Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Spence, H

Reimagining Heliophysics: A bold new vision for the next decade and beyond

Authors: Ian J. Cohen, Dan Baker, Jacob Bortnik, Pontus Brandt, Jim Burch, Amir Caspi, George Clark, Ofer Cohen, Craig DeForest, Gordon Emslie, Matina Gkioulidou, Alexa Halford, Aleida Higginson, Allison Jaynes, Kristopher Klein, Craig Kletzing, Ryan McGranaghan, David Miles, Romina Nikoukar, Katariina Nykyrii, Larry Paxton, Louise Prockter, Harlan Spence, William H. Swartz, Drew L. Turner , et al. (3 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The field of Heliophysics has a branding problem. We need an answer to the question: ``What is Heliophysics\?'', the answer to which should clearly and succinctly defines our science in a compelling way that simultaneously introduces a sense of wonder and exploration into our science and our missions. Unfortunately, recent over-reliance on space weather to define our field, as opposed to simply us… ▽ More The field of Heliophysics has a branding problem. We need an answer to the question: ``What is Heliophysics\?'', the answer to which should clearly and succinctly defines our science in a compelling way that simultaneously introduces a sense of wonder and exploration into our science and our missions. Unfortunately, recent over-reliance on space weather to define our field, as opposed to simply using it as a practical and relatable example of applied Heliophysics science, narrows the scope of what solar and space physics is and diminishes its fundamental importance. Moving forward, our community needs to be bold and unabashed in our definition of Heliophysics and its big questions. We should emphasize the general and fundamental importance and excitement of our science with a new mindset that generalizes and expands the definition of Heliophysics to include new ``frontiers'' of increasing interest to the community. Heliophysics should be unbound from its current confinement to the Sun-Earth connection and expanded to studies of the fundamental nature of space plasma physics across the solar system and greater cosmos. Finally, we need to come together as a community to advance our science by envisioning, prioritizing, and supporting -- with a unified voice -- a set of bold new missions that target compelling science questions - even if they do not explore the traditional Sun- and Earth-centric aspects of Heliophysics science. Such new, large missions to expand the frontiers and scope of Heliophysics science large missions can be the key to galvanizing the public and policymakers to support the overall Heliophysics program. △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Journal ref: Bulletin of the AAS, Vol. 55, Issue 3, Whitepaper #071 (6pp); 2023 July 31

HelioSwarm: A Multipoint, Multiscale Mission to Characterize Turbulence

Authors: Kristopher G. Klein, Harlan Spence, Olga Alexandrova, Matthew Argall, Lev Arzamasskiy, Jay Bookbinder, Theodore Broeren, Damiano Caprioli, Anthony Case, Benjamin Chandran, Li-Jen Chen, Ivan Dors, Jonathan Eastwood, Colin Forsyth, Antoinette Galvin, Vincent Genot, Jasper Halekas, Michael Hesse, Butler Hine, Tim Horbury, Lan Jian, Justin Kasper, Matthieu Kretzschmar, Matthew Kunz, Benoit Lavraud , et al. (25 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: HelioSwarm (HS) is a NASA Medium-Class Explorer mission of the Heliophysics Division designed to explore the dynamic three-dimensional mechanisms controlling the physics of plasma turbulence, a ubiquitous process occurring in the heliosphere and in plasmas throughout the universe. This will be accomplished by making simultaneous measurements at nine spacecraft with separations spanning magnetohydr… ▽ More HelioSwarm (HS) is a NASA Medium-Class Explorer mission of the Heliophysics Division designed to explore the dynamic three-dimensional mechanisms controlling the physics of plasma turbulence, a ubiquitous process occurring in the heliosphere and in plasmas throughout the universe. This will be accomplished by making simultaneous measurements at nine spacecraft with separations spanning magnetohydrodynamic and sub-ion spatial scales in a variety of near-Earth plasmas. In this paper, we describe the scientific background for the HS investigation, the mission goals and objectives, the observatory reference trajectory and instrumentation implementation before the start of Phase B. Through multipoint, multiscale measurements, HS promises to reveal how energy is transferred across scales and boundaries in plasmas throughout the universe. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: Submitted to Space Science Reviews, 60 pages, 15 figures, 2 videos

Small Platforms, High Return: The Need to Enhance Investment in Small Satellites for Focused Science, Career Development, and Improved Equity

