Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit
Authors:
O. Friedrich,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
O. Alves,
R. Rosenfeld,
J. Sanchez,
X. Fang,
T. F. Eifler,
E. Krause,
C. Chang,
Y. Omori,
A. Amon,
E. Baxter,
J. Elvin-Poole,
D. Huterer,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
V. Terra,
A. Troja,
A. Alarcon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. Buchs,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (87 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansatzes for covariance modelling and testing we validate the assumptions and approximations of this model. These include the assumption of a Gaussian likelihood, the trispectrum contribution to the covariance, the impact of…
▽ More
We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansatzes for covariance modelling and testing we validate the assumptions and approximations of this model. These include the assumption of a Gaussian likelihood, the trispectrum contribution to the covariance, the impact of evaluating the model at a wrong set of parameters, the impact of masking and survey geometry, deviations from Poissonian shot-noise, galaxy weighting schemes and other, sub-dominant effects. We find that our covariance model is robust and that its approximations have little impact on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimation. The largest impact on best-fit figure-of-merit arises from the so-called $f_{\mathrm{sky}}$ approximation for dealing with finite survey area, which on average increases the $χ^2$ between maximum posterior model and measurement by $3.7\%$ ($Δχ^2 \approx 18.9$). Standard methods to go beyond this approximation fail for DES-Y3, but we derive an approximate scheme to deal with these features. For parameter estimation, our ignorance of the exact parameters at which to evaluate our covariance model causes the dominant effect. We find that it increases the scatter of maximum posterior values for $Ω_m$ and $σ_8$ by about $3\%$ and for the dark energy equation of state parameter by about $5\%$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2021; v1 submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
