-
A Search for High-Energy Counterparts to Fast Radio Bursts
Authors:
Virginia Cunningham,
S. Bradley Cenko,
Eric Burns,
Adam Goldstein,
Amy Lien,
Daniel Kocevski,
Michael Briggs,
Valerie Connaughton,
M. Coleman Miller,
Judith Racusin,
Matthew Stanbro
Abstract:
We report on a search for high-energy counterparts to fast radio bursts (FRBs) with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT), and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). We find no significant associations for any of the 23 FRBs in our sample, but report upper limits to the high-energy fluence for each on timescales of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 s.…
▽ More
We report on a search for high-energy counterparts to fast radio bursts (FRBs) with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT), and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). We find no significant associations for any of the 23 FRBs in our sample, but report upper limits to the high-energy fluence for each on timescales of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 s. We report lower limits on the ratio of the radio to high-energy fluence, $\frac{f_{r}}{f_γ}$, for timescales of 0.1 and 100 s. We discuss the implications of our non-detections on various proposed progenitor models for FRBs, including analogs of giant pulses from the Crab pulsar and hyperflares from magnetars. This work demonstrates the utility of analyses of high-energy data for FRBs in tracking down the nature of these elusive sources.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Fermi GBM Observations of GRB 150101B: A Second Nearby Event with a Short Hard Spike and a Soft Tail
Authors:
E. Burns,
P. Veres,
V. Connaughton,
J. Racusin,
M. S. Briggs,
N. Christensen,
A. Goldstein,
R. Hamburg,
D. Kocevski,
J. McEnery,
E. Bissaldi,
T. Dal Canton,
W. H. Cleveland,
M. H. Gibby,
C. M. Hui,
A. von Kienlin,
B. Mailyan,
W. S. Paciesas,
O. J. Roberts,
K. Siellez,
M. Stanbro,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge
Abstract:
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent two-component nature is…
▽ More
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent two-component nature is phenomenologically similar to that of GRB 170817A. While GRB 170817A was distinct from the previously known population of short gamma-ray bursts in terms of its prompt intrinsic energetics, GRB 150101B is not. Despite these differences, GRB 150101B can be modeled as a more on-axis version of GRB 170817A. Identifying a similar signature in two of the closest short gamma-ray bursts suggests the soft tail is common, but generally undetectable in more distant events. If so, it will be possible to identify nearby short gamma-ray bursts from the prompt gamma-ray emission alone, aiding the search for kilonovae.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2018; v1 submitted 8 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
On the interpretation of the Fermi GBM transient observed in coincidence with LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Authors:
V. Connaughton,
E. Burns,
A. Goldstein,
L. Blackburn,
M. S. Briggs,
N. Christensen,
C. M. Hui,
D. Kocevski,
T. Littenberg,
J. E. McEnery,
J. Racusin,
P. Shawhan,
J. Veitch,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
P. N. Bhat,
E. Bissaldi,
W. Cleveland,
M. M. Giles,
M. H. Gibby,
A. von Kienlin,
R. M. Kippen,
S. McBreen,
C. A. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas,
R. D. Preece
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The weak transient detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 s after GW150914 has generated much speculation regarding its possible association with the black-hole binary merger. Investigation of the GBM data by Connaughton et al. (2016) revealed a source location consistent with GW150914 and a spectrum consistent with a weak, short Gamma-Ray Burst.
Greiner et al. (2016) present an…
▽ More
The weak transient detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 s after GW150914 has generated much speculation regarding its possible association with the black-hole binary merger. Investigation of the GBM data by Connaughton et al. (2016) revealed a source location consistent with GW150914 and a spectrum consistent with a weak, short Gamma-Ray Burst.
Greiner et al. (2016) present an alternative technique for fitting background-limited data in the low-count regime, and call into question the spectral analysis and the significance of the detection of GW150914-GBM presented in Connaughton et al. (2016). The spectral analysis of Connaughton et al. (2016) is not subject to the limitations of the low-count regime noted by Greiner et al. (2016). We find Greiner et al. (2016) used an inconsistent source position and did not follow the steps taken in Connaughton et al. (2016) to mitigate the statistical shortcomings of their software when analyzing this weak event. We use the approach of Greiner et al. (2016) to verify that our original spectral analysis is not biased.
The detection significance of GW150914-GBM is established empirically, with a False Alarm Rate (FAR) of $\sim 10^{-4}$~Hz. A post-trials False Alarm Probability (FAP) of $2.2 \times 10^{-3}$ ($2.9 σ$) of this transient being associated with GW150914 is based on the proximity in time to the GW event of a transient with that FAR. The FAR and the FAP are unaffected by the spectral analysis that is the focus of Greiner et al. (2016).