Authors: James Paul Mason, Robert G. Begbie, Maitland Bowen, Amir Caspi, Phillip C. Chamberlin, Amal Chandran, Ian Cohen, Edward E. DeLuca, Alfred G. de Wijn, Karin Dissauer, Francis Eparvier, Rachael Filwett, Sarah Gibson, Chris R. Gilly, Vicki Herde, George Ho, George Hospodarsky, Allison Jaynes, Andrew R. Jones, Justin C. Kasper, Rick Kohnert, Zoe Lee, E. I. Mason, Aimee Merkel, Rafael Mesquita , et al. (11 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: In the next decade, there is an opportunity for very high return on investment of relatively small budgets by elevating the priority of smallsat funding in heliophysics. We've learned in the past decade that these missions perform exceptionally well by traditional metrics, e.g., papers/year/\$M (Spence et al. 2022 -- arXiv:2206.02968). It is also well established that there is a "leaky pipeline" r… ▽ More In the next decade, there is an opportunity for very high return on investment of relatively small budgets by elevating the priority of smallsat funding in heliophysics. We've learned in the past decade that these missions perform exceptionally well by traditional metrics, e.g., papers/year/\$M (Spence et al. 2022 -- arXiv:2206.02968). It is also well established that there is a "leaky pipeline" resulting in too little diversity in leadership positions (see the National Academies Report at https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/increasing-diversity-in-the-leadership-of-competed-space-missions). Prioritizing smallsat funding would significantly increase the number of opportunities for new leaders to learn -- a crucial patch for the pipeline and an essential phase of career development. At present, however, there are far more proposers than the available funding can support, leading to selection ratios that can be as low as 6% -- in the bottom 0.5th percentile of selection ratios across the history of ROSES. Prioritizing SmallSat funding and substantially increasing that selection ratio are the fundamental recommendations being made by this white paper. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: White paper submitted to the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033; 6 pages, 1 figure

Journal ref: Bulletin of the AAS, Vol. 55, Issue 3, Whitepaper #268 (6pp); 2023 July 31

The essential role of multi-point measurements in investigations of turbulence, three-dimensional structure, and dynamics: the solar wind beyond single scale and the Taylor Hypothesis

Authors: W. H. Matthaeus, S. Adhikari, R. Bandyopadhyay, M. R. Brown, R. Bruno, J. Borovsky, V. Carbone, D. Caprioli, A. Chasapis, R. Chhiber, S. Dasso, P. Dmitruk, L. Del Zanna, P. A. Dmitruk, Luca Franci, S. P. Gary, M. L. Goldstein, D. Gomez, A. Greco, T. S. Horbury, Hantao Ji, J. C. Kasper, K. G. Klein, S. Landi, Hui Li , et al. (27 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Space plasmas are three-dimensional dynamic entities. Except under very special circumstances, their structure in space and their behavior in time are not related in any simple way. Therefore, single spacecraft in situ measurements cannot unambiguously unravel the full space-time structure of the heliospheric plasmas of interest in the inner heliosphere, in the Geospace environment, or the outer h… ▽ More Space plasmas are three-dimensional dynamic entities. Except under very special circumstances, their structure in space and their behavior in time are not related in any simple way. Therefore, single spacecraft in situ measurements cannot unambiguously unravel the full space-time structure of the heliospheric plasmas of interest in the inner heliosphere, in the Geospace environment, or the outer heliosphere. This shortcoming leaves numerous central questions incompletely answered. Deficiencies remain in at least two important subjects, Space Weather and fundamental plasma turbulence theory, due to a lack of a more complete understanding of the space-time structure of dynamic plasmas. Only with multispacecraft measurements over suitable spans of spatial separation and temporal duration can these ambiguities be resolved. We note that these characterizations apply to turbulence across a wide range of scales, and also equally well to shocks, flux ropes, magnetic clouds, current sheets, stream interactions, etc. In the following, we will describe the basic requirements for resolving space-time structure in general, using turbulence' as both an example and a principal target or study. Several types of missions are suggested to resolve space-time structure throughout the Heliosphere. △ Less

Submitted 26 November, 2022; v1 submitted 22 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: White Paper submitted to: Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1903.06890

Achievements and Lessons Learned from Successful Small Satellite Missions for Space Weather-Oriented Research

Authors: Harlan E. Spence, Amir Caspi, Hasan Bahcivan, Jesus Nieves-Chinchilla, Geoff Crowley, James Cutler, Chad Fish, David Jackson, Therese Moretto Jørgensen, David Klumpar, Xinlin Li, James P. Mason, Nick Paschalidis, John Sample, Sonya Smith, Charles M. Swenson, Thomas N. Woods

