. H. Gibby,
J. Greiner,
D. Gruber,
P. Jenke,
R. M. Kippen,
V. Pelassa,
S. Xiong,
H. -F. Yu,
P. N. Bhat,
J. M. Burgess,
D. Byrne,
G. Fitzpatrick,
S. Foley,
M. M. Giles,
S. Guiriec,
A. J. van der Horst,
A. von Kienlin,
S. McBreen
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected over 1400 Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) since it began science operations in July, 2008. We use a subset of over 300 GRBs localized by instruments such as Swift, the Fermi Large Area Telescope, INTEGRAL, and MAXI, or through triangulations from the InterPlanetary Network (IPN), to analyze the accuracy of GBM GRB localizations. We find that the reporte…
▽ More
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected over 1400 Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) since it began science operations in July, 2008. We use a subset of over 300 GRBs localized by instruments such as Swift, the Fermi Large Area Telescope, INTEGRAL, and MAXI, or through triangulations from the InterPlanetary Network (IPN), to analyze the accuracy of GBM GRB localizations. We find that the reported statistical uncertainties on GBM localizations, which can be as small as 1 degree, underestimate the distance of the GBM positions to the true GRB locations and we attribute this to systematic uncertainties. The distribution of systematic uncertainties is well represented (68% confidence level) by a 3.7 degree Gaussian with a non-Gaussian tail that contains about 10% of GBM-detected GRBs and extends to approximately 14 degrees. A more complex model suggests that there is a dependence of the systematic uncertainty on the position of the GRB in spacecraft coordinates, with GRBs in the quadrants on the Y-axis better localized than those on the X-axis.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
GROND coverage of the main peak of Gamma-Ray Burst 130925A
Authors:
J. Greiner,
H. -F. Yu,
T. Krühler,
D. D. Frederiks,
A. Beloborodov,
P. N. Bhat,
J. Bolmer,
H. van Eerten,
R. L. Aptekar,
J. Elliott,
S. V. Golenetskii,
J. F. Graham,
K. Hurley,
D. A. Kann,
S. Klose,
A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu,
A. Rau,
P. Schady,
S. Schmidl,
V. Sudilovsky,
D. S. Svinkin,
M. Tanga,
M. V. Ulanov,
K. Varela,
A. von Kienlin
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Prompt or early optical emission in gamma-ray bursts is notoriously difficult to measure, and observations of the dozen cases show a large variety of properties. Yet, such early emission promises to help us achieve a better understanding of the GRB emission process(es).
We performed dedicated observations of the ultra-long duration (T90 about 7000 s) GRB 130925A in the optical/near-infrared with…
▽ More
Prompt or early optical emission in gamma-ray bursts is notoriously difficult to measure, and observations of the dozen cases show a large variety of properties. Yet, such early emission promises to help us achieve a better understanding of the GRB emission process(es).
We performed dedicated observations of the ultra-long duration (T90 about 7000 s) GRB 130925A in the optical/near-infrared with the 7-channel "Gamma-Ray Burst Optical and Near-infrared Detector" (GROND) at the 2.2m MPG/ESO telescope. We detect an optical/NIR flare with an amplitude of nearly 2 mag which is delayed with respect to the keV--MeV prompt emission by about 300--400 s. The decay time of this flare is shorter than the duration of the flare (500 s) or its delay.
While we cannot offer a straightforward explanation, we discuss the implications of the flare properties and suggest ways toward understanding it.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Simultaneous optical/gamma-ray observations of GRB 121217's prompt emission
Authors:
J. Elliott,
H. -F. Yu,
S. Schmidl,
J. Greiner,
D. Gruber,
S. Oates,
S. Kobayashi,
B. Zhang,
J. R. Cummings,
R. Filgas,
N. Gehrels,
D. Grupe,
D. A. Kann,
S. Klose,
T. Krühler,
A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu,
A. Rau,
A. Rossi,
M. Siegel,
P. Schady,
V. Sudilovsky,
M. Tanga,
K. Varela
Abstract:
Since the advent of the Swift satellite it has been possible to obtain precise localisations of GRB positions of sub-arcsec accuracy within seconds, facilitating ground-based robotic telescopes to automatically slew to the target within seconds. This has yielded a plethora of observational data for the afterglow phase of the GRB, but the quantity of data (<2 keV) covering the initial prompt emissi…
▽ More
Since the advent of the Swift satellite it has been possible to obtain precise localisations of GRB positions of sub-arcsec accuracy within seconds, facilitating ground-based robotic telescopes to automatically slew to the target within seconds. This has yielded a plethora of observational data for the afterglow phase of the GRB, but the quantity of data (<2 keV) covering the initial prompt emission still remains small. Only in a handful of cases has it been possible obtain simultaneous coverage of the prompt emission in a multi-wavelength regime (gamma-ray to optical), as a result of: observing the field by chance prior to the GRB (e.g. 080319B/naked-eye burst), long-prompt emission (e.g., 080928, 110205A) or triggered on a pre-cursor (e.g., 041219A, 050820A, 061121). This small selection of bursts have shown both correlated and uncorrelated gamma-ray and optical