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A
Authors:
A. Goldstein,
P. Veres,
E. Burns,
M. S. Briggs,
R. Hamburg,
D. Kocevski,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
R. D. Preece,
S. Poolakkil,
O. J. Roberts,
C. M. Hui,
V. Connaughton,
J. Racusin,
A. von Kienlin,
T. Dal Canton,
N. Christensen,
T. B. Littenberg,
K. Siellez,
L. Blackburn,
J. Broida,
E. Bissaldi,
W. H. Cleveland,
M. H. Gibby,
M. M. Giles,
R. M. Kippen
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately 1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of gravitational waves and electr…
▽ More
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately 1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from a single astrophysical source and marks the start of gravitational-wave multi-messenger astronomy. We report the GBM observations and analysis of this ordinary short GRB, which extraordinarily confirms that at least some short GRBs are produced by binary compact mergers.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Searching the Gamma-ray Sky for Counterparts to Gravitational Wave Sources: Fermi GBM and LAT Observations of LVT151012 and GW151226
Authors:
J. L. Racusin,
E. Burns,
A. Goldstein,
V. Connaughton,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
P. Jenke,
L. Blackburn,
M. S. Briggs,
J. Broida,
J. Camp,
N. Christensen,
C. M. Hui,
T. Littenberg,
P. Shawhan,
L. Singer,
J. Veitch,
P. N. Bhat,
W. Cleveland,
G. Fitzpatrick,
M. H. Gibby,
A. von Kienlin,
S. McBreen,
B. Mailyan,
C. A. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope (LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated pipelines and new techn…
▽ More
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope (LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated pipelines and new techniques for char- acterizing the upper limits across a large area of the sky. Due to the partial GBM and LAT coverage of the large LIGO localization regions at the trigger times for both events, dif- ferences in source distances and masses, as well as the uncertain degree to which emission from these sources could be beamed, these non-detections cannot be used to constrain the variety of theoretical models recently applied to explain the candidate GBM counterpart to GW150914.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Supplement: Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the dif…
▽ More
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the different bands.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
The 3rd Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Six Years
Authors:
P. Narayana Bhat,
Charles A. Meegan,
Andreas von Kienlin,
William S. Paciesas,
Michael S. Briggs,
J. Michael Burgess,
Eric Burns,
Vandiver Chaplin,
William H. Cleveland,
Andrew C. Collazzi,
Valerie Connaughto,
Anne M. Diekmann,
Gerard Fitzpatrick,
Melissa H. Gibby,
Misty M. Giles,
Adam M. Goldstein,
Jochen Greiner,
Peter A. Jenke,
R. Marc Kippen,
Chryssa Kouveliotou,
Bagrat Mailyan,
Sheila McBreen,
Veronique Pelassa,
Robert D. Preece,
Oliver J. Roberts
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Since its launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has triggered and located on average approximately two gamma-ray bursts (GRB) every three days. Here we present the third of a series of catalogs of GRBs detected by GBM, extending the second catalog by two more years, through the middle of July 2014. The resulting list includes 1405 triggers identified as GRBs. The intention of the…
▽ More
Since its launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has triggered and located on average approximately two gamma-ray bursts (GRB) every three days. Here we present the third of a series of catalogs of GRBs detected by GBM, extending the second catalog by two more years, through the middle of July 2014. The resulting list includes 1405 triggers identified as GRBs. The intention of the GBM GRB catalog is to provide information to the community on the most important observables of the GBM detected GRBs. For each GRB the location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak flux and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the 50-300~keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the instrument reference system is observed, and also for a broader energy band from 10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy NaI(Tl) detectors. Using statistical methods to assess clustering, we find that the hardness and duration of GRBs are better fitted by a two-component model with short-hard and long-soft bursts, than by a model with three components. Furthermore, information is provided on the settings and modifications of the triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions during years five and six in the mission. This third catalog is an official product of the Fermi GBM science team, and the data files containing the complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Which $E_{\rm peak}$? - The Characteristic Energy of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra
Authors:
Robert Preece,
Adam Goldstein,
Narayana Bhat,
Matthew Stanbro,
Jon Hakkila,
Dylan Blalock
Abstract:
A characteristic energy of individual gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra can in most cases be determined from the peak energy of the energy density spectra ($ν{\cal F}_ν$), called '$E_{\rm peak}$'. Distributions of $E_{\rm peak}$ have been compiled for time-resolved spectra from bright GRBs, and also time-averaged spectra and peak flux spectra for nearly every burst observed by CGRO-BATSE and Fermi-GBM…
▽ More
