-
Designing an Optimal Kilonova Search using DECam for Gravitational Wave Events
Authors:
C. R. Bom,
J. Annis,
A. Garcia,
A. Palmese,
N. Sherman,
M. Soares-Santos,
L. Santana-Silva,
R. Morgan,
K. Bechtol,
T. Davis,
H. T. Diehl,
S. S. Allam,
T. G. Bachmann,
B. M. O. Fraga,
J. Garcıa-Bellido,
M. S. S. Gill,
K. Herner,
C. D. Kilpatrick,
M. Makler,
F. Olivares E.,
M. E. S. Pereira,
J. Pineda,
A. Santos,
D. L. Tucker,
M. P. Wiesner
, et al. (45 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We address the problem of optimally identifying all kilonovae detected via gravitational wave emission in the upcoming LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA Collaboration observing run, O4, which is expected to be sensitive to a factor of $\sim 7$ more Binary Neutron Stars alerts than previously. Electromagnetic follow-up of all but the brightest of these new events will require $>1$ meter telescopes, for which limite…
▽ More
We address the problem of optimally identifying all kilonovae detected via gravitational wave emission in the upcoming LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA Collaboration observing run, O4, which is expected to be sensitive to a factor of $\sim 7$ more Binary Neutron Stars alerts than previously. Electromagnetic follow-up of all but the brightest of these new events will require $>1$ meter telescopes, for which limited time is available. We present an optimized observing strategy for the Dark Energy Camera during O4. We base our study on simulations of gravitational wave events expected for O4 and wide-prior kilonova simulations. We derive the detectabilities of events for realistic observing conditions. We optimize our strategy for confirming a kilonova while minimizing telescope time. For a wide range of kilonova parameters, corresponding to a fainter kilonova compared to GW170817/AT2017gfo we find that, with this optimal strategy, the discovery probability for electromagnetic counterparts with the Dark Energy Camera is $\sim 80\%$ at the nominal binary neutron star gravitational wave detection limit for the next LVK observing run (190 Mpc), which corresponds to a $\sim 30\%$ improvement compared to the strategy adopted during the previous observing run. For more distant events ($\sim 330$ Mpc), we reach a $\sim 60\%$ probability of detection, a factor of $\sim 2$ increase. For a brighter kilonova model dominated by the blue component that reproduces the observations of GW170817/AT2017gfo, we find that we can reach $\sim 90\%$ probability of detection out to 330 Mpc, representing an increase of $\sim 20 \%$, while also reducing the total telescope time required to follow-up events by $\sim 20\%$.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 9 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
The impact of human expert visual inspection on the discovery of strong gravitational lenses
Authors:
Karina Rojas,
Thomas E. Collett,
Daniel Ballard,
Mark R. Magee,
Simon Birrer,
Elizabeth Buckley-Geer.,
James H. H. Chan,
Benjamin Clément,
José M. Diego,
Fabrizio Gentile,
Jimena González,
Rémy Joseph,
Jorge Mastache,
Stefan Schuldt,
Crescenzo Tortora,
Tomás Verdugo,
Aprajita Verma,
Tansu Daylan,
Martin Millon,
Neal Jackson,
Simon Dye,
Alejandra Melo,
Guillaume Mahler,
Ricardo L. C. Ogando,
Frédéric Courbin
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We investigate the ability of human 'expert' classifiers to identify strong gravitational lens candidates in Dark Energy Survey like imaging. We recruited a total of 55 people that completed more than 25$\%$ of the project. During the classification task, we present to the participants 1489 images. The sample contains a variety of data including lens simulations, real lenses, non-lens examples, an…
▽ More
We investigate the ability of human 'expert' classifiers to identify strong gravitational lens candidates in Dark Energy Survey like imaging. We recruited a total of 55 people that completed more than 25$\%$ of the project. During the classification task, we present to the participants 1489 images. The sample contains a variety of data including lens simulations, real lenses, non-lens examples, and unlabeled data. We find that experts are extremely good at finding bright, well-resolved Einstein rings, whilst arcs with $g$-band signal-to-noise less than $\sim$25 or Einstein radii less than $\sim$1.2 times the seeing are rarely recovered. Very few non-lenses are scored highly. There is substantial variation in the performance of individual classifiers, but they do not appear to depend on the classifier's experience, confidence or academic position. These variations can be mitigated with a team of 6 or more independent classifiers. Our results give confidence that humans are a reliable pruning step for lens candidates, providing pure and quantifiably complete samples for follow-up studies.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2023; v1 submitted 9 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