Abstract: When the first CubeSats were launched nearly two decades ago, few people believed that the miniature satellites would likely prove to be a useful scientific tool. Skeptics abounded. However, the last decade has seen the highly successful implementation of space missions that make creative and innovative use of fast-advancing CubeSat and small satellite technology to carry out important science exp… ▽ More When the first CubeSats were launched nearly two decades ago, few people believed that the miniature satellites would likely prove to be a useful scientific tool. Skeptics abounded. However, the last decade has seen the highly successful implementation of space missions that make creative and innovative use of fast-advancing CubeSat and small satellite technology to carry out important science experiments and missions. Several projects now have used CubeSats to obtain first-of-their-kind observations and findings that have formed the basis for high-profile engineering and science publications, thereby establishing without doubt the scientific value and broad utility of CubeSats. In this paper, we describe recent achievements and lessons learned from a representative selection of successful CubeSat missions with a space weather focus. We conclude that these missions were successful in part because their limited resources promoted not only mission focus but also appropriate risk-taking for comparatively high science return. Quantitative analysis of refereed publications from these CubeSat missions and several larger missions reveals that mission outcome metrics compare favorably when publication number is normalized by mission cost or if expressed as a weighted net scientific impact of all mission publications. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: 35 pages, 5 figures, 1 table; accepted for publication by Space Weather Journal

Journal ref: Space Weather, Vol. 20, Issue 7, e2021SW003031 (21pp); 2022 June 28

[Plasma 2020 Decadal] The essential role of multi-point measurements in turbulence investigations: the solar wind beyond single scale and beyond the Taylor Hypothesis

Authors: W. H. Matthaeus, R. Bandyopadhyay, M. R. Brown, J. Borovsky, V. Carbone, D. Caprioli, A. Chasapis, R. Chhiber, S. Dasso, P. Dmitruk, L. Del Zanna, P. A. Dmitruk, Luca Franci, S. P. Gary, M. L. Goldstein, D. Gomez, A. Greco, T. S. Horbury, Hantao Ji, J. C. Kasper, K. G. Klein, S. Landi, Hui Li, F. Malara, B. A. Maruca , et al. (24 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This paper briefly reviews a number of fundamental measurements that need to be made in order to characterize turbulence in space plasmas such as the solar wind. It has long been known that many of these quantities require simultaneous multipoint measurements to attain a proper characterization that would reveal the fundamental physics of plasma turbulence. The solar wind is an ideal plasma for su… ▽ More This paper briefly reviews a number of fundamental measurements that need to be made in order to characterize turbulence in space plasmas such as the solar wind. It has long been known that many of these quantities require simultaneous multipoint measurements to attain a proper characterization that would reveal the fundamental physics of plasma turbulence. The solar wind is an ideal plasma for such an investigation, and it now appears to be technologically feasible to carry out such an investigation, following the pioneering Cluster and MMS missions. Quantities that need to be measured using multipoint measurements include the two-point, two-time second correlation function of velocity, magnetic field and density, and higher order statistical objects such as third and fourth order structure functions. Some details of these requirements are given here, with a eye towards achieving closure on fundamental questions regarding the cascade rate, spectral anisotropy, characteristic coherent structures, intermittency, and dissipation mechanisms that describe plasma turbuelence, as well as its variability with plasma parameters in the solar wind. The motivation for this discussion is the current planning for a proposed Helioswarm mission that would be designed to make these measurements,leading to breakthrough understanding of the physics of space and astrophysical turbulence. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: White paper submitted to the PLASMA 2020 Decadal Survey Committee

[Plasma 2020 Decadal] Multipoint Measurements of the Solar Wind: A Proposed Advance for Studying Magnetized Turbulence

Authors: K. G. Klein, O. Alexandrova, J. Bookbinder, D. Caprioli, A. W. Case, B. D. G. Chandran, L. J. Chen, T. Horbury, L. Jian, J. C. Kasper, O. Le Contel, B. A. Maruca, W. Matthaeus, A. Retino, O. Roberts, A. Schekochihin, R. Skoug, C. Smith, J. Steinberg, H. Spence, B. Vasquez, J. M. TenBarge, D. Verscharen, P. Whittlesey