A characteristic energy of individual gamma-ray burst (GRB) spectra can in most cases be determined from the peak energy of the energy density spectra ($ν{\cal F}_ν$), called '$E_{\rm peak}$'. Distributions of $E_{\rm peak}$ have been compiled for time-resolved spectra from bright GRBs, and also time-averaged spectra and peak flux spectra for nearly every burst observed by CGRO-BATSE and Fermi-GBM. Even when determined by an instrument with a broad energy band, such as GBM (8 keV to 40 MeV), the distributions themselves peak at around 240 keV in the observer's frame, with a spread of roughly a decade in energy. $E_{\rm peak}$ can have considerable evolution (sometimes greater than one decade) within any given burst, as amply demonstrated by single pulses in GRB110721A and GRB130427A. Meanwhile, several luminosity or energy relations have been proposed to correlate with either the time-integrated or peak flux $E_{\rm peak}$. Thus, when discussing correlations with $E_{\rm peak}$, the question arises, "Which $E_{\rm peak}$?". A single burst may be characterized by any one of a number of values for $E_{\rm peak}$ that are associated with it. Using a single pulse simulation model with spectral evolution as a proxy for the type of spectral evolution observed in many bursts, we investigate how the time-averaged $E_{\rm peak}$ emerges from the spectral evolution within a single pulse, how this average naturally correlates with the peak flux derived $E_{\rm peak}$ in a burst and how the distribution in $E_{\rm peak}$ values from many bursts derives its surprisingly narrow width.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2016; v1 submitted 9 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared wit…
▽ More
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared with 63 teams of observers covering radio, optical, near-infrared, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths with ground- and space-based facilities. In this Letter we describe the low-latency analysis of the GW data and present the sky localization of the first observed compact binary merger. We summarize the follow-up observations reported by 25 teams via private Gamma-ray Coordinates Network circulars, giving an overview of the participating facilities, the GW sky localization coverage, the timeline and depth of the observations. As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic (EM) signature. Nevertheless, this first broadband campaign to search for a counterpart of an Advanced LIGO source represents a milestone and highlights the broad capabilities of the transient astronomy community and the observing strategies that have been developed to pursue neutron star binary merger events. Detailed investigations of the EM data and results of the EM follow-up campaign are being disseminated in papers by the individual teams.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Fermi GBM Observations of LIGO Gravitational Wave event GW150914
Authors:
V. Connaughton,
E. Burns,
A. Goldstein,
L. Blackburn,
M. S. Briggs,
B. -B. Zhang,
J. Camp,
N. Christensen,
C. M. Hui,
P. Jenke,
T. Littenberg,
J. E. McEnery,
J. Racusin,
P. Shawhan,
L. Singer,
J. Veitch,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
P. N. Bhat,
E. Bissaldi,
W. Cleveland,
G. Fitzpatrick,
M. M. Giles,
M. H. Gibby,
A. von Kienlin,
R. M. Kippen
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914 reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event, with a false alarm…
▽ More
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914 reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event, with a false alarm probability of 0.0022 (2.9$σ$). This weak transient lasting 1 s was not detected by any other instrument and does not appear connected with other previously known astrophysical, solar, terrestrial, or magnetospheric activity. Its localization is ill-constrained but consistent with the direction of GW150914. The duration and spectrum of the transient event are consistent with a weak short Gamma-Ray Burst arriving at a large angle to the direction in which Fermi was pointing, where the GBM detector response is not optimal. If the GBM transient is associated with GW150914, this electromagnetic signal from a stellar mass black hole binary merger is unexpected. We calculate a luminosity in hard X-ray emission between 1~keV and 10~MeV of $1.8^{+1.5}_{-1.0} \times 10^{49}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. Future joint observations of GW events by LIGO/Virgo and Fermi GBM could reveal whether the weak transient reported here is a plausible counterpart to GW150914 or a chance coincidence, and will further probe the connection between compact binary mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2016; v1 submitted 11 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Compton scattering in terrestrial gamma-ray flashes detected with the Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor
Authors:
Gerard Fitzpatrick,
Eric Cramer,
Sheila McBreen,
Michael S. Briggs,
Suzanne Foley,
David Tierney,
Vandiver L. Chaplin,
Valerie Connaughton,
Matthew Stanbro,
Shaolin Xiong,
Joseph Dwyer,
Gerald J. Fishman,
Oliver J. Roberts,
Andreas von Kienlin
Abstract:
Terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) are short intense flashes of gamma rays associated with lightning activity in thunderstorms. Using Monte Carlo simulations of the relativistic runaway electron avalanche (RREA) process, theoretical predictions for the temporal and spectral evolution of TGFs are compared to observations made with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board the Fermi Gamma-ray Spa…
▽ More
Terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) are short intense flashes of gamma rays associated with lightning activity in thunderstorms. Using Monte Carlo simulations of the relativistic runaway electron avalanche (RREA) process, theoretical predictions for the temporal and spectral evolution of TGFs are compared to observations made with the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on board the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. Assuming a single source altitude of 15 km, a comparison of simulations to data is performed for a range of empirically chosen source electron variation time scales. The data exhibit a clear softening with increased source distance, in qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions. The simulated spectra follow this trend in the data, but tend to underestimate the observed hardness. Such a discrepancy may imply that the basic RREA model is not sufficient. Alternatively, a TGF beam that is tilted with respect to the zenith could produce an evolution with source distance that is compatible with the data. Based on these results, we propose that the source electron distributions of TGFs observed by GBM vary on time scales of at least tens of microseconds, with an upper limit of approx. 100 microseconds.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
