Constraining Type Iax Supernova Progenitor Systems with Stellar Population Aging
Authors:
Tyler Takaro,
Ryan J. Foley,
Curtis McCully,
Wen-fai Fong,
Saurabh W. Jha,
Gautham Narayan,
Armin Rest,
Maximilian Stritzinger,
Kevin McKinnon
Abstract:
Type Iax supernovae (SNe~Iax) are the most common class of peculiar SNe. While they are thought to be thermonuclear white-dwarf (WD) SNe, SNe~Iax are observationally similar to, but distinct from SNe~Ia. Unlike SNe~Ia, where roughly 30\% occur in early-type galaxies, only one SN~Iax has been discovered in an early-type galaxy, suggesting a relatively short delay time and a distinct progenitor syst…
▽ More
Type Iax supernovae (SNe~Iax) are the most common class of peculiar SNe. While they are thought to be thermonuclear white-dwarf (WD) SNe, SNe~Iax are observationally similar to, but distinct from SNe~Ia. Unlike SNe~Ia, where roughly 30\% occur in early-type galaxies, only one SN~Iax has been discovered in an early-type galaxy, suggesting a relatively short delay time and a distinct progenitor system. Furthermore, one SN~Iax progenitor system has been detected in pre-explosion images with its properties consistent with either of two models: a short-lived (<100 Myr) progenitor system consisting of a WD primary and a He-star companion, or a singular Wolf-Rayet progenitor star. Using deep \textit{Hubble Space Telescope} images of nine nearby SN~Iax host galaxies, we measure the properties of stars within 200 pc of the SN position. The ages of local stars, some of which formed with the SN progenitor system, can constrain the time between star formation and SN, known as the delay time. We compare the local stellar properties to synthetic photometry of single-stellar populations, fitting to a range of possible delay times for each SN. With this sample, we uniquely constrain the delay-time distribution for SNe~Iax, with a median and $1-σ$ confidence interval delay time of $63_{- 15}^{+ 58} \times 10^{6}$ years. The measured delay-time distribution provides an excellent constraint on the progenitor system for the class, indicating a preference for a WD progenitor system over a Wolf-Rayet progenitor star.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
A Potential Progenitor for the Type Ic Supernova 2017ein
Authors:
Charles D. Kilpatrick,
Tyler Takaro,
Ryan J. Foley,
Camille N. Leibler,
Yen-Chen Pan,
Randall D. Campbell,
Wynn V. Jacobson-Galan,
Hilton A. Lewis,
James E. Lyke,
Claire E. Max,
Sophia A. Medallon,
Armin Rest
Abstract:
We report the first detection of a credible progenitor system for a Type Ic supernova (SN Ic), SN 2017ein. We present spectra and photometry of the SN, finding it to be similar to carbon-rich, low-luminosity SNe Ic. Using a post-explosion Keck adaptive optics image, we precisely determine the position of SN 2017ein in pre-explosion \hst\ images, finding a single source coincident with the SN posit…
▽ More
We report the first detection of a credible progenitor system for a Type Ic supernova (SN Ic), SN 2017ein. We present spectra and photometry of the SN, finding it to be similar to carbon-rich, low-luminosity SNe Ic. Using a post-explosion Keck adaptive optics image, we precisely determine the position of SN 2017ein in pre-explosion \hst\ images, finding a single source coincident with the SN position. This source is marginally extended, and is consistent with being a stellar cluster. However, under the assumption that the emission of this source is dominated by a single point source, we perform point-spread function photometry, and correcting for line-of-sight reddening, we find it to have $M_{\rm F555W} = -7.5\pm0.2$ mag and $m_{\rm F555W}-m_{\rm F814W}$=$-0.67\pm0.14$ mag. This source is bluer than the main sequence and brighter than almost all Wolf-Rayet stars, however it is similar to some WC+O- and B-star binary systems. Under the assumption that the source is dominated by a single star, we find that it had an initial mass of $55\substack{+20-15} M_{\odot}$. We also examined binary star models to look for systems that match the overall photometry of the pre-explosion source and found that the best-fitting model is a $80$+$48 M_{\odot}$ close binary system in which the $80 M_{\odot}$ star is stripped and explodes as a lower mass star. Late-time photometry after the SN has faded will be necessary to cleanly separate the progenitor star emission from the additional coincident emission.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