Abstract: A multi-institutional, multi-national science team will soon submit a NASA proposal to build a constellation of spacecraft to fly into the near-Earth solar wind in a swarm spanning a multitude of scales in order to obtain critically needed measurements that will reveal the underlying dynamics of magnetized turbulence. This white paper, submitted to the Plasma 2020 Decadal Survey Committee, provide… ▽ More A multi-institutional, multi-national science team will soon submit a NASA proposal to build a constellation of spacecraft to fly into the near-Earth solar wind in a swarm spanning a multitude of scales in order to obtain critically needed measurements that will reveal the underlying dynamics of magnetized turbulence. This white paper, submitted to the Plasma 2020 Decadal Survey Committee, provides a brief overview of turbulent systems that constitute an area of compelling plasma physics research, including why this mission is needed, and how this mission will achieve the goal of revealing how energy is transferred across scales and boundaries in plasmas throughout the universe. △ Less

Submitted 13 August, 2019; v1 submitted 13 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: 6 pages, submitted to the Plasma 2020 Decadal Survey Committee; version 2 includes movie of proposed orbit

[Plasma 2020 Decadal] Disentangling the Spatiotemporal Structure of Turbulence Using Multi-Spacecraft Data

Authors: J. M. TenBarge, O. Alexandrova, S. Boldyrev, F. Califano, S. S. Cerri, C. H. K. Chen, G. G. Howes, T. Horbury, P. A. Isenberg, H. Ji, K. G. Klein, C. Krafft, M. Kunz, N. F. Loureiro, A. Mallet, B. A. Maruca, W. H. Matthaeus, R. Meyrand, E. Quataert, J. C. Perez, O. W. Roberts, F. Sahraoui, C. S. Salem, A. A. Schekochihin, H. Spence , et al. (4 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This white paper submitted for 2020 Decadal Assessment of Plasma Science concerns the importance of multi-spacecraft missions to address fundamental questions concerning plasma turbulence. Plasma turbulence is ubiquitous in the universe, and it is responsible for the transport of mass, momentum, and energy in such diverse systems as the solar corona and wind, accretion discs, planet formation, and… ▽ More This white paper submitted for 2020 Decadal Assessment of Plasma Science concerns the importance of multi-spacecraft missions to address fundamental questions concerning plasma turbulence. Plasma turbulence is ubiquitous in the universe, and it is responsible for the transport of mass, momentum, and energy in such diverse systems as the solar corona and wind, accretion discs, planet formation, and laboratory fusion devices. Turbulence is an inherently multi-scale and multi-process phenomenon, coupling the largest scales of a system to sub-electron scales via a cascade of energy, while simultaneously generating reconnecting current layers, shocks, and a myriad of instabilities and waves. The solar wind is humankind's best resource for studying the naturally occurring turbulent plasmas that permeate the universe. Since launching our first major scientific spacecraft mission, Explorer 1, in 1958, we have made significant progress characterizing solar wind turbulence. Yet, due to the severe limitations imposed by single point measurements, we are unable to characterize sufficiently the spatial and temporal properties of the solar wind, leaving many fundamental questions about plasma turbulence unanswered. Therefore, the time has now come wherein making significant additional progress to determine the dynamical nature of solar wind turbulence requires multi-spacecraft missions spanning a wide range of scales simultaneously. A dedicated multi-spacecraft mission concurrently covering a wide range of scales in the solar wind would not only allow us to directly determine the spatial and temporal structure of plasma turbulence, but it would also mitigate the limitations that current multi-spacecraft missions face, such as non-ideal orbits for observing solar wind turbulence. Some of the fundamentally important questions that can only be addressed by in situ multipoint measurements are discussed. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Comments: 6 pages, submitted for the Plasma 2020 Decadal Survey

Comment on "Atmospheric ionization by high-fluence, hard spectrum solar proton events and their probable appearance in the ice core archive" by A.L. Melott et al

Authors: K. A. Duderstadt, J. E. Dibb, C. H. Jackman, C. E. Randall, N. A. Schwadron, S. C. Solomon, H. E. Spence

