-
Cosmic dust fertilization of glacial prebiotic chemistry on early Earth
Authors:
Craig R. Walton,
Jessica K. Rigley,
Alexander Lipp,
Robert Law,
Martin D. Suttle,
Maria Schonbachler,
Mark Wyatt,
Oliver Shorttle
Abstract:
Earth's surface is deficient in available forms of many elements considered limiting for prebiotic chemistry. In contrast, many extraterrestrial rocky objects are rich in these same elements. Limiting prebiotic ingredients may, therefore, have been delivered by exogenous material; however, the mechanisms by which exogeneous material may be reliably and non-destructively supplied to a planetary sur…
▽ More
Earth's surface is deficient in available forms of many elements considered limiting for prebiotic chemistry. In contrast, many extraterrestrial rocky objects are rich in these same elements. Limiting prebiotic ingredients may, therefore, have been delivered by exogenous material; however, the mechanisms by which exogeneous material may be reliably and non-destructively supplied to a planetary surface remains unclear. Today, the flux of extraterrestrial matter to Earth is dominated by fine-grained cosmic dust. Although this material is rarely discussed in a prebiotic context due to its delivery over a large surface area, concentrated cosmic dust deposits are known to form on Earth today due to the action of sedimentary processes. Here we combine empirical constraints on dust sedimentation with dynamical simulations of dust formation and planetary accretion to show that localized sedimentary deposits of cosmic dust could have accumulated in arid environments on early Earth, in particular glacial settings that today produce cryoconite sediments. Our results challenge the widely held assumption that cosmic dust is incapable of fertilizing prebiotic chemistry. Cosmic dust deposits may have plausibly formed on early Earth and acted to fertilize prebiotic chemistry.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
The Winchcombe Fireball -- that Lucky Survivor
Authors:
Sarah McMullan,
Denis Vida,
Hadrien A. R. Devillepoix,
Jim Rowe,
Luke Daly,
Ashley J. King,
Martin Cupák,
Robert M. Howie,
Eleanor K. Sansom,
Patrick Shober,
Martin C. Towner,
Seamus Anderson,
Luke McFadden,
Jana Horák,
Andrew R. D. Smedley,
Katherine H. Joy,
Alan Shuttleworth,
Francois Colas,
Brigitte Zanda,
Áine C. O'Brien,
Ian McMullan,
Clive Shaw,
Adam Suttle,
Martin D. Suttle,
John S. Young
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
On February 28, 2021, a fireball dropped $\sim0.6$ kg of recovered CM2 carbonaceous chondrite meteorites in South-West England near the town of Winchcombe. We reconstruct the fireball's atmospheric trajectory, light curve, fragmentation behaviour, and pre-atmospheric orbit from optical records contributed by five networks. The progenitor meteoroid was three orders of magnitude less massive (…
▽ More
On February 28, 2021, a fireball dropped $\sim0.6$ kg of recovered CM2 carbonaceous chondrite meteorites in South-West England near the town of Winchcombe. We reconstruct the fireball's atmospheric trajectory, light curve, fragmentation behaviour, and pre-atmospheric orbit from optical records contributed by five networks. The progenitor meteoroid was three orders of magnitude less massive ($\sim13$ kg) than any previously observed carbonaceous fall. The Winchcombe meteorite survived entry because it was exposed to a very low peak atmospheric dynamic pressure ($\sim0.6$ MPa) due to a fortuitous combination of entry parameters, notably low velocity (13.9 km/s). A near-catastrophic fragmentation at $\sim0.07$ MPa points to the body's fragility. Low entry speeds which cause low peak dynamic pressures are likely necessary conditions for a small carbonaceous meteoroid to survive atmospheric entry, strongly constraining the radiant direction to the general antapex direction. Orbital integrations show that the meteoroid was injected into the near-Earth region $\sim0.08$ Myr ago and it never had a perihelion distance smaller than $\sim0.7$ AU, while other CM2 meteorites with known orbits approached the Sun closer ($\sim0.5$ AU) and were heated to at least 100 K higher temperatures.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2023; v1 submitted 21 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
A Global Fireball Observatory
Authors:
H. A. R. Devillepoix,
M. Cupák,
P. A. Bland,
E. K. Sansom,
M. C. Towner,
R. M. Howie,
B. A. D. Hartig,
T. Jansen-Sturgeon,
P. M. Shober,
S. L. Anderson,
G. K. Benedix,
D. Busan,
R. Sayers,
P. Jenniskens,
J. Albers,
C. D. K. Herd,
P. J. A. Hill,
P. G. Brown,
Z. Krzeminski,
G. R. Osinski,
H. Chennaoui Aoudjehane,
Z. Benkhaldoun,
A. Jabiri,
M. Guennoun,
A. Barka
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The world's meteorite collections contain a very rich picture of what the early Solar System would have been made of, however the lack of spatial context with respect to their parent population for these samples is an issue. The asteroid population is equally as rich in surface mineralogies, and mapping these two populations (meteorites and asteroids) together is a major challenge for planetary sc…
▽ More
The world's meteorite collections contain a very rich picture of what the early Solar System would have been made of, however the lack of spatial context with respect to their parent population for these samples is an issue. The asteroid population is equally as rich in surface mineralogies, and mapping these two populations (meteorites and asteroids) together is a major challenge for planetary science. Directly probing asteroids achieves this at a high cost. Observing meteorite falls and calculating their pre-atmospheric orbit on the other hand, is a cheaper way to approach the problem. The Global Fireball Observatory (GFO) collaboration was established in 2017 and brings together multiple institutions (from Australia, USA, Canada, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, the UK, and Argentina) to maximise the area for fireball observation time and therefore meteorite recoveries. The members have a choice to operate independently, but they can also choose to work in a fully collaborative manner with other GFO partners. This efficient approach leverages the experience gained from the Desert Fireball Network (DFN) pathfinder project in Australia. The state-of-the art technology (DFN camera systems and data reduction) and experience of the support teams is shared between all partners, freeing up time for science investigations and meteorite searching. With all networks combined together, the GFO collaboration already covers 0.6% of the Earth's surface for meteorite recovery as of mid-2019, and aims to reach 2% in the early 2020s. We estimate that after 5 years of operation, the GFO will have observed a fireball from virtually every meteorite type. This combined effort will bring new, fresh, extra-terrestrial material to the labs, yielding new insights about the formation of the Solar System.
△ Less
Submitted 12 June, 2020; v1 submitted 2 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
