Quantitatively rating galaxy simulations against real observations with anomaly detection
Authors:
Zehao Jin,
Andrea V. Macciò,
Nicholas Faucher,
Mario Pasquato,
Tobias Buck,
Keri L. Dixon,
Nikhil Arora,
Marvin Blank,
Pavle Vulanović
Abstract:
Cosmological galaxy formation simulations are powerful tools to understand the complex processes that govern the formation and evolution of galaxies. However, evaluating the realism of these simulations remains a challenge. The two common approaches for evaluating galaxy simulations is either through scaling relations based on a few key physical galaxy properties, or through a set of pre-defined m…
▽ More
Cosmological galaxy formation simulations are powerful tools to understand the complex processes that govern the formation and evolution of galaxies. However, evaluating the realism of these simulations remains a challenge. The two common approaches for evaluating galaxy simulations is either through scaling relations based on a few key physical galaxy properties, or through a set of pre-defined morphological parameters based on galaxy images. This paper proposes a novel image-based method for evaluating the quality of galaxy simulations using unsupervised deep learning anomaly detection techniques. By comparing full galaxy images, our approach can identify and quantify discrepancies between simulated and observed galaxies. As a demonstration, we apply this method to SDSS imaging and NIHAO simulations with different physics models, parameters, and resolution. We further compare the metric of our method to scaling relations as well as morphological parameters. We show that anomaly detection is able to capture similarities and differences between real and simulated objects that scaling relations and morphological parameters are unable to cover, thus indeed providing a new point of view to validate and calibrate cosmological simulations against observed data.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Using Artificial Intelligence and real galaxy images to constrain parameters in galaxy formation simulations
Authors:
Andrea V. Macciò,
Mohamad Ali-Dib,
Pavle Vulanović,
Hind Al Noori,
Fabian Walter,
Nico Krieger,
Tobias Buck
Abstract:
Cosmological galaxy formation simulations are still limited by their spatial/mass resolution and cannot model from first principles some of the processes, like star formation, that are key in driving galaxy evolution. As a consequence they still rely on a set of 'effective parameters' that try to capture the scales and the physical processes that cannot be directly resolved in the simulation. In t…
▽ More
Cosmological galaxy formation simulations are still limited by their spatial/mass resolution and cannot model from first principles some of the processes, like star formation, that are key in driving galaxy evolution. As a consequence they still rely on a set of 'effective parameters' that try to capture the scales and the physical processes that cannot be directly resolved in the simulation. In this study we show that it is possible to use Machine Learning techniques applied to real and simulated images of galaxies to discriminate between different values of these parameters by making use of the full information content of an astronomical image instead of collapsing it into a limited set of values like size, or stellar/ gas masses. In this work we apply our method to the NIHAO simulations and the THINGS and VLA-ANGST observations of HI maps in nearby galaxies to test the ability of different values of the star formation density threshold $n$ to reproduce observed HI maps. We show that observations indicate the need for a high value of $n \gtrsim 80$ ,cm$^{-3}$ (although the exact numerical value is model-dependent), which has important consequences for the dark matter distribution in galaxies. Our study shows that with innovative methods it is possible to take full advantage of the information content of galaxy images and compare simulations and observations in an interpretable, non-parametric and quantitative manner.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.