Abstract: Melott et al. [2016] suggest that individual solar proton events (SPEs) are detectable as nitrate ion spikes in ice cores. They use the high fluence, high energy (hard spectrum) SPE of 23 February 1956 to calculate an enhancement of HNO3 from the surface to 46 km that is equivalent to a ~120 ng cm-2 nitrate ion spike observed in the GISP2H ice core. The Melott et al. [2016] approach is fundamental… ▽ More Melott et al. [2016] suggest that individual solar proton events (SPEs) are detectable as nitrate ion spikes in ice cores. They use the high fluence, high energy (hard spectrum) SPE of 23 February 1956 to calculate an enhancement of HNO3 from the surface to 46 km that is equivalent to a ~120 ng cm-2 nitrate ion spike observed in the GISP2H ice core. The Melott et al. [2016] approach is fundamentally flawed, since it considers only the absolute column burden of SPE-produced nitrate and not the pre-existing nitrate in the stratosphere. Modeling studies supported by extensive observations [Duderstadt et al., 2014, 2016, and this comment] show background HNO3 in the lower and middle stratosphere equivalent to 2000 to 3000 ng cm-2 nitrate. These high levels of background nitrate must also be included when estimating SPE enhancements to the deposition of nitrate ions that might eventually be preserved in an ice core. The 1956 SPE results in less than a 5% increase in the column burden of atmospheric HNO3, not large enough to explain the nitrate spike seen in the GISP2H ice core. Even extreme SPE enhancements cannot explain nitrate peaks (typically hundreds of percent increases) observed in the ice record [Duderstadt et al., 2016]. Realistic mechanisms linking nitrate ions in ice cores to SPEs have not been established. It is time to move the search for indicators of SPEs away from nitrate ions: Nitrate ions cannot be used as proxies for individual SPEs in the ice core record. △ Less

Submitted 8 July, 2016; v1 submitted 23 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

Comments: 17 pages, 3 figures Corrected to address typographical error

Nitrate ions spikes in ice cores are not suitable proxies for solar proton events

Authors: Katharine A. Duderstadt, Jack E. Dibb, Charles H. Jackman, Cora E. Randall, Nathan A. Schwadron, Stanley C. Solomon, Harlan E. Spence, Valery A. Yudin

Abstract: Nitrate ion spikes in polar ice cores are contentiously used to estimate the intensity, frequency, and probability of historical solar proton events, quantities that are needed to prepare for potentially society-crippling space weather events. We use the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model to calculate how large an event would have to be to produce enough odd nitrogen throughout the atmospher… ▽ More Nitrate ion spikes in polar ice cores are contentiously used to estimate the intensity, frequency, and probability of historical solar proton events, quantities that are needed to prepare for potentially society-crippling space weather events. We use the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model to calculate how large an event would have to be to produce enough odd nitrogen throughout the atmosphere to be discernible as nitrate peaks at the Earth's surface. These hypothetically large events are compared with probability of occurrence estimates derived from measured events, sunspot records, and cosmogenic radionuclides archives. We conclude that the fluence and spectrum of solar proton events necessary to produce odd nitrogen enhancements equivalent to the spikes of nitrate ions in Greenland ice cores are unlikely to have occurred throughout the Holocene, confirming that nitrate ions in ice cores are not suitable proxies for historical individual solar proton events. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: 60 pages, 17 figures, to be published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Examining Periodic Solar Wind Density Structures Observed in the SECCHI Heliospheric Imagers

Authors: Nicholeen M. Viall, Harlan E. Spence, Angelos Vourlidas, Russell Howard

Abstract: We present an analysis of small-scale, periodic, solar-wind density enhancements (length-scales as small as \approx 1000 Mm) observed in images from the Heliospheric Imager (HI) aboard STEREO A. We discuss their possible relationship to periodic fluctuations of the proton density that have been identified at 1 AU using in-situ plasma measurements. Specifically, Viall, Kepko, and Spence (2008) exam… ▽ More We present an analysis of small-scale, periodic, solar-wind density enhancements (length-scales as small as \approx 1000 Mm) observed in images from the Heliospheric Imager (HI) aboard STEREO A. We discuss their possible relationship to periodic fluctuations of the proton density that have been identified at 1 AU using in-situ plasma measurements. Specifically, Viall, Kepko, and Spence (2008) examined 11 years of in-situ solar-wind density measurements at 1 AU and demonstrated that not only turbulent structures, but also non-turbulent periodic density structures exist in the solar wind with scale sizes of hundreds to one thousand Mm. In a subsequent paper, Viall, Spence, and Kasper (2009) analyzed the α to proton solar-wind abundance ratio measured during one such event of periodic density structures, demonstrating that the plasma behavior was highly suggestive that either temporally or spatially varying coronal source plasma created those density structures. Large periodic density structures observed at 1 AU, which were generated in the corona, can be observable in coronal and heliospheric white-light images if they possess sufficiently high density contrast. Indeed, we identify such periodic density structures as they enter the HI field of view and follow them as they advect with the solar wind through the images. The smaller periodic density structures that we identify in the images are comparable in size to the larger structures analyzed in-situ at 1 AU, yielding further evidence that periodic density enhancements are a consequence of coronal activity as the solar wind is formed. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2010; originally announced September 2010.

Comments: 15 pages, 12 figures. The final publication is available at http://www.springerlink.com