The Gravity Collective: A Search for the Electromagnetic Counterpart to the Neutron Star-Black Hole Merger GW190814
Authors:
Charles D. Kilpatrick,
David A. Coulter,
Iair Arcavi,
Thomas G. Brink,
Georgios Dimitriadis,
Alexei V. Filippenko,
Ryan J. Foley,
D. Andrew Howell,
David O. Jones,
Martin Makler,
Anthony L. Piro,
César Rojas-Bravo,
David J. Sand,
Jonathan J. Swift,
Douglas Tucker,
WeiKang Zheng,
Sahar S. Allam,
James T. Annis,
Juanita Antilen,
Tristan G. Bachmann,
Joshua S. Bloom,
Clecio R. Bom,
K. Azalee Bostroem,
Dillon Brout,
Jamison Burke
, et al. (57 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present optical follow-up imaging obtained with the Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope, Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network, Nickel Telescope, Swope Telescope, and Thacher Telescope of the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave (GW) signal from the neutron star-black hole (NSBH) merger GW190814. We searched the GW190814 localization region (19 deg$^{2}$ for the 90th percentile best localiz…
▽ More
We present optical follow-up imaging obtained with the Katzman Automatic Imaging Telescope, Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network, Nickel Telescope, Swope Telescope, and Thacher Telescope of the LIGO/Virgo gravitational wave (GW) signal from the neutron star-black hole (NSBH) merger GW190814. We searched the GW190814 localization region (19 deg$^{2}$ for the 90th percentile best localization), covering a total of 51 deg$^{2}$ and 94.6% of the two-dimensional localization region. Analyzing the properties of 189 transients that we consider as candidate counterparts to the NSBH merger, including their localizations, discovery times from merger, optical spectra, likely host-galaxy redshifts, and photometric evolution, we conclude that none of these objects are likely to be associated with GW190814. Based on this finding, we consider the likely optical properties of an electromagnetic counterpart to GW190814, including possible kilonovae and short gamma-ray burst afterglows. Using the joint limits from our follow-up imaging, we conclude that a counterpart with an $r$-band decline rate of 0.68 mag day$^{-1}$, similar to the kilonova AT 2017gfo, could peak at an absolute magnitude of at most $-17.8$ mag (50% confidence). Our data are not constraining for ''red'' kilonovae and rule out ''blue'' kilonovae with $M>0.5 M_{\odot}$ (30% confidence). We strongly rule out all known types of short gamma-ray burst afterglows with viewing angles $<$17$^{\circ}$ assuming an initial jet opening angle of $\sim$$5.2^{\circ}$ and explosion energies and circumburst densities similar to afterglows explored in the literature. Finally, we explore the possibility that GW190814 merged in the disk of an active galactic nucleus, of which we find four in the localization region, but we do not find any candidate counterparts among these sources.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
DESC DC2 Data Release Note
Authors:
LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration,
Bela Abolfathi,
Robert Armstrong,
Humna Awan,
Yadu N. Babuji,
Franz Erik Bauer,
George Beckett,
Rahul Biswas,
Joanne R. Bogart,
Dominique Boutigny,
Kyle Chard,
James Chiang,
Johann Cohen-Tanugi,
Andrew J. Connolly,
Scott F. Daniel,
Seth W. Digel,
Alex Drlica-Wagner,
Richard Dubois,
Eric Gawiser,
Thomas Glanzman,
Salman Habib,
Andrew P. Hearin,
Katrin Heitmann,
Fabio Hernandez,
Renée Hložek
, et al. (32 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In preparation for cosmological analyses of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (LSST DESC) has created a 300 deg$^2$ simulated survey as part of an effort called Data Challenge 2 (DC2). The DC2 simulated sky survey, in six optical bands with observations following a reference LSST observing cadence, was processed with th…
▽ More
In preparation for cosmological analyses of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (LSST DESC) has created a 300 deg$^2$ simulated survey as part of an effort called Data Challenge 2 (DC2). The DC2 simulated sky survey, in six optical bands with observations following a reference LSST observing cadence, was processed with the LSST Science Pipelines (19.0.0). In this Note, we describe the public data release of the resulting object catalogs for the coadded images of five years of simulated observations along with associated truth catalogs. We include a brief description of the major features of the available data sets. To enable convenient access to the data products, we have developed a web portal connected to Globus data services. We describe how to access the data and provide example Jupyter Notebooks in Python to aid first interactions with the data. We welcome feedback and questions about the data release via a GitHub repository.
