Comparison of Pulsar Positions from Timing and Very Long Baseline Astrometry
Authors:
J. B. Wang,
W. A. Coles,
G. Hobbs,
R. M. Shannon,
R. N. Manchester,
M. Kerr,
J. P. Yuan,
N. Wang,
M. Bailes,
N. D. R. Bhat,
S. Dai J. Dempsey,
M. J. Keith,
P. D. Lasky,
Y. Levin,
S. Os lowski,
V. Ravi,
D. J. Reardon,
P A. Rosado,
C. J. Russell,
R. Spiewak,
W. van Straten,
L. Toomey,
L. Wen,
X. -P. You,
X. -J. Zhu
Abstract:
Pulsar positions can be measured with high precision using both pulsar timing methods and very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI). Pulsar timing positions are referenced to a solar-system ephemeris, whereas VLBI positions are referenced to distant quasars. Here we compare pulsar positions from published VLBI measurements with those obtained from pulsar timing data from the Nanshan and Parkes radi…
▽ More
Pulsar positions can be measured with high precision using both pulsar timing methods and very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI). Pulsar timing positions are referenced to a solar-system ephemeris, whereas VLBI positions are referenced to distant quasars. Here we compare pulsar positions from published VLBI measurements with those obtained from pulsar timing data from the Nanshan and Parkes radio telescopes in order to relate the two reference frames. We find that the timing positions differ significantly from the VLBI positions (and also differ between different ephemerides). A statistically significant change in the obliquity of the ecliptic of $2.16\pm0.33$\,mas is found for the JPL ephemeris DE405, but no significant rotation is found in subsequent JPL ephemerides. The accuracy with which we can relate the two frames is limited by the current uncertainties in the VLBI reference source positions and in matching the pulsars to their reference source. Not only do the timing positions depend on the ephemeris used in computing them, but also different segments of the timing data lead to varying position estimates. These variations are mostly common to all ephemerides, but slight changes are seen at the 10$μ$as level between ephemerides.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
The disturbance of a millisecond pulsar magnetosphere
Authors:
R. M. Shannon,
L. T. Lentati,
M. Kerr,
M. Bailes,
N. D. R. Bhat,
W. A. Coles,
S. Dai,
J. Dempsey,
G. Hobbs,
M. J. Keith,
P. D. Lasky,
Y. Levin,
R. N. Manchester,
S. Oslowski,
V. Ravi,
D. J. Reardon,
P. A. Rosado,
R. Spiewak,
W. van Straten,
L. Toomey,
J. -B. Wang,
L. Wen,
X. -P. You,
X. -J. Zhu
Abstract:
Pulsar timing has enabled some of the strongest tests of fundamental physics. Central to the technique is the assumption that the detected radio pulses can be used to accurately measure the rotation of the pulsar. Here we report on a broad-band variation in the pulse profile of the millisecond pulsar J1643-1224. A new component of emission suddenly appears in the pulse profile, decays over 4 month…
▽ More
Pulsar timing has enabled some of the strongest tests of fundamental physics. Central to the technique is the assumption that the detected radio pulses can be used to accurately measure the rotation of the pulsar. Here we report on a broad-band variation in the pulse profile of the millisecond pulsar J1643-1224. A new component of emission suddenly appears in the pulse profile, decays over 4 months, and results in a permanently modified pulse shape. Profile variations such as these may be the origin of timing noise observed in other millisecond pulsars. The sensitivity of pulsar-timing observations to gravitational radiation can be increased by accounting for this variability.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
