Data-driven background model for the CUORE experiment
Authors:
CUORE Collaboration,
D. Q. Adams,
C. Alduino,
K. Alfonso,
F. T. Avignone III,
O. Azzolini,
G. Bari,
F. Bellini,
G. Benato,
M. Beretta,
M. Biassoni,
A. Branca,
C. Brofferio,
C. Bucci,
J. Camilleri,
A. Caminata,
A. Campani,
J. Cao,
S. Capelli,
C. Capelli,
L. Cappelli,
L. Cardani,
P. Carniti,
N. Casali,
E. Celi
, et al. (93 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the model we developed to reconstruct the CUORE radioactive background based on the analysis of an experimental exposure of 1038.4 kg yr. The data reconstruction relies on a simultaneous Bayesian fit applied to energy spectra over a broad energy range. The high granularity of the CUORE detector, together with the large exposure and extended stable operations, allow for an in-depth explo…
▽ More
We present the model we developed to reconstruct the CUORE radioactive background based on the analysis of an experimental exposure of 1038.4 kg yr. The data reconstruction relies on a simultaneous Bayesian fit applied to energy spectra over a broad energy range. The high granularity of the CUORE detector, together with the large exposure and extended stable operations, allow for an in-depth exploration of both spatial and time dependence of backgrounds. We achieve high sensitivity to both bulk and surface activities of the materials of the setup, detecting levels as low as 10 nBq kg$^{-1}$ and 0.1 nBq cm$^{-2}$, respectively. We compare the contamination levels we extract from the background model with prior radio-assay data, which informs future background risk mitigation strategies. The results of this background model play a crucial role in constructing the background budget for the CUPID experiment as it will exploit the same CUORE infrastructure.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
White Paper on Light Sterile Neutrino Searches and Related Phenomenology
Authors:
M. A. Acero,
C. A. Argüelles,
M. Hostert,
D. Kalra,
G. Karagiorgi,
K. J. Kelly,
B. Littlejohn,
P. Machado,
W. Pettus,
M. Toups,
M. Ross-Lonergan,
A. Sousa,
P. T. Surukuchi,
Y. Y. Y. Wong,
W. Abdallah,
A. M. Abdullahi,
R. Akutsu,
L. Alvarez-Ruso,
D. S. M. Alves,
A. Aurisano,
A. B. Balantekin,
J. M. Berryman,
T. Bertólez-Martínez,
J. Brunner,
M. Blennow
, et al. (147 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper provides a comprehensive review of our present understanding of experimental neutrino anomalies that remain unresolved, charting the progress achieved over the last decade at the experimental and phenomenological level, and sets the stage for future programmatic prospects in addressing those anomalies. It is purposed to serve as a guiding and motivational "encyclopedic" reference,…
▽ More
This white paper provides a comprehensive review of our present understanding of experimental neutrino anomalies that remain unresolved, charting the progress achieved over the last decade at the experimental and phenomenological level, and sets the stage for future programmatic prospects in addressing those anomalies. It is purposed to serve as a guiding and motivational "encyclopedic" reference, with emphasis on needs and options for future exploration that may lead to the ultimate resolution of the anomalies. We see the main experimental, analysis, and theory-driven thrusts that will be essential to achieving this goal being: 1) Cover all anomaly sectors -- given the unresolved nature of all four canonical anomalies, it is imperative to support all pillars of a diverse experimental portfolio, source, reactor, decay-at-rest, decay-in-flight, and other methods/sources, to provide complementary probes of and increased precision for new physics explanations; 2) Pursue diverse signatures -- it is imperative that experiments make design and analysis choices that maximize sensitivity to as broad an array of these potential new physics signatures as possible; 3) Deepen theoretical engagement -- priority in the theory community should be placed on development of standard and beyond standard models relevant to all four short-baseline anomalies and the development of tools for efficient tests of these models with existing and future experimental datasets; 4) Openly share data -- Fluid communication between the experimental and theory communities will be required, which implies that both experimental data releases and theoretical calculations should be publicly available; and 5) Apply robust analysis techniques -- Appropriate statistical treatment is crucial to assess the compatibility of data sets within the context of any given model.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