light curve behaviour, and the multi-wavelength emission mechanism remains far from resolved (i.e. single population synchrotron self-Component, electron distributions, additional neutron components or residual collisions). Such multi-wavelength observations during the GRB prompt phase are pivotal in providing further insight on the poorly understood prompt emission mechanism. We add to this small sample the Swift burst 121217A that had two distinct periods of prompt emission separated by ~700 s, observed by Swift/BAT, Swift/XRT and Fermi/GBM. As a result of the time delay of the second emission, it enabled optical imaging (from 3 to 7 bands) to be taken with the GROND instrument to a resolution as fine as 10s. This multi-wavelength data will hopefully allow us to shed more light on the current picture of prompt emission physics.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Prompt emission of GRB 121217A from gamma-rays to the NIR
Authors:
J. Elliott,
H. -F. Yu,
S. Schmidl,
J. Greiner,
D. Gruber,
S. Oates,
S. Kobayashi,
B. Zhang,
J. R. Cummings,
R. Filgas,
N. Gehrels,
D. Grupe,
D. A. Kann,
S. Klose,
T. Krühler,
A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu,
A. Rau,
A. Rossi,
M. Siegel,
P. Schady,
V. Sudilovsky,
M. Tanga,
K. Varela
Abstract:
The mechanism that causes the prompt-emission episode of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is still widely debated despite there being thousands of prompt detections. The favoured internal shock model relates this emission to synchrotron radiation. However, it does not always explain the spectral indices of the shape of the spectrum, often fit with empirical functions. Multi-wavelength observations are ther…
▽ More
The mechanism that causes the prompt-emission episode of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is still widely debated despite there being thousands of prompt detections. The favoured internal shock model relates this emission to synchrotron radiation. However, it does not always explain the spectral indices of the shape of the spectrum, often fit with empirical functions. Multi-wavelength observations are therefore required to help investigate the possible underlying mechanisms that causes the prompt emission. We present GRB 121217A, for which we were able to observe its near-infrared (NIR) emission during a secondary prompt-emission episode with the Gamma-Ray Burst Optical Near-infrared Detector (GROND) in combination with the Swift and Fermi satellites, covering an energy range of 0.001 keV to 100 keV. We determine a photometric redshift of z=3.1+/-0.1 with a line-of-sight extinction of A_V~0 mag, utilising the optical/NIR SED. From the afterglow, we determine a bulk Lorentz factor of Gamma~250 and an emission radius of R<10^18 cm. The prompt-emission broadband spectral energy distribution is well fit with a broken power law with b1=-0.3+/-0.1, b2=0.6+/-0.1 that has a break at E=6.6+/-0.9 keV, which can be interpreted as the maximum injection frequency. Self-absorption by the electron population below energies of E_a<6 keV suggest a magnetic field strength of B~10^5 G. However, all the best fit models underpredict the flux observed in the NIR wavelengths, which also only rebrightens by a factor of ~2 during the second prompt emission episode, in stark contrast to the X-ray emission, which rebrightens by a factor of ~100, suggesting an afterglow component is dominating the emission. We present GRB 121217A one of the few GRBs for which there are multi-wavelength observations of the prompt-emission period and show that it can be understood with a synchrotron radiation model.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
The First Pulse of the Extremely Bright GRB 130427A: A Test Lab for Synchrotron Shocks
Authors:
R. Preece,
J. Michael Burgess,
A. von Kienlin,
P. N. Bhat,
M. S. Briggs,
D. Byrne,
V. Chaplin,
W. Cleveland,
A. C. Collazzi,
V. Connaughton,
A. Diekmann,
G. Fitzpatrick,
S. Foley,
M. Gibby,
M. Giles,
A. Goldstein,
J. Greiner,
D. Gruber,
P. Jenke,
R. M. Kippen,
C. Kouveliotou,
S. McBreen,
C. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas,
V. Pelassa
, et al. (134 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gamma-ray burst (GRB) 130427A is one of the most energetic GRBs ever observed. The initial pulse up to 2.5 s is possibly the brightest well-isolated pulse observed to date. A fine time resolution spectral analysis shows power-law decays of the peak energy from the onset of the pulse, consistent with models of internal synchrotron shock pulses. However, a strongly correlated power-law behavior is o…
▽ More
Gamma-ray burst (GRB) 130427A is one of the most energetic GRBs ever observed. The initial pulse up to 2.5 s is possibly the brightest well-isolated pulse observed to date. A fine time resolution spectral analysis shows power-law decays of the peak energy from the onset of the pulse, consistent with models of internal synchrotron shock pulses. However, a strongly correlated power-law behavior is observed between the luminosity and the spectral peak energy that is inconsistent with curvature effects arising in the relativistic outflow. It is difficult for any of the existing models to account for all of the observed spectral and temporal behaviors simultaneously.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