△ Less
Submitted 13 June, 2022; v1 submitted 12 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
The LSST DESC DC2 Simulated Sky Survey
Authors:
LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration,
Bela Abolfathi,
David Alonso,
Robert Armstrong,
Éric Aubourg,
Humna Awan,
Yadu N. Babuji,
Franz Erik Bauer,
Rachel Bean,
George Beckett,
Rahul Biswas,
Joanne R. Bogart,
Dominique Boutigny,
Kyle Chard,
James Chiang,
Chuck F. Claver,
Johann Cohen-Tanugi,
Céline Combet,
Andrew J. Connolly,
Scott F. Daniel,
Seth W. Digel,
Alex Drlica-Wagner,
Richard Dubois,
Emmanuel Gangler,
Eric Gawiser
, et al. (55 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe the simulated sky survey underlying the second data challenge (DC2) carried out in preparation for analysis of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) by the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (LSST DESC). Significant connections across multiple science domains will be a hallmark of LSST; the DC2 program represents a unique modeling effort that stresses…
▽ More
We describe the simulated sky survey underlying the second data challenge (DC2) carried out in preparation for analysis of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) by the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (LSST DESC). Significant connections across multiple science domains will be a hallmark of LSST; the DC2 program represents a unique modeling effort that stresses this interconnectivity in a way that has not been attempted before. This effort encompasses a full end-to-end approach: starting from a large N-body simulation, through setting up LSST-like observations including realistic cadences, through image simulations, and finally processing with Rubin's LSST Science Pipelines. This last step ensures that we generate data products resembling those to be delivered by the Rubin Observatory as closely as is currently possible. The simulated DC2 sky survey covers six optical bands in a wide-fast-deep (WFD) area of approximately 300 deg^2 as well as a deep drilling field (DDF) of approximately 1 deg^2. We simulate 5 years of the planned 10-year survey. The DC2 sky survey has multiple purposes. First, the LSST DESC working groups can use the dataset to develop a range of DESC analysis pipelines to prepare for the advent of actual data. Second, it serves as a realistic testbed for the image processing software under development for LSST by the Rubin Observatory. In particular, simulated data provide a controlled way to investigate certain image-level systematic effects. Finally, the DC2 sky survey enables the exploration of new scientific ideas in both static and time-domain cosmology.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2021; v1 submitted 12 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
The LSST DESC Data Challenge 1: Generation and Analysis of Synthetic Images for Next Generation Surveys
Authors:
F. Javier Sánchez,
Chris W. Walter,
Humna Awan,
James Chiang,
Scott F. Daniel,
Eric Gawiser,
Tom Glanzman,
David P. Kirkby,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Anže Slosar,
W. Michael Wood-Vasey,
Yusra AlSayyad,
Colin J. Burke,
Seth W. Digel,
Mike Jarvis,
Tony Johnson,
Heather Kelly,
Simon Krughoff,
Robert H. Lupton,
Phil J. Marshall,
John R. Peterson,
Paul A. Price,
Glenn Sembroski,
Brian Van Klaveren,
Matthew P. Wiesner
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Data Challenge 1 (DC1) is the first synthetic dataset produced by the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC). DC1 is designed to develop and validate data reduction and analysis and to study the impact of systematic effects that will affect the LSST dataset. DC1 is comprised of $r$-band observations of 40 deg$^{2}$ to 10-year LSST depth. W…
▽ More
Data Challenge 1 (DC1) is the first synthetic dataset produced by the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC). DC1 is designed to develop and validate data reduction and analysis and to study the impact of systematic effects that will affect the LSST dataset. DC1 is comprised of $r$-band observations of 40 deg$^{2}$ to 10-year LSST depth. We present each stage of the simulation and analysis process: a) generation, by synthesizing sources from cosmological N-body simulations in individual sensor-visit images with different observing conditions; b) reduction using a development version of the LSST Science Pipelines; and c) matching to the input cosmological catalog for validation and testing. We verify that testable LSST requirements pass within the fidelity of DC1. We establish a selection procedure that produces a sufficiently clean extragalactic sample for clustering analyses and we discuss residual sample contamination, including contributions from inefficiency in star-galaxy separation and imperfect deblending. We compute the galaxy power spectrum on the simulated field and conclude that: i) survey properties have an impact of 50\% of the statistical uncertainty for the scales and models used in DC1 ii) a selection to eliminate artifacts in the catalogs is necessary to avoid biases in the measured clustering; iii) the presence of bright objects has a significant impact (2- to 6-$σ$) in the estimated power spectra at small scales ($\ell > 1200$), highlighting the impact of blending in studies at small angular scales in LSST;
