-
Galaxy And Mass Assembly: A Comparison between Galaxy-Galaxy Lens Searches in KiDS/GAMA
Authors:
Shawn Knabel,
Rebecca L. Steele,
Benne W. Holwerda,
Joanna S. Bridge,
Alice Jacques,
Andrew Hopkins,
Steven P. Bamford,
Michael J. I. Brown,
Sarah Brough,
Lee S. Kelvin,
Maciej Bilicki,
John Kielkopf
Abstract:
Strong gravitational lenses are a rare and instructive type of astronomical object. Identification has long relied on serendipity, but different strategies -- such as mixed spectroscopy of multiple galaxies along the line of sight, machine learning algorithms, and citizen science -- have been employed to identify these objects as new imaging surveys become available.
We report on the comparison…
▽ More
Strong gravitational lenses are a rare and instructive type of astronomical object. Identification has long relied on serendipity, but different strategies -- such as mixed spectroscopy of multiple galaxies along the line of sight, machine learning algorithms, and citizen science -- have been employed to identify these objects as new imaging surveys become available.
We report on the comparison between spectroscopic, machine learning, and citizen science identification of galaxy-galaxy lens candidates from independently constructed lens catalogs in the common survey area of the equatorial fields of the GAMA survey. In these, we have the opportunity to compare high-completeness spectroscopic identifications against high-fidelity imaging from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS) used for both machine learning and citizen science lens searches.
We find that the three methods -- spectroscopy, machine learning, and citizen science -- identify 47, 47, and 13 candidates respectively in the 180 square degrees surveyed. These identifications barely overlap, with only two identified by both citizen science and machine learning. We have traced this discrepancy to inherent differences in the selection functions of each of the three methods, either within their parent samples (i.e. citizen science focuses on low-redshift) or inherent to the method (i.e. machine learning is limited by its training sample and prefers well-separated features, while spectroscopy requires sufficient flux from lensed features to lie within the fiber). These differences manifest as separate samples in estimated Einstein radius, lens stellar mass, and lens redshift. The combined sample implies a lens candidate sky-density $\sim0.59$ deg$^{-2}$ and can inform the construction of a training set spanning a wider mass-redshift space.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
The Sizes of $z\sim9-10$ Galaxies Identified in the BoRG Survey
Authors:
Benne W. Holwerda,
Joanna S. Bridge,
Rebecca L. Steele,
Samir Kusmic,
Larry Bradley,
Rachael Livermore,
Stephanie Bernard,
Alice Jacques
Abstract:
Redshift $z=9--10$ object selection is the effective limit of Hubble Space Telescope imaging capability, even when confirmed with Spitzer. If only a few photometry data points are available, it becomes attractive to add criteria based on their morphology in these J- and H-band images.
One could do so through visual inspection, a size criterion, or alternate morphometrics. We explore a vetted sam…
▽ More
Redshift $z=9--10$ object selection is the effective limit of Hubble Space Telescope imaging capability, even when confirmed with Spitzer. If only a few photometry data points are available, it becomes attractive to add criteria based on their morphology in these J- and H-band images.
One could do so through visual inspection, a size criterion, or alternate morphometrics. We explore a vetted sample of BoRG $z\sim9$ and $z\sim10$ candidate galaxies and the object rejected by Morishita+ (2018) to explore the utility of a size criterion in z=9-10 candidate selection. A stringent, PSF-corrected effective radius criterion ($r_e<0\farcs3$) would result in the rejection of 65-70\% of the interlopers visually rejected by Morishita+. It may also remove up to $\sim20$\% of bona-fide brightest ($L>>L^*$) z=9 or 10 candidates from a BoRG selected sample based on the Mason+ (2015) luminosity functions, assuming the Holwerda+ (2015) $z\sim9$ size-luminosity relation. We argue that including a size constraint in lieu of a visual inspection may serve in wide-field searches for these objects in e.g. EUCLID or HST archival imaging with the understanding that some brightest ($L>>L^*$) candidates may be missed.
The sizes of the candidates found by Morishita+ (2018) follow the expected size distribution of $z\sim9$ for bright galaxies, consistent with the lognormal in Shibuya+ (2015) and single objects. Two candidates show high star-formation surface density ($Σ_{SFR} > 25 M_\odot/kpc^2$) and all merit further investigation and follow-up observations.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
The Super Eight Galaxies: Properties of a Sample of Very Bright Galaxies at $7 < z < 8$
Authors:
Joanna S. Bridge,
Benne W. Holwerda,
Mauro Stefanon,
Rychard J. Bouwens,
Pascal A. Oesch,
Michele Trenti,
Stephanie R. Bernard,
Larry D. Bradley,
Garth D. Illingworth,
Samir Kusmic,
Dan Magee,
Takahiro Morishita,
Guido W. Roberts-Borsani,
Renske Smit,
Rebecca L. Steele
Abstract:
We present the Super Eight galaxies - a set of very luminous, high-redshift ($7.1<z<8.0$) galaxy candidates found in Brightest of Reionizing Galaxies (BoRG) Survey fields. The original sample includes eight galaxies that are $Y$-band dropout objects with $H$-band magnitudes of $m_H<25.5$. Four of these objects were originally reported in Calvi et al. 2016. Combining new Hubble Space Telescope (HST…
▽ More
We present the Super Eight galaxies - a set of very luminous, high-redshift ($7.1<z<8.0$) galaxy candidates found in Brightest of Reionizing Galaxies (BoRG) Survey fields. The original sample includes eight galaxies that are $Y$-band dropout objects with $H$-band magnitudes of $m_H<25.5$. Four of these objects were originally reported in Calvi et al. 2016. Combining new Hubble Space Telescope (HST) WFC3/F814W imaging and $Spitzer$ IRAC data with archival imaging from BoRG and other surveys, we explore the properties of these galaxies. Photometric redshift fitting places six of these galaxies in the redshift range of $7.1<z<8.0$, resulting in three new high-redshift galaxies and confirming three of the four high-redshift galaxy candidates from Calvi et al. 2016. We calculate the half-light radii of the Super Eight galaxies using the HST F160W filter and find that the Super Eight sizes are in line with typical evolution of size with redshift. The Super Eights have a mean mass of log(M$_*$/M$_\odot$) $\sim10$, which is typical for sources in this luminosity range. Finally, we place our sample on the UV $z\sim8$ luminosity function and find that the Super Eight number density is consistent with other surveys in this magnitude and redshift range.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