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2020; v1 submitted 3 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Mass Calibration of Galaxy Clusters at Redshift 0.1-1.0 using Weak Lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 Co-add
Authors:
Matthew P. Wiesner,
Huan Lin,
Marcelle Soares-Santos
Abstract:
We present galaxy cluster mass-richness relations found in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 co-add using clusters found using a Voronoi tessellation cluster finder. These relations were found using stacked weak lensing shear observed in a large sample of galaxy clusters. These mass-richness relations are presented for four redshift bins, $0.1 < z \leq 0.4$, $0.4 < z \leq 0.7$,…
▽ More
We present galaxy cluster mass-richness relations found in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 co-add using clusters found using a Voronoi tessellation cluster finder. These relations were found using stacked weak lensing shear observed in a large sample of galaxy clusters. These mass-richness relations are presented for four redshift bins, $0.1 < z \leq 0.4$, $0.4 < z \leq 0.7$, $0.7 < z \leq 1.0$ and $0.1 < z \leq 1.0$. We describe the sample of galaxy clusters and explain how these clusters were found using a Voronoi tessellation cluster finder. We fit an NFW profile to the stacked weak lensing shear signal in redshift and richness bins in order to measure virial mass $(M_{200})$. We describe several effects that can bias weak lensing measurements, including photometric redshift bias, the effect of the central BCG, halo miscentering, photometric redshift uncertainty and foreground galaxy contamination. We present mass-richness relations using richness measure $N_{VT}$ with each of these effects considered separately as well as considered altogether. We also examine redshift evolution of the mass-richness relation. As a result we present measurements of the mass coefficient ($M_{200|20}$) and the power law slope ($α$) for power law fits to the mass and richness values in each of the redshift bins. We find values of the mass coefficient of $8.49 \pm 0.526$, $14.1 \pm 1.78$, $30.2 \pm 8.74$ and $9.23 \pm 0.525 \times 10^{13}$ $h^{-1}$ $M_{sun}$ for each of the four redshift bins respectively. We find values of the power law slope of $0.905 \pm 0.0585$, $0.948 \pm 0.100$, $1.33 \pm 0.260$ and $0.883 \pm 0.0500$ respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2015; v1 submitted 27 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
-
The Sloan Bright Arcs Survey: Ten Strong Gravitational Lensing Clusters and Evidence of Overconcentration
Authors:
Matthew P. Wiesner,
Huan Lin,
Sahar S. Allam,
James Annis,
Elizabeth J. Buckley-Geer,
H. Thomas Diehl,
Donna Kubik,
Jeffrey M. Kubo,
Douglas Tucker
Abstract:
We describe ten strong lensing galaxy clusters of redshift 0.26-0.56 that were found in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We present measurements of richness, mass and velocity dispersion for the clusters. We find that in order to use the mass-richness relation from Johnston et al. (2007), which was established at mean redshift of 0.25, it is necessary to scale measured richness values up by 1.47. We…
▽ More
We describe ten strong lensing galaxy clusters of redshift 0.26-0.56 that were found in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We present measurements of richness, mass and velocity dispersion for the clusters. We find that in order to use the mass-richness relation from Johnston et al. (2007), which was established at mean redshift of 0.25, it is necessary to scale measured richness values up by 1.47. We also present measurements of Einstein radius, mass and velocity dispersion for the lensing systems. The Einstein radii are all relatively small, between 5.4-13 arcseconds. Finally we consider if there is evidence that our clusters are more concentrated than standard cosmology would predict. We find that six of our clusters do not show evidence of overconcentration, while four of our clusters do. We note a correlation between overconcentration and mass, as the four clusters showing evidence of overconcentration are all lower-mass clusters